World: r3wp

Ok, I'll just add the PDF version then.

I just see the ... next to the right arrow flashing away

Just click it to see the image appear.

no ... I think that means it's working.  Image is a star flashing 
away

star burst

anyway it seems to be working again.

got to slide 14 .. do the X mean you've completed those tasks?

Yes, but it's 90% only for the second item.

The main missing feature is string! type read/write support.

Doc, could you add the pdf ? I can't get the presentation.

Sure, I'm currently uploading it.

thanks !

Ok done, just reload the page, you should see a PDF link below the 
slides.

ok, I got it

I've fixed all the typos in the new version. Thank you, Graham.

you're welcome

What developer channel will you use?

A web based BBS?

I'm thinking about using Google Groups...I'll do a review of possible 
options in the next days to decide.

I remember you used altme before and of course all that discussion 
is now gone ...

spam can be a problem on google groups .. not sure if that is still 
the case

I'm surprised you don't mention Cheyenne in your credits :)

There is mentioned built-in webserver.

Good catch! I did the introductory slide for the Cheyenne presentation 
first, so it wasn't necessary. Then I forgot to add it when I copy/past-ed 
the slide in Red presentation. :-)

The built-in webserver will be simplified, lightweight version of 
Cheyenne written in Red.

red_lang now has 6 followers and no tweets!

what will happen to poor r3 now? :-)

Twitter: I'll send a welcome message :-)

Pekr, R3 has been in development for .. is it 5 years now?

Evolution will decide the place for each language

I wonder as well if this means that Carl will stop completely or 
want to finish R3 asap.

Graham - it was sad irony on my part :-) I remember how I translated 
Carl's interview somewhere in 1996, when he left Viscorp, and was 
asked by Gateway, to join in and to lead Amiga. He has choosed REBOL 
instead, stating, that he wants to avoid Amiga mistakes of the past. 
Now he is effectively killing REBOL by no-action just the same way 
....

competition is good ... leads to better products

Carl has written a number of languages now .. .commercial ones, doc 
.. I don't know

Oldes - I fear that Carl closes the shop, instead of open-sourcing. 
Or - he might continue in R3 development, doing 2 releases per year, 
being still in alpha after another 5 years, and gaining some momentum 
on some vapor lists, where e.g. Amiga is being recently listed :-)

Red's MIT/BSD licensed (which? both?) so there 's no reason we can't 
work on both R3 and Red.

I don't think my announcement will change anything for R3 development. 
In fact, it might even attract more people to R3, while waiting for 
a working Red version. ;-)

The last time i looked at Paul Graham's arc, that seemed to be stalled 
as well.  the point is that this is a huge undertaking for any single 
person

Brian: I haven't choosed yet.

Thanks for the PDF doc. I had trouble with RocketSlide as well.

They can be complementary. Red is really limited (according to the 
slides), so mixed language projects could be appropriate as long 
as Red's syntax is a strict subset.

So, developers will have to choose where they want to go ... and 
there's a limited pool of rebol developers

It would even be possible to extend R3 with a Red dialect.

Graham - developers can't affect R3 Core development, not in public 
enough manner. So Red might be a testbed for R3 too ... and who knows, 
maybe Carl will be motivated to restart R3 development :-)

I hope so ...

For me, R2 is the only REBOLed product. R3 is still alpha version 
since years.
For the transition to Red, R2 is good.

the last time there was a language fork .. RT made some announcements 
to try and make rebol more attractive

BrianH: sure, why not.

yes, it was when Doc was working on R# - Carl then announced plug-ins, 
which never materialised for R2 though :-)

Doc - have you looked into Orca/Boron, if there is something usefull 
for Red? Or are those interepreter based too?