World: r3wp
[Tech News] Interesting technology
older newer | first last |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1792x3] | the rest of java is lots of libs. nice to have but big.. |
Which is written very oopsy. rewrite that for size and its 1 mb more. | |
how big is a flash-download? | |
PeterWood 6-Feb-2007 [1795] | Just under 2 mb from what I can tell |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1796] | Would allow 3mb uncompressed. |
Maxim 6-Feb-2007 [1797] | I tried deploying a commercial tool in the brower and its very effective. hehe it allows people to circumvent their sysadmins :-) |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1798] | But needs lots of knowledge about the internals. Maybe if based on ME . butall speculations.. :) |
Maxim 6-Feb-2007 [1799] | I only wish there where a safe way to implement local file sandbox within plugin. AFAIK, the write and save commands do nothing... |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1800x2] | AFAIK they work like desktop-sandbox. in another folder. |
run a script and show what-dir | |
Maxim 6-Feb-2007 [1802] | moving to plugin group. |
Henrik 6-Feb-2007 [1803] | http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/<-- Steve Jobs encourages the removal of DRM from music. |
Graham 6-Feb-2007 [1804] | Anyone tried this http://www.siteadvisor.com/.. plugin for firefox and ie that tells you about a site's safety rating in terms of spyware, popups etc |
Alan 7-Feb-2007 [1805] | firefox warned me not to install,it's a McAffee product |
Graham 7-Feb-2007 [1806] | It was created by some guys who were then bought out by Macfee ... |
MikeL 7-Feb-2007 [1807] | Site advisor works for me. |
Oldes 8-Feb-2007 [1808] | http://www.break.com/index/awesome_folding_chair.html |
BrianH 8-Feb-2007 [1809] | I want one, or a whole set! |
Graham 8-Feb-2007 [1810] | Looks like an overgrown Xmas decoration |
BrianH 8-Feb-2007 [1811] | I thought a Slinky. |
Graham 8-Feb-2007 [1812x3] | those Xmas decorations that are flat, and you unfold them to form a cylindrical decoration |
this is also known as "prior art" | |
ok, that was a bad pun | |
BrianH 8-Feb-2007 [1815] | :) |
Graham 8-Feb-2007 [1816] | Have a look at http://mail.rebol.com/ |
Sunanda 8-Feb-2007 [1817] | What should it be? The ML is at http://mail.rebol.net |
Graham 8-Feb-2007 [1818] | Ahh... |
Sunanda 8-Feb-2007 [1819] | Which was not to say it shouldn't be something other than it is, just that it isn't not what you thought it ought to be. |
Maxim 8-Feb-2007 [1820] | how to properly load windows vista: http://www.break.com/index/how_to_properly_load_vista.html?playall=1 |
Pekr 9-Feb-2007 [1821x2] | Apple's iPhone has got a competition. It it in no way revolutionary. Eugenia from OSNews has some nice blog about it. First there was LG, now there is Samsung - those companies surely had such products in development for quite some time. Here's first look at Samsungs machine. And it got keyboard! http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/en/news-13261-When+the+Korean+GOD+awake%2C+he+gives+us...+the+Samsung+Ultra+Smart+F700.html |
Hopefully the long link works .... | |
Maxim 9-Feb-2007 [1823x2] | apple did say somewhere they werent the manufacturers. |
that is a really nice toy btw. | |
Pekr 9-Feb-2007 [1825] | LG Prada is another one, maybe even OpenMoko |
Henrik 9-Feb-2007 [1826] | so, can you make calls on it? |
Pekr 9-Feb-2007 [1827] | make calls on what? |
Henrik 9-Feb-2007 [1828] | the samsung phone |
Pekr 9-Feb-2007 [1829] | Samsung dunno, LG Prada should be out soon - it is being tested by various servers already |
Henrik 9-Feb-2007 [1830] | it's ok. Calling on a phone is apparently unimportant anyway. :-) |
Pekr 9-Feb-2007 [1831] | I don't understand - it is not a pda, it is a smartphone, so why should not be it possible to make calls on it? |
Graham 9-Feb-2007 [1832] | it was a joke |
Pekr 9-Feb-2007 [1833] | ah, joke not in a humour channel :-) |
Maxim 9-Feb-2007 [1834] | not news, but this is like science fiction made true !!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z_machine |
Tomc 9-Feb-2007 [1835] | http://wikileaks.org/index |
Ingo 13-Feb-2007 [1836] | ... first phones finally freed ... OpenMoko update: http://lwn.net/Articles/221821/ ... http://www.openmoko.com... ;-) |
Pekr 16-Feb-2007 [1837] | Taken from OSNews - so much for a "great" Apple: Parallels recently made a definitive statement saying that the company won't be making it easy for users to run OS X in a virtual environment anytime soon. The reasoning behind this was because they don't want to put their users at risk of breaking the OS X EULA - unlike Windows Vista, there is no version of OS X that can be run under a virtual machine - and more importantly, they don't want to strain their (currently good) relationship with Apple. As a followup to that statement from Parallels, I was able to also get in touch with Srinivas Krishnamurti, VMWare's Director of Product Management and Market Development in order to get VMWare's official position on the matter. Apple does not currently allow running Mac OS X in a virtual machine," he said. "Apple is an important partner and VMware respects Apple's intellectual property." |
BrianH 16-Feb-2007 [1838x3] | The license restriction in question is one stating that Mac OS can only be run on Apple hardware. This restriction has been in their licenses for a long time. It should be noted that restrictions like this are often illegal for them to enforce in most countries that have consumer protection laws, such as all "Western" countries. |
Still, they can throw lawyers at you, and even if you are in the right, legal fees will likely bankrupt you. Legalized extortion. | |
In contrast, Windows licensing allows you to run in virtual machines as long as you own a license for the OS in the VM. This is even the case for Vista Home, despite "reports" to the contrary. With Vista Ultimate, you can reuse the license of the host in VMs running in the same computer. | |
Henrik 16-Feb-2007 [1841] | This is from the time where the Apple clones were killed, as Apple lost a lot of money to them, since they couldn't compete with them. Removing the clones and prohibiting use of MacOS on other than Apple hardware "solved" that problem. |
older newer | first last |