World: r3wp
[Tech News] Interesting technology
older newer | first last |
Graham 30-Apr-2010 [4879x3] | their own ... |
And WebOS being linux based will run on their x86 slate ... . HP will then end up with the whole stack | |
And since Rebol can't get on to the iPad, we should have access to HP's slate instead .. so this looks good for us. | |
BrianH 30-Apr-2010 [4882] | Plus, HP's leadership when they purchased Compaq is completely different from who runs the company now. |
Henrik 6-May-2010 [4883] | http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/05/05/microsoft_ie9_and_canvasn/ IE9 won't support HTML5 canvas. |
Pekr 6-May-2010 [4884] | Interesting and surprising - they wanted to position themselves to the top again ... |
AdrianS 6-May-2010 [4885] | I believe on of the commenters is right in that MS wants to push for Silverlight adoption. |
BrianH 6-May-2010 [4886] | Interesting - I interpreted it as "MS employees are prohibited from promising anything they might not deliver, especially after the Longhorn debacle". They don't say they aren't doing Canvas, just that they can't commit to doing Canvas. Clearly the IE team wants to, but since they haven't started writing the code yet they are being smart and not making promises. The IE team hasn't been preannouncing features until they can *demonstrate* features. |
Reichart 8-May-2010 [4887] | http://video.golem.de/politik-recht/3070/patent-absurdity-dokumentarfilm.html |
AdrianS 9-May-2010 [4888] | thanks Reichart - I was feeling a little too relaxed - that got the blood boiling |
Gabriele 9-May-2010 [4889] | the concept of software patents in the US is, in practice, basically the same as nuclear weapons. you have to have them as a "defense" against other companies. it's something you keep there, so that other companies will think twice before attacking you. |
Robert 9-May-2010 [4890] | I'm more for the guerillia tactics: Don't care about it, just release the apps in a way that it's not trackable who did them and build an indirect consulting business around it. |
Gabriele 9-May-2010 [4891] | ah, but then it's simpler than that. just let the US lose all tech advantage in the software world. when they realize the problem they'll get rid of software patents. when products can be sold almost everywhere in the world except in the US... people will start to understand the issue. |
Ladislav 9-May-2010 [4892x3] | yes, that tactics can work, except it is a problem if the EC succeeds to push the software patents down our throats too. Moreover, there already are some patents of this kind accepted by EPO - see e.g. http://eupat.ffii.org/10/03/bessen/, even though it is "against the letter and spirit of the written law" |
also: http://www.nosoftwarepatents-award.com/ | |
also http://eupat.ffii.org/ | |
Henrik 10-May-2010 [4895] | http://blog.laptopmag.com/wpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Mobile-Patent-Lawsuits.png |
Pekr 10-May-2010 [4896] | :-) |
Henrik 10-May-2010 [4897] | *somebody* is making money there... |
Pekr 11-May-2010 [4898] | http://www.osnews.com/story/23275/Adobe_Shows_Off_Flash_10_1_on_Android_Impresses |
Maxim 13-May-2010 [4899] | ouch limewire all set to go bust! http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/05/major-copyright-defeat-tastes-sour-for-limewire.ars |
Pekr 15-May-2010 [4900x2] | Google releases preview of their "Native client" SDK - http://blog.chromium.org/2010/05/sneak-peek-at-native-client-sdk.html |
Those ppl are just admitting, that the REBOL way was correct from the very beginning - to have "rich client", which can do stuff for you things directly on user's machine - no server, no html ... how funny .... | |
amacleod 15-May-2010 [4902] | Right. Just need some seemless means of R3 interacting in the browser...back to plug-in? |
Pekr 15-May-2010 [4903] | I think that plugin is going to be needed. NPAPI, npruntime. The other way around would be an Extension, webkit rendering into REBOL face (gob) :-) |
amacleod 15-May-2010 [4904] | i guess that would be another job for the communtiy to get the plug-in on all browsers and platforms |
BrianH 15-May-2010 [4905x4] | Pekr, you do realize that Google's Native Client is a browser extension, right? And it's for use within HTML, which will usually be served up from a server? And that it won't run outside of a browser? Google has been advocating the rich client for years, but the rich client that it has been advocating is the web browser. This is just them acknowledging that Javascript sucks for some purposes - they still want you to use the rest of the web stuff. |
For a more direct avocation of the REBOL approach, look at Silverlight or Adobe AIR. | |
avocation -> advocation | |
Alan, we need to work more on REBOL's security model first: R3 has made a good start in that direction, but there is more to go. | |
Pekr 15-May-2010 [4909x3] | I think that npapi plugin is the fastest way to get into the browser. But even then - Google and Apple are creating propaganda, that actually "installing" anything into the browser (plugin) is a bad thing :-) |
Yes, security :-) | |
ok, going to watch a hockey championship .... | |
Pekr 17-May-2010 [4912] | Google adds JIT to Android 2.2 - http://www.osnews.com/comments/23310 |
Henrik 19-May-2010 [4913] | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0Ta-wAdvh8 Good way of misunderstanding the needs for motion sensing in phones. |
AdrianS 19-May-2010 [4914] | I don't see how improved motion tracking is a bad thing, Henrik - yeah, some of the uses mentioned are marginal, but I can see that overall, the increased tracking accuracy would be really useful |
Maxim 19-May-2010 [4915] | you can tap anywhere... even on the platic... I found that cool. |
AdrianS 19-May-2010 [4916x3] | imagine playing "air drums" with this |
well, maybe with two phones | |
I would think that you could train it to recognize your gait, so that if someone else walks away with your phone it could call home, shut down, wipe sensitive data, etc | |
Maxim 19-May-2010 [4919] | yeah... cool, until you break your leg and can't call 911 ;-) |
Pekr 19-May-2010 [4920] | Well, I think that what Henrik means is, that he doubts practical usability in regards to your cell phone :-) Shaking my HTC TouchPro 2 with costed me lots of money and weigths 200g, might turn into risky business :-))) |
AdrianS 19-May-2010 [4921] | any extreme action triggered by motion could be confirmed by having to input a password within a certain amount of time |
Maxim 19-May-2010 [4922] | I really like some of the gestures, like holding your phone upside down and it closes the curent ap, tilting it to slide the view, etc. |
AdrianS 19-May-2010 [4923] | one of the points of this processor is that you don't have to be very jerky in performing the motion |
Maxim 19-May-2010 [4924] | yep since itas a gyroscope, the orientation is perfect and accessible in real time, much better than an accelerometer. |
AdrianS 19-May-2010 [4925x2] | my "ultimate" wish is to have the touch sensitive areas on the device extended to the body - everything should be touch and pressure sensitive |
then you could use a combination of motion, pressure, touch points, camera input, mic input to invoke all kinds of complex actions with combination "hotkeys" | |
Pekr 19-May-2010 [4927] | I miss one VERY practical usability. Imagine you have met some accident situation, and you call emergency. Now most smart phones have A-GPS chip. I would like to just press one button, to send my GPS location - so no starting of GPS related app, writing it down, and telling it to 911 .... |
AdrianS 19-May-2010 [4928] | we're pretty good at motion and position memory |
older newer | first last |