[REBOL] Re: Licensing, components ... Re: REBOL FAQ updated
From: jason:cunliffe:verizon at: 13-Sep-2002 21:56
> I have nothing agaist Perl, Python, or any other language (If I hadn't found
> REBOL, I might be using Ruby right now), but I come from a different world,
> a world where I paid for the software I used, so that's OK with me. On one
> hand, some languages are free, OTOH Visual Studio .Net costs from $1,000 to
> $2,500 (an upgrade is $550).
Gregg
hmm.. I don't think we come from very different worlds.
I use lots of free software: Python being an excellent example.
I also buy lots of software, from $20 shareware on up, and including
REBOL/Command for Windows [but now wish I had bought the Linux one instead or
that there were a friendlier cross platform package pricing for existing
customers.. incrementally if you own one buy the next ones at 50% off or
something. Buy all versions together for ... $really attractive package price].
When there is even a very modest budget, I make sure software licenses are part
of that. I buy lots of upgrades. I also downloads lots of demos to get a feeling
for new tools, new versions, compatibility etc. When I can't find demos, and
between jobs I educate myself by browsing around with tools like Limewire.
Sometimes just to learn what's hot, in the sense of
popular/interesting/happening.. I learned about VegasVideo2 that way. Took it
for a test-drive. Was really impressed... I am now proud and happy owner of
Vegas Video3.
I never shy away from buying 3rd party tools, even ones which support free
software. I buy a ton of books too every month, which I consider software also,
and they don't have to have CDROMS in them. When I am unemployed like now with a
pile of bills I have to suspend all the above luxuries of learning.
On a limited, private, individual basis, it's OK with me too that REBOL charge.
But I do question its impact or strategic effect on public perception and
acceptance of the technology. And in that respect it affect my own choice of it
also. I have various ideas for REBOL-based projects, some of which would require
embedding it in other SDKs. The current policies are deterrent at this stage of
the game. Not developer-friendly, neither speculative start-up friendly.
I don't think it is fair, or relevant, to compare REBOL with Microsoft products.
Massive market penetration, promotion, documentation, with huge installed
developer and use populations...not to mention monopolistic tendencies.
Not try to flame you please understand.. just hoping for some insights and
changes into this very difficult problem at a difficult time in the
techno-economy.
What to do?
I wish there was REBOL conference we could all go to..
./Jason
