World: r3wp
[!AltME] Discussion about AltME
older newer | first last |
PeterWood 31-Jan-2007 [2138x3] | One is old and empty -- the second I've just created :-) Let me tidy them up. |
There are now two AtlME checklists: AltME Top Ten Peeves AltME Top Ten Wishes | |
I'm sure that I've missed some of the peeves/wishes mentioned earlier but I didn't go back through all the posts. | |
Henrik 1-Feb-2007 [2141x2] | what about parsing out email addresses to smoething (at) somewhere (dot) com ? |
for web publishing | |
PeterWood 1-Feb-2007 [2143x2] | Isn't that more of a problem with Carl's script that publishes AltME on the web? |
Perhaps a feedback to him at RT would the trick. | |
Henrik 1-Feb-2007 [2145x2] | it probably is. I don't know how it works... |
but it's also possible to publish through AltME manually. | |
PeterWood 1-Feb-2007 [2147] | Fair point - why don't you add it to the Peeves or Wishlist |
Henrik 1-Feb-2007 [2148] | speaking of that, formatting in HTML is quite bad. Timestamp takes up 20% of the page width, twice as much as needed. |
Graham 1-Feb-2007 [2149x2] | seems that something like that happens |
my email address was obfuscated a little | |
sqlab 1-Feb-2007 [2151x2] | I seems I got a new AltMe 1.2.11. I crashed when I tried to see the offered url with the new features. It is more slow. |
There are two I that should be It above | |
Graham 1-Feb-2007 [2153] | I just updated to 1.2.12 |
PeterWood 1-Feb-2007 [2154] | Me too ..two updates in a day !! |
Graham 1-Feb-2007 [2155] | I wonder if our list of peeves is being considered? :) |
[unknown: 9] 1-Feb-2007 [2156] | No one here but us mice... |
Sunanda 1-Feb-2007 [2157] | Of course, I didn't let the new versions install themselves. I'm with Reichart here -- change nothing until the vote is unanimous :-) |
Tomc 1-Feb-2007 [2158] | is anyone else having trouble (re) starting a world on linux? I have ports 5500 & 5400 open but it starting fails iptables says ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere state NEW tcp dpt:5500 ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywhere state NEW tcp dpt:5400 |
Graham 2-Feb-2007 [2159] | Seems some people can't count. The top 10 wishes are populated with over 10 ! |
Ammon 2-Feb-2007 [2160] | There. Fixed. |
Graham 2-Feb-2007 [2161x2] | Remember .. Reichart says he will fix the top 10 agreed peeves .. if everyone can concur. |
Regarding crash on recycle .. I don't think that bug exists in recent builds. Has anyone seen it in a recent build?? | |
Ammon 2-Feb-2007 [2163x2] | Last I recall, you can still get it if you have the messages turned up above 5k or so. |
I keep mine down below 1k most of the time so I don't have a problem | |
[unknown: 9] 2-Feb-2007 [2165] | Seems some people can't count. The top 10 wishes are populated with over 10 ! What? |
Tomc 2-Feb-2007 [2166] | top ten should be labled 0-9 |
Sunanda 2-Feb-2007 [2167] | I can see two reasons why a top 10 could have more than10 entries in it..... .....First, it is about ranking -- if 100 people graduate from a class, and 30 of them all have identical top scores, then the top 1 position is held by 30 people. Depending then on how you define "top 10": the top 10 is either: * the top 30 graduates; or * some larger number (the total graduates with the highest distinct ten scores -- which could be all of them). Second,. it could be an unconscious homage to the 10 reasons why Base Camp Sucks (It seems the Base Camp developers also chose to disregard user priorities, but they at least deny requests as they are made rather than play mind games with the user community): http://www.whybasecampsux.org/ |
Graham 2-Feb-2007 [2168] | I was actually kidding about the top 10 |
[unknown: 9] 2-Feb-2007 [2169x2] | All jokes aside, Jason and I have exactly opposite philosophies... |
It seems the Base Camp developers also chose to disregard user priorities that is pretty rude....unfair, and untrue...shame.... | |
Sunanda 2-Feb-2007 [2171] | Reichart: <<The great thing about a democracy is that it disfavours minorities. So you can't get anything done until ALL of you agree.>> Similarly, I'll agree with your analysis when we all agree with it. Sound fair? |
PeterWood 2-Feb-2007 [2172x8] | Seems some people can't count. The top 10 wishes are populated with over 10 ! Is it a peeve or a wish that the number of entries isn't shown iin an AltME checklist? |
By virtue of being foolish enough to start the checklists, I've taken responsibility for tidying them up in the hope that we can present Reichart with a useful list he will honour-bound to seriously consider. | |
I'm happy for somebody else to do it. | |
I've downgraded the priority of Display of html links is a mess because no example of what a better display would look like is given. | |
I removed file sharing from the wishlist because AltME supports file sharing. As I understand it is the owner of the Rebol3 world who, so far, doesn't want to enable it. | |
I merged two peeves into Message highlighting lost on disconnection...I added the other into the details. | |
I found that most of the items on the wishlist to be very cryptic. If we really want something isn't it worth writing a short explanation? | |
I downgraded the Mac OS X Version becuase there is already a beta version available. | |
Oldes 2-Feb-2007 [2180x3] | sorry, but html links are messed - for example this one: http://duggmirror.com/gaming/AMAZING_Comparison_Between_Real-Life_and_the_CRYSIS_Engine/ed523ffc741a61874ba4e6cd3fad7bd4_comparison018mx4df.jpg <--- 3D gaming as of 2007 will look something like that. |
I don't know what do you mean with "no example" | |
(the link is from links channel - it's just an example) | |
Sunanda 2-Feb-2007 [2183] | Seeing messed up links depends partially on your window width -- so some people see them at times while others don't. |
Oldes 2-Feb-2007 [2184] | Don't know how the link above see others, but I know, that I don't see complete text which follows: <--- 3D gaming as of 2007 will look something like that. Which consider as an important bug |
Henrik 2-Feb-2007 [2185] | I actually forgot a pet peeve of mine: I hate the fact that red groups look very much like black groups on a bad monitor. I would rather have a graphic to show whichi group is read or not. |
Oldes 2-Feb-2007 [2186] | maybe possibility to do skinning (at least color settings) would solve this issue. But you must have really bad monitor if you have such a problem:-) |
Henrik 2-Feb-2007 [2187] | Oldes, maybe it can be because I'm also a bit red/green color blind. I really have to squint to see which group is red among a long list of black groups. |
older newer | first last |