[REBOL] Re: Tuples - Was Pair! thread
From: chaz:innocent at: 7-Feb-2002 13:55
After reading another of your lame "oh dear, I'm sorry if I offended anyone,
how did that happen, excuse me for your misunderstanding me yet again", I
realized how very sharply your posts stand out from everyone else's.
Made me appreciate, once again, how very high the signal-to-noise is on this
list.
Thanks, Robbo, I guess.
----- Original Message -----
From: <[Robbo1Mark--aol--com]>
To: <[rebol-list--rebol--com]>
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 12:41 AM
Subject: [REBOL] Re: Tuples - Was Pair! thread
HOLGER / JEFF / EVERYBODY
After re-reading the tone of my earlier message I apologise if it came
across as offensive and flamebait
and please accept my apologies for this.
However I still think the reasoning or justification Holger gave was flawed
hence the tuple example I gave.
Sorry for any offence caused and I'll try to ensure my future mailings are
focused more on the issues at hand
rahter than being misconstrued as flamebait.
Is Pair! a lame datatype?
cheers & sorry,
Mark
In a message dated Wed, 6 Feb 2002 2:59:43 PM Eastern Standard Time, Jeff
Kreis <[jeff--rebol--net]> writes:
