World: r3wp
[!AltME] Discussion about AltME
older newer | first last |
Terry 19-Feb-2005 [299] | FYI - My server crashed (win2k) just as I was starting Altme, somehow all world data was destroyed, and Altme refused to run. Required a re-install. |
Graham 19-Feb-2005 [300] | you lost all your world data? do you mean your data is all blank? Or was it corrupted? |
Terry 19-Feb-2005 [301] | It was gone completely. |
Graham 19-Feb-2005 [302] | perhaps you're looking in the wrong directory? |
[unknown: 9] 20-Feb-2005 [303] | It was gone completely. What method did you use to search for it? |
Terry 20-Feb-2005 [304] | File exploder..didn't spend too much time diagnosing.. perhaps it was there somewhere.. but it sure wasn't working.. I recommend that you don't use Altme to control any nuclear reactors without some extensive testing. |
Allen 20-Feb-2005 [305] | Current Altme uses a different directory to the early betas. Likely the worlds are still there, just in the old location |
DideC 20-Feb-2005 [306] | If files are "gone", they should be found by chkdsk and be in the FOUND.XXX directory. But names are lost :-( |
Graham 20-Feb-2005 [307] | chkdsk?? wow, what version of dos are u using? |
Vincent 20-Feb-2005 [308] | Terry: I hope nobody uses Win2k to control any nuclear reactor. Win2k does crash and removes files being modified. chkdsk works well, but you have to analyse all restored files to figure filenames, and files are extended to block boundaries. (had to recover an usb zip disk, a nightmare) I don't think AltME is fautly here - I never saw any Rebol apps trashing filesystem. |
Terry 21-Feb-2005 [309] | Should probably use RTOS for reactor. |
DideC 21-Feb-2005 [310x2] | not DOS, win2k or XP (ex: scandisk under 9x) |
not "ex:" but "ex" | |
Graham 21-Feb-2005 [312] | ahhh... does it have advantages over scandisk? |
DideC 21-Feb-2005 [313x2] | I find it worst, not as "graphical" (hum, even if it's only semigraphical). But it handle Fat and NTFS |
Why do you saty with this "G" as your name. I ddon't like that so much ! | |
Graham 21-Feb-2005 [315x2] | Well, it makes it clearer when someone is quoting me :) |
Your own nick is an abbreviation as well is it not? | |
DideC 21-Feb-2005 [317] | OK Greg |
Graham 21-Feb-2005 [318] | yep |
JaimeVargas 21-Feb-2005 [319] | All this conversations are going to become a big confusion. How many A B C are reused here. |
Graham 21-Feb-2005 [320] | It's an experiment ... if R feels it is not going to work, he'll change the names back again. |
JaimeVargas 21-Feb-2005 [321] | We know of two G a couple of R(s), Some C(s) [Carl Cyphre]. But Cyphre real name is Richard so he can be confuse with R for Reichart. |
DideC 21-Feb-2005 [322] | It's what I mean. If everybody rename himself with a OLA This world will gone to hell !!! |
JaimeVargas 21-Feb-2005 [323] | And I am sure C/R doesn't have a double personality. |
Graham 21-Feb-2005 [324x3] | but you can't rename yourself .. only world masters can do this |
Actually on most BBSs, people tend to use pseudonyms and not their real name | |
I think I should have asked R to change mine to X | |
JaimeVargas 21-Feb-2005 [327x3] | But I had seen others addressing Cyphre as Richard. |
A few times. | |
I don't think having OLA(s) is very useful for posting. It is great in when a conversation is going on. Like a year ago when we were all working towards a new view, and Carl use the OLA to reply. But for general postings it doesn't make any sense. IMHO. | |
Graham 21-Feb-2005 [330] | while I've got your attention .. how does one interpret this .. ip/24 or ip/32 ? |
JaimeVargas 21-Feb-2005 [331x2] | ip/prefix prefix stands for the number of bits that are set to one in the network. It is a way to partition the address space. |
ie. 10.10.10.0/24 is referreing to any valid ip-address in the range 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.255 | |
Graham 21-Feb-2005 [333] | what does /32 do then? |
JaimeVargas 21-Feb-2005 [334] | 10.10.10.5/32 referes only to the ip-address 10.10.10.5 it is a host ip-address not a range for a network |
Graham 21-Feb-2005 [335x2] | ok. |
I was just reading in the squid docs that I need to specify for a single ip address .. ip/32 | |
JaimeVargas 21-Feb-2005 [337x2] | ;ip address are 32 bits. So when you do a mask comparison 10.10.10.5 and 255.255.255.255 == 10.10.10.5 |
;while 10.10.10.5 and 255.255.255.0 == 10.10.10.0 | |
Graham 21-Feb-2005 [339] | ok, I guess I need to read up a bit about this to understand it better. |
JaimeVargas 21-Feb-2005 [340] | ; in general 10.10.10.x and 255.255.255.0 == 10.10.10.0 ; where 0 <= x <= 255 |
DideC 21-Feb-2005 [341] | Are you the G dot ? ;-) |
JaimeVargas 21-Feb-2005 [342x3] | That is the reason that 10.10.10.5 and 10.10.10.15 are on the same subnet. |
255.255.255.0 corresponds to a 24 prefix in CIDR notation. | |
255.255.255.0 is what used to be know a Class C mask | |
eFishAnt 27-Feb-2005 [345] | mr R: after WNS was restored, I had to reboot my world to allow people to log back in. Sent feedback. |
[unknown: 9] 28-Feb-2005 [346] | Ah, interesting. thanks. |
Colin 28-Feb-2005 [347] | I had to reboot my world too as it wouldnt accept my logon/password until I did. Never happened before. |
Graham 28-Feb-2005 [348] | usually happens to me .. that I have to reboot after a failure of the name server |
older newer | first last |