[REBOL] Re: even further ... Re: Introducing REBOL/Base - FAQ
From: atruter:hih:au at: 1-Oct-2002 9:36
> For embedded and dedicated apps, /Encap should strip out unused code and
minimize size, not the /releases themselves.
Could not agree more. Leaving the naming issues aside, it seems that three
broad "flavours" of REBOL are being discussed:
1. code writers - Full development environment
2. reblet users - Expandable "player"
3. app users - Binary produced by 1) or an addition to 1) (aka Encap)
I don't consider Encap a "version" of REBOL per se as it is not a
stand-alone environment. It instead takes the output of 1) to create 3).