World: r3wp

dunno .. at present I'm only using the Mac to watch House MD that 
I've downloaded ...

make sure that no mouse gestures are enabled for dashboard then.

you can do that in system preferences

If an artist or label wants to sell music on iTunes with no DRM, 
Apple won't do it. There are documented cases for this, for which 
I am too lazy to provide a link.

Ok, that sounds like something I should do ...

BrianH, it might be a contractual issue. I'd bet that those contracts 
are rather hairy.

VLC keeps crashing with an error requester if I keep using the remote 
to pause the movie .. to explain to my daughter some esoteric medical 
thing ..!

At least Safari seems stable ... not like Firefox on Windows

VLC under OSX is unfortunately very unstable. it's annoying.

graham, since v1.5 firefox has never crashed for me, when it used 
to crash about 5 times a day beforehand.  v2 seems even better.

better than 0 crashes? :D

hehe... v2 seems to have less "issues" which are not related to crashes... 
refresh bugs and things like that  :-)

although I dont like MS...  this is not a just ruling !
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/02/23/microsoft_alcatel_patent/

Adobe to take Photoshop online - http://news.com.com/2100-7345_3-6163015.html

http://xdev.org/etoile/<--- Etoilé desktop live CD available

Henrik - what is etoile?

it's a kind of a desktop... it claims to want to change the way one 
works with applications and documents. I haven't figured out how 
this works yet. The reason I'm interested in it is that it's GNUstep 
based.

Javascript port of Markdown -> http://www.attacklab.net/showdown-gui.html

We really need stable Rebol plugin:(

Oldes, I have a commercial app online and its one of the most advanced 
scripts I've ever written.  it does web-service access in the bg 
doing sync of ui with a remote app (much like altme) , in the same 
time it crawls the net, does searching and allows you to download 
actual content when you ask for it... all simultaneously and using 
glayout too...

as many have said before... R2 and current plugin are great tools. 
 why are you keeping from using them?

Maxim  - damned proxy support!

ah

... and we were SO close. Josh had it solved, then he announced Carl 
redirected him to something else, then he was about to post some 
security related doc - that never happened.

well that's not just the plugin then.

(proxy)

I agree that the no 1 problem of RT is not the technology... it the 
management of priorites and schedules and stuff like that.

hum... starting to make me thing of another great technology which 
had the same issues... yet was 10 years in advance ;-)

just like REBOL

(amiga anyone)

at least we know the reasons are not the same and that RT itself 
is good willed.

just need more indians ... but not enough food to feed them I guess.

Hi,

Skype has a worm now...


http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2007/04/16/tech-securitymsskypewindowszonealarm-20070416.html

In case you haven't seen it yet...

oh dear

you still have to click on it...

Microsoft has given a go-to-market name for its cross-platform, cross-browser 
plug-in for delivering the next generation of user experiences and 
rich Internet applications for the Web. The technology formerly known 
as WPF/E is now known as Silverlight - http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2114418,00.asp

with R3... I think they might have another competitor they are not 
aware of yet  ;-)

then let's hope some of View issues are adressed (keyboard, make 
events (Gabriele confirmed this one), refresh rate, rich text, etc.)

pekr, since should  be able to fix most of those ourselves (for those 
who need to address the issues for real),  then I see R3 as a bright 
beacon in my future.

I've already been thinking of doing some integration with .net.

it is a pity Carl does not visit altme from time to time. I miss 
blog capability of "suggest a blog topic", which was promissed a 
bit ... I would like to know, what's in the pipe for View ... will 
Desktop be enhanced? Reworked? Removed? The same goes for VID - should 
it be part of View? Or an external module? Should View contain only 
generic gfx functions? (kind of face)

.net just cause it would help me push rebol into more use.

AFAICT its like the sdk, you can choose, enhance, but now we will 
also have access to lower levels.  the desktop source has been available 
for years and very little real community support exists.  we mostly 
do not care to much for the desktop.

its a good start point, but its not enough... just the user management 
is enough to make it almost useless in corporate places.

since I don't need it I've never fixed it, but it would be pretty 
easy to just make sure the user is the actual user logon so that 
any configs are really the user's (and can be right-protected by 
admins)

I agree, that is why I ask - is there any strategy for View product? 
That is not question to RT themselves,but also to us ...

this kind of thing is what prevents REBOL use in many situations... 
the details for programmers are paramount for managers.

which is why I have been thinking much more like a manager and an 
end-user lately.

I still can see browser plug-in as important for RT's strategy, but 
we have not seen Josh's doc, which should be out soon ;-) (xy months 
ago)

(for the development of elixir)