[REBOL] Re: cerebrus revisited
From: robert:muench:robertmuench at: 5-Feb-2003 8:17
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [rebol-bounce--rebol--com] [mailto:[rebol-bounce--rebol--com]]
> On Behalf Of Graham Chiu
> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 1:25 AM
> To: [rebol-list--rebol--com]
> Subject: [REBOL] Re: cerebrus revisited
> It seems to be for encapped View applications. AltME is
> running about 15Mb. I was concerned about this memory
> footprint, but I guess with memory being as cheap as it is
> these days, the problem will become less significant.
Hi, sorry I can't agree here. Memeory-Footprint is an issue and should
always be worked on. That's the spirit of Rebol anyway, isn't it? My
Link clients have a footprint of about 25 MB each and I need to run 3
instances of it... Boggles down my Laptop over time.
IMO memory-footprint should always be as minimal as possible and RT
should continue to work on further reduction of it. Robert