Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: Tuples - Was Pair! thread

From: chaz:innocent at: 7-Feb-2002 13:55

After reading another of your lame "oh dear, I'm sorry if I offended anyone, how did that happen, excuse me for your misunderstanding me yet again", I realized how very sharply your posts stand out from everyone else's. Made me appreciate, once again, how very high the signal-to-noise is on this list. Thanks, Robbo, I guess. ----- Original Message ----- From: <[Robbo1Mark--aol--com]> To: <[rebol-list--rebol--com]> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 12:41 AM Subject: [REBOL] Re: Tuples - Was Pair! thread HOLGER / JEFF / EVERYBODY After re-reading the tone of my earlier message I apologise if it came across as offensive and flamebait and please accept my apologies for this. However I still think the reasoning or justification Holger gave was flawed hence the tuple example I gave. Sorry for any offence caused and I'll try to ensure my future mailings are focused more on the issues at hand rahter than being misconstrued as flamebait. Is Pair! a lame datatype? cheers & sorry, Mark In a message dated Wed, 6 Feb 2002 2:59:43 PM Eastern Standard Time, Jeff Kreis <[jeff--rebol--net]> writes: