World: r3wp
[Tech News] Interesting technology
older newer | first last |
Pekr 6-Feb-2007 [1742] | Few weeks ago I looked into some View demos, and I still think, that if we do it right, and even prepare those demos for plug-in, it still can influence some ppl .... |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1743x2] | Yep. And a popular ide which silently used them. Good work, both vm and ide. But it worked not on the others. And some things where chngedfrom thestandard, so stuff fro other ideasdid not work well. of course every bug was javas fault, not that of MS. |
Waht we need is IOS without competing with IOS.. | |
Pekr 6-Feb-2007 [1745x3] | IOS is no more supported |
I asked Cindy, if I can sell my copy I did not manage to sell here. So, if anyone wants IOS cheapo, just contact me :-) | |
I think that Carl has the same idea - Altissimo - rebservices, plug-in or stand-alone client, small reblets ... could work ... | |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1748] | If it gets ever implemented yes. |
PeterWood 6-Feb-2007 [1749] | Petr: IOS is no more supported is that official |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1750] | Ifit works seamless with apopular browser, like flash etc, even more. |
Pekr 6-Feb-2007 [1751] | eh, probably not official .... |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1752] | the problem with IOS is, it was the right library, and without it rebol cant play out its real strength. |
PeterWood 6-Feb-2007 [1753] | ...it's just that we use IOS to support Rebol.org |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1754] | And it cant be cloned becausethat would hurt RT. Well, could be cloned, we are justto nice^^ |
Pekr 6-Feb-2007 [1755x2] | IOS is nice ... imo we need R3 infastructure fast. We then need some C coders to take-over the open-sourced parts. As for a plug-in, browser support was good enough imo, but it did not support certificates, good installation/upgrade process etc. |
Volker - if IOS is not supported, noone will care for cloning ... | |
PeterWood 6-Feb-2007 [1757] | For me the biggest problem with the plug-in is no access to the DOM |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1758] | there is a way to call javascript, oristhatbroken? from thereto DOM the browser. :) |
PeterWood 6-Feb-2007 [1759] | But most people would say if I have to call JavaScript to access the DOM why bother with Rebol. |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1760] | if i have to write html to display something, why botherwith javascript?^^ |
Pekr 6-Feb-2007 [1761] | Because whole your app is in rebol? I am not designing my app to navigate html, I want full View app, so what's with DOM :-) |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1762x3] | that javascript can be build by a little library. |
Peter wanted it^^ | |
And for now browsers have better layouting for text | |
Pekr 6-Feb-2007 [1765] | so if you are not thinking of a full View app, then what do you plan to use Rebol for? As an js replacement? |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1766x2] | for the logicparts i do now on the server. |
what i would do now with a local webserver. | |
PeterWood 6-Feb-2007 [1768] | Yes I think I would prefer to be able to use Rebol instead of JavaScript for anything processor intensive. |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1769x3] | /view could still do animations, menues and such. |
say a reblet left or top, tabs, or text html, for painting /view. | |
below | |
PeterWood 6-Feb-2007 [1772] | From my observation Rebol calculations are much faster than JavaScript especially for integers |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1773] | And: AFAIK DOM means other plugins to. IConrtol the viedo :) |
PeterWood 6-Feb-2007 [1774] | I'm sure that parse is faster than Javascript's Regex engine too |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1775x2] | Isimply have more rebol-skills than javascript skills^^ |
for speedi would still try javascript+java, but for comfort.. | |
Pekr 6-Feb-2007 [1777] | ok, now I understand ... I know that current DOM-via-js is not very much powerfull, but we have at least something. Or we need proper XML parser then? |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1778] | I have no big clue. AFAIK javascript can call everything, and rebol can call javascript. And javascript can be generated. |
PeterWood 6-Feb-2007 [1779] | The main issue with javascript+java is if java isn't installed on the cleint's browser - you then ahve a big download - as Petr has pointed-out a rebol plug-in would be smaller than some JavaScript downloads..... |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1780x4] | Drawback is, AFAIK javascript can not call rebol. which would be nice for buttons and such. |
Yes, butthe jitwould be better, and ifiaim for speed.. | |
And with googles compileri may beable tohave a pure javascriptversion from the same source. | |
Hmm, shouldchange the keyboard.. | |
PeterWood 6-Feb-2007 [1784] | ..so you really want a Rebcode plug-in ;-) |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1785x2] | Naa, native is still faster. |
A raw hotspot withoutall the libs, and rebolon top :) | |
Pekr 6-Feb-2007 [1787x2] | uh, it looks like you talk in some cipher :-) |
rebcode plug-in? Well, I hope, as new rebol will be mostly a .dll component, that we will be able to link it, call into it, etc.? | |
PeterWood 6-Feb-2007 [1789] | It's just that Volker's space bar isn't working :-) |
Volker 6-Feb-2007 [1790x2] | hotspot is the jit which makes java that fast today. 1 mb i guess. |
oh yes, and its the spacebar.. That or back to a keyboard with cable. | |
older newer | first last |