[REBOL] Re: Apache
From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 22-May-2001 21:20
> The bottom line is that Command 2.0 with FastCGI provides more
functionality, better
> performance and, being part of the Command and Command/View bundle, at an
overall
> lower price than was intended with /Apache.
Ah so - I thought Apache was supposed to be ... should I dare to mention the
word? - "free" :-))
Well, OK, as for commercial application, I will probably buy /Command for my
corporation usage, but as a hobbyist, which would like to support some rebol
server scripting the price is too high. But maybe some of list members will
come with MySQL + PostGressSQL + FastCGI library wrapper and provide it a)
for free b) for some little fee ...
One specific question ot /View component being present in /Command. Today I
saw some (probably PHP based, but not sure) analyse of web accesses graphs,
and it seemed to me that it was generated dynamically, including fonts. So -
is the situation with View regarding fonts usage the same? Is absence of X
libraries really so often case? I somehow see View compositing limited, once
we can't use texts in images ...
Thanks,
-pekr-
