Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

[REBOL] Re: Reading empty directories via FTP error

From: atruter:labyrinth:au at: 12-Nov-2003 12:09

> Hi Ashley, > > For your errors, the 226 error looks like something my patch file fixes. > But > as you have not mentioned trying it, I'll repeat the URL again: > http://www.codeconscious.com/rebsite/rebol-library/patches.r
No luck ;(
>> write site/test/a2 "a"
URL Parse: userid password www.site.com.au none public_html/test/ a2 Net-log: ["Opening" "tcp" "for" "FTP"] connecting to: www.site.com.au Net-log: [ none ["220" "230"]] Net-log: {220---------- Welcome to Pure-FTPd 1.0.14 ----------} Net-log: "220-You are user number 1 of 50 allowed." Net-log: {220-Local time is now 11:53 and the load is 1.11. Server port: 21.} Net-log: "220-This is a private system - No anonymous login" Net-log: {220 You will be disconnected after 30 minutes of inactivity.} Net-log: [ ["USER" port/user] "331"] Net-log: "331 User userid OK. Password required" Net-log: [ ["PASS" port/pass] "230"] Net-log: "230-Your bandwidth usage is restricted" Net-log: "230-User userid has group access to: 2000 " Net-log: "230 OK. Current directory is /" Net-log: [ "SYST" "*"] Net-log: "215 UNIX Type: L8" Net-log: [ ["PORT" port/locals/active-check] "200"] Net-log: "200 PORT command successful" Net-log: [ ["CWD" either empty? port/path ["./"] [either slash = port/path/1 [port/path ] [join "./" port/path]]] "25*"] Net-log: "250 OK. Current directory is /public_html/test" Net-log: [ ["TYPE I"] ["200"]] Net-log: "200 TYPE is now 8-bit binary" Net-log: [ ["STOR" port/target] ["150" "125"]] Net-log: "150 Connecting to port 1263" Net-log: ["low level write of " 1 "bytes"] Net-log: [ none "226"] Net-log: "226-66555.9 Mbytes free disk space"
>> write site/test/b2 "b"
URL Parse: userid password www.site.com.au none public_html/test/ b2 ** User Error: Server error: FTP 226-File successfully transferred ** Near: write site/test/b2 "b" I'm wondering if it isn't just easier to [under Windows] do a "Map Network Drive" and then work on the remote file systems directly. Anyone had any luck with this? Regards, Ashley