[REBOL] Re: LDC goes Rugby!
From: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 22-May-2001 21:49
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maarten Koopmans" <[m--koopmans2--chello--nl]>
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 8:45 PM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: LDC goes Rugby!
> Thanks Scott.
> I am surprised you are the only one that responded though. Now I'll add
> based encryption and there you go...
I saw it already yesterday and mentioned it to Carl, and today to the list.
I have printed the source code to study and I can find it pretty cool.
One thing to consider: maybe you could check/checksum the functions as being
the same? e.g. function called 'x on server doesn't necessarily have to be
the same as 'x on the client side?
I was already thinking of similar aproach, where client and server would
(just after the connection) exchange some kind of set-up info (object),
describing protocol name, protocol version, protocol compatibility version,
compression, encryption usage etc., and would be possible to exchange
dialects some way. Dialect based protocols could be cool. Imagine some
special purpose server - all you need is just domain based dialect ... but
maybe my thoughts here are not practical or applicable in any sense, as
noone replied to thoughts :-) But imo /Express uses dialect for
synchronisation purposes and there was also some link to article describing
or something similar (haven't read it though :-)
However - keep up the good work!