World: r3wp

yeah, a little

but what else ?

i see nothing

Another aspect I like about Rebol is the community.

yeah, we are cool guys

The fact it's small and courageous. You side with the losers.

:)

by the way, it's not the good place for such comments

In what sense?

Runtime Core - Closed: This is the OS independent kernel that provides 
standard REBOL capabilities across all systems and devices. It is 
this component that makes REBOL operate identically on Windows, OSX, 
Linux, BSD, Sony, Nokia, Nintendo, and other systems.
-from the above document.

in sense that we should move from Rebol/flash dialect thread

to Vent?

Host Environment - Open: The environment defines an operating system 
abstraction layer (OSAL) that can be ported to a wide range of systems, 
including desktop systems, set-top boxes, mobile devices, and cell 
phones. This approach gives developers a way to run and improve REBOL 
on their specific target platforms.
-from same document

Oldes, would it be possible to have a version running with /core 
?

with some modifications yes... I'm not using it with Core

Will: I'm guessing that you meant a version running with /core under 
OS X.

PeterWood: Right, as posted in OSX group /view doesn't work in 10.5/intel

Oldes: me I ask? 8)

Will: When I tried to load the latest version of RWSF under Mac OS 
X it failed as it calls a Windows DLL.

Thanks for the info Peter! and read-thru is only in /view right?

read-thru is certainly not in core 2.6.2.

The windows dll called by RWSF is Zlib

there should not be zlib anymore.. it was used for decompress anyway.

read-thru can be in core without problems

what I'm not sure is how struct! is supported in core

There should be also some change in image loader, but this could 
be done in core way anyway... this part of code is pretty old... 
2002 or something like that

COOOL !! Got swf8-convolution1.swf building on /core (OSX) ! How 
great this is 8) thanks Oldes!

Keep on your project Oldes! That's a very good one. As Pekr mentioned, 
made with Rebol, run with Adobe. That means Rebol may not even need 
a plugin eventually. And for the ones who think alternative solutions 
are not for them, ask yourself what you're doing here! You're at 
the wrong place! Go to MacDo and Pizza Hut, install Vista and don't 
forget to buy an iPhone!

I've putted together the missing functions in /core 2.7.5, taken 
from /view in the swf-in-core.r file, try this:
move to the appropriate directory, then:
do http://reboot.ch/rebol/swf/swf-on-core.r

make-swf/save/html http://box.lebeda.ws/~hmm/rswf/examples/swf8/swf8-convolution1.rswf

Oldes, where can I find the tracer.swf file that is included in this 
example?
http://box.lebeda.ws/~hmm/rswf/examples/swf8/swf8-iconlist.rswf

WOW 8)

can someone with a camand flash installed, confirm if this example 
work please?
http://box.lebeda.ws/~hmm/rswf/example/mx-webcam

Oldes, how can I keep images external from the generated flash, for 
example this one http://box.lebeda.ws/~hmm/rswf/gui/GUI_Arrows.rswf
? thx!

ok found the tracer.rswf here http://box.lebeda.ws/~hmm/rswf/includes/tracer.rswf

if you want use different image, just change the path. Now it uses 
this image http://box.lebeda.ws/~hmm/rswf/gui/img/arrows.png

because I use core which has no image support, I'd like to not embed 
the images, but have them loaded at tuntime, who would I do this?

who = How

As I said I can make image loader which don't use view functions

Do you want to use this arrow or different?

That would be grat!

the compiler cou use precompiled image data which are here read/binary 
http://box.lebeda.ws/~hmm/rswf/gui/img/arrows.png.36

this arrow is fine, but I would need an example how to change examples 
where there are images that get embedded to keep them outise and 
load at runtime

ah.. you need change image from swf itself

If you want to change it from SWF itself, just use loadMovie

as an exampe, in GUI_Arrows.swf there is this line:
bitmaps images [alpha %gui/img/arrows.png]
with what can I replace it?

this places the image during compilation

why do you want to change it in runtime?

so I can run examples with embedded images, but if you are going 
to make it run in core that would be great and I'll have no need 
for that

I think that it's better to have the images embedded. Whu do you 
want to stress server to provide so many reqyest like to get image 
which has 123 bytes?

It's impressively fast!! 8)