Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

[REBOL] Re: cerebrus revisited

From: gchiu:compkarori at: 5-Feb-2003 13:24

On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 22:15:33 +0100 Hallvard Ystad <[hallvard--ystad--helpinhand--com]> wrote:
>1) I received an email containing two jpgs and an avi >film. Since the download took ages, I pushed cancel in my >client software (Eudora 5.2). Cerebrus continued (of >course), but didn't _ever_ stop. It took a great deal of >my computer cpu after a while...
If you cancelled Cerebrus, that would have killed the download, but of course the next time round, it would try again to download the large file.
>2) Memory usage. Look at http://helpinhand.com/c.jpg, >which is a screendump from my computer. It seems cerebrus >has a higher mem usage than opera with three different >locations open. And a higher mem usage than Eudora. Is >this normal?
It seems to be for encapped View applications. AltME is running about 15Mb. I was concerned about this memory footprint, but I guess with memory being as cheap as it is these days, the problem will become less significant.
>Here's the thought: >When I receive an email that cerebrus classifies as spam, >and I whish to allow it based on the from: field, how >about just letting me forward that email to myself with a >special subject heading? (Instead of composing a new >email). Are original headers still with us in forwarded >emails? In Eudora, they are put in the message body. Will >that do? What do other email clients do?
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Cerebrus decouples image links to email classed as spam, and you can fix that by forwarding it back to yourself as an attachment, putting your Cerebrus password in the subject, and the command "repair" in the body. That would work also for plain text email as well. -- Graham Chiu http://www.compkarori.com/cerebrus