World: r3wp
[Tech News] Interesting technology
older newer | first last |
yeksoon 3-Apr-2009 [3775] | NYTimes: I.B.M. Reportedly Will Buy Rival Sun for $7 Billion (or 9.50 a share) http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/03/technology/business-computing/03blue.html?_r=1&ref=technology&pagewanted=print Still not final announcement yet. |
Maxim 3-Apr-2009 [3776] | in 20 years from now, we will be hearing a merger from software incorporated and hardware incorporated. so there will only be one company with all patents for anyting related to digital processing. and they'll say that its not an antitrust issue, cause there is another company called objects incorporated which rivals it. these mega mergers are portents that the end of capitalism is looming. just like when rome had nothing new to conquer and that made their system obsolete. capitalism NEEDs real competition. not a two way brawl of giants for which the only real hope is annexation or swatting. every merger of any company, means a lot of jobs get lost by way of cutting redundant services. one walmart might employ 200 minimum wage people, but they destroy at least as many administration and middle paying jobs. what can all the clients of sun and IBM gain from this? only the loss of a viable option to leverage in dealing lower costs for their machines, forcing IBM and sun to stay competitive. Yess... you'll say there is still other companies... but the list is growing pretty short. the industry "leaders" is starting to be more of a gang than a group. :-( |
Reichart 10-Apr-2009 [3777x2] | A while ago I posted about a2i2, they are doing adaptive A.I. I got to visit them today. They are doing some fun stuff. One of my friends is now on their team. Looks like they are just a few months away from something we can "talk to" :) |
...and, you never know, we might might find a way to allow Qtask to interact with it. | |
Pekr 10-Apr-2009 [3779] | I can even "talk to" stone, if I don't mind it will not reply :-) So actually - does their thing reply? :-) |
Reichart 10-Apr-2009 [3780] | Very well, and is even polite when you don't know what you are saying :) |
Gabriele 10-Apr-2009 [3781x2] | are they going to connect that to wolfram alpha? ;) |
now imagine you make a phone call, and this "something you can talk to" responds, and has access to google, wolfram alpha... and qtask. | |
AdrianS 10-Apr-2009 [3783] | Wow, maybe the combination of these two technologies can find a way out of the mess the financial system is in - like, "Hang the bastards that caused it!" |
Reichart 11-Apr-2009 [3784] | Very fun little movie made to show how magnetic waves might "look" (and sound). http://www.semiconductorfilms.com/root/Magnetic_Movie/Magnetic.htm |
Henrik 13-Apr-2009 [3785] | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jyBiECoS3Q Cool insect bot. One can think about why it's so much easier to build insect robots than humanoid/biped robots. |
Reichart 13-Apr-2009 [3786] | Well said. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jyBiECoS3Q |
Reichart 16-Apr-2009 [3787] | Some good news ... http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/04/090414084627.htm |
[unknown: 5] 16-Apr-2009 [3788] | That is good news. |
Geomol 16-Apr-2009 [3789] | Recently I've been speculating a lot, if it's a good idea, that humans save animals. Initially it seems like a very good idea. But fact is, that more than 90% of all species at any time have become extinct at a later time. Every time a species become extinct, it makes room for other species. Now if us people start to save species, that would else become extinct, what effect will this have over a longer time-scale? |
[unknown: 5] 16-Apr-2009 [3790] | Does it matter? Isn't the universe becoming more organized? So during this evolution we should expect more organization so what harm can be done if we are apart of it. |
Reichart 16-Apr-2009 [3791] | John, I hear there was a meeting among the animals, all I can say is, there was a vote, and "we" better make plans for another planet. |
Geomol 16-Apr-2009 [3792] | Yeah, let's take to the skies! :-) |
sqlab 17-Apr-2009 [3793] | We are adapted to a certain (now existent ?) environment. If it changes maybe we will change or get extincted too. |
Maarten 17-Apr-2009 [3794] | Reichart, that is very funny. |
Geomol 18-Apr-2009 [3795] | Future now? One step closer to Minority Report. http://www.snotr.com/video/2549 |
Graham 18-Apr-2009 [3796] | Looks like the spammers have found a way to get thru gmail's filters ... finding a lot more spam now in the last few days in my inbox. |
Reichart 18-Apr-2009 [3797] | Most of my spam comes from Germany or Italy on Gmail... |
Graham 18-Apr-2009 [3798] | No Russian ladies any more? |
[unknown: 5] 19-Apr-2009 [3799] | I get it mostly from mail.ru and gmail |
Graham 19-Apr-2009 [3800] | spam or bots ? |
[unknown: 5] 19-Apr-2009 [3801] | I don't know how to tell the difference. They simply like ot register on my sites and then leave a website link in their profile. Seems they are just looking for backlinks. |
Graham 19-Apr-2009 [3802] | bots |
Oldes 19-Apr-2009 [3803x2] | Just write your forms using JS or at least don't use common login field names like USER and PASSWORD |
but if you don't hide the submit button, they will try to insert the links into any text field. | |
[unknown: 5] 19-Apr-2009 [3805x6] | I thought of a great idea to stop forum spammers and probably others. I don't know how it can be thwarted. |
I wouldn't know how to code it but it would probably require Javascript which I don't know. | |
But that might not be a good idea. Need something almost other than javascript. | |
The idea is to use Drag and Drop. | |
The drag and drop areas always change. | |
So its random generated. | |
ICarii 19-Apr-2009 [3811] | 3D hit testing is another upcoming captcha method |
[unknown: 5] 19-Apr-2009 [3812] | How does that work? I hear that cpatcha is being beaten by OCR methods. |
ICarii 19-Apr-2009 [3813] | there are various implementations from thread-the-needle / drag-and-drop / to overlay matching and rotation |
[unknown: 5] 19-Apr-2009 [3814] | My idea involves having the backend generate a random code that gets presented as a draggable item in a javascript driven page. The user must drag the code to a randoming placed box. The code i s also randoming placed. The script will generate a value based on the direction and length of the drag. This gets compared on the server end along with the code. |
ICarii 19-Apr-2009 [3815] | cant the spammer then just read the code to get the positions? |
[unknown: 5] 19-Apr-2009 [3816] | Yeah, which is why I don't think you can do it in javascript. I'm using that as an example to get an idea for the concept. |
ICarii 19-Apr-2009 [3817] | automating mouse movement and clicks from then on is relatively trivial |
[unknown: 5] 19-Apr-2009 [3818] | Yeah might not work via that route. |
ICarii 19-Apr-2009 [3819] | the trick is to possibly send location on drop - then verify serverside |
[unknown: 5] 19-Apr-2009 [3820x2] | Yeah - that should do it! |
Dunno, you still have to show the locations on the client end so they know where to drag. | |
ICarii 19-Apr-2009 [3822x2] | send an image |
eg: drag the object onto the purple rabbit - have an image with 20 or so differentr rabbits | |
[unknown: 5] 19-Apr-2009 [3824] | Possible. |
older newer | first last |