World: r3wp
[Tech News] Interesting technology
older newer | first last |
Graham 30-Aug-2008 [2987] | Even then, we have consumer protection here ... so even if it dies after the warranty period, it can be argued that to die after 1 years use indicates that it was not for fit for the purpose for which it was sold. |
shadwolf 30-Aug-2008 [2988x3] | unfortunatly that a no brand "you are just fucked up" lcd screen ... |
well dead for dead i can affort a trip to my favorite electronics shop and by some condensator and remplace them | |
if it works I will earn 130 euros ^^ | |
Graham 30-Aug-2008 [2991x2] | Auction sites often have cheap LCD screens |
Dell dumps their excess stock on auction sites here. | |
shadwolf 30-Aug-2008 [2993] | I will replace the condensators and if it works good for me if it doesn't well it doesn't ... |
Graham 30-Aug-2008 [2994] | condensors |
shadwolf 30-Aug-2008 [2995x2] | condom soars ? |
muaaaaawhaaaaaaaahahahaha | |
Graham 30-Aug-2008 [2997] | how many babies do you have? |
shadwolf 30-Aug-2008 [2998x3] | none ... |
that's a pity those condensors .... the whole screen is new and working well apart the pump efect on starting | |
once the condensors are charged if I turn on/off the screen it worst without problem | |
Anton 31-Aug-2008 [3001] | shadwolf, is "Syntoma" the brand of the LCD monitor ? Having to wait 5 - 10 minutes before seeing a picture would be a waste of time. Are you sure you cannot get your supplier to replace it ? If you can fix it, that is good, but you have not earned any money. You will have lost both money and time. |
Kaj 31-Aug-2008 [3002x5] | That's what happens with no-name stuff |
I used to have a computer store and I quickly noticed that many products just look like the products they're supposed to be, but really aren't | |
Case in point: it may look like a display, but if it doesn't display a picture, it really isn't | |
The most interesting example were the floppy disks that were sold everywhere at the end of the era of floppy disks. People didn't want to spend anything on them any more, so you could store files on them and quite consistently, a month later they would be gone | |
It was actually quite hard to find good ones. People get what they deserve | |
Henrik 31-Aug-2008 [3007] | I think some of my original Amiga floppies still work, but the last PC floppies I bought were utter crap. |
Anton 31-Aug-2008 [3008] | Kaj, "People get what they deserve" - that seems a rather odd conclusion to me. |
shadwolf 31-Aug-2008 [3009x2] | . anton no Syntoma = symptom |
tomorow i'mgoing to disassembly the monitor and replace the condensors near the transformer | |
Kaj 1-Sep-2008 [3011x2] | Anton, why odd? If people want the cheapest, they get what looks cheapest at that moment. It may just not be cheapest in the long run |
If you consider quality in the long run, you usually get quality in the long run | |
shadwolf 1-Sep-2008 [3013x4] | hum but the problem is productivity and rentability are against quality... |
now in day the pity is that they sell you crap for price of gold ... | |
if most of the lcd monitors crafters offer a 3 year waranty that's because they are aware their monitor will fail from lacks of fiability in their components. Doing fast and lot of monney implicates they have to cut cost on every thing... | |
so instead of putting in the lcd monitors chimical condensors of 25 V 1000 µF they put 16 V 1000 µF instead of redunding them they just put the just the simple amount of condensors. Instead of putting quality condensors wich cost 0.60 cts they put low quality condensors at 0.20 cts ... then because you have no redundency on the power supply you don't have backup in the main power supply and if one of the condensors is dead you just have to throw it to junk .... | |
Anton 1-Sep-2008 [3017x3] | Kaj, I would agree that the tendency to buy the cheaper of otherwise identical-looking items is something that tends to drive the market quality downwards, but I don't agree that that is what "people" deserve. |
I could imagine the situation this way; on introduction to the market, floppy disk manufacturers were fewer, and prices were higher, so the competition was about quality. Later, more manufacturers entered the market and caused a price war. Consumers became confused and couldn't distinguish brands by quality, so they chose the cheaper "alternatives". I could say, then, that the manufacturers which chose to lower the quality of their products in order to undercut their competition were slowly degrading the public's idea of the quality of a floppy disk. Essentially lying, by taking advantage of trust in all the confusion. | |
[Disclaimer: The above is just an alternative explanation. I haven't studied the actual history of floppy disks at all, and I never ran a computer store.] | |
Henrik 1-Sep-2008 [3020x2] | I think many manufacturers choose to lower the quality of their products, because they learn how to produce an almost identical product at a lower cost. Philips VCRs went from being innovative and high quality in the 80s and early 90s and slowly became of poorer and poorer quality over the years until they became as unreliable as the cheapest crap you could find. But I bet it would cost about 1/10 to produce that crap VCR than the old high quality one. Finetuning a production line down to the last dime is a science in itself and you can bet they take advantage of it. |
Maybe you could compare it to floppies. Floppies were a dying technology an so the priority for producing good ones was just lowered. | |
Robert 1-Sep-2008 [3022x7] | Well, my 2cents, after doing procurement consulting for 9 years now. |
Cheaper = worse quality is an equation that doesn't hold always. The main causes for lower prices while keeping the same quality are: | |
1. productivity gains: You use better machines, less scrap, less time -> lower costs per part | |
2. Learning effects: Suppliers learn how something can be produced better, with less effort etc. For example injection molding parts are optimized mainly through this. | |
3. Economy of scale: If I produce a product in 1 shift, but can get contracts for a 2nd and 3rd shift I can dramatically lower my costs -> lower product price. | |
Lowering the quality is a very bad option for a supplier. Especially you can only do this if you sell directly to the end-market. Otherwise your client won't accept lowe quality. | |
Nevertheless you have scrap out there and the chances are high with real no-names. But this comes from a lot of them think, some products are easy to manufactor. But this is not the case. Building a real good washing machine like a Miele is everything than simple. Even if you disassemble the machine you are not able to clone it. | |
TomBon 1-Sep-2008 [3029] | ...interesting, why not robert? I never understood this fact and heard it many times by business owner when talking about the danger of cloned products. |
Henrik 1-Sep-2008 [3030x3] | Robert, I agree that purposely lowering quality of products only works with end-users. |
TomBon, to clone a Miele, one would need the same materials, production processes and suppliers as Miele use. Basically you would need their production facilities and engineers. And I know that people's image of Miele is of their reliability, not their product design or by them having low prices. Reliability is the hardest part to clone, so people would naturally be suspicious about a cloned Miele. Cloned, cheaper spare parts may be a different matter. | |
One place where buying a clone might be a serious mistake is the case for some Chinese luxury cars. They look like any other luxury car, but are built on 30-40 year old chassis frames using substandard quality steel and are some of the worst performers in crash tests, and many warnings have been issued against buying them. They don't yet have the capacity to produce cars that live up to modern safety standards. The cars are not directly clones, but it's enough to get confused by, if you want a big fancy car. | |
Graham 1-Sep-2008 [3033x4] | http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/01/AR2008090101614.html New google browser ... goodbye Firefox?? |
New google browser that uses multiple cores and javascript threads with sandboxing between tabs. | |
is this the end of FF? | |
And new platform to develop applications I guess. | |
older newer | first last |