World: r3wp
[Linux] group for linux REBOL users
older newer | first last |
Kaj 22-Dec-2009 [3449] | It's the only init script in the .deb packages |
Oldes 22-Dec-2009 [3450] | thanks.. I found it there:) |
Kaj 22-Dec-2009 [3451] | Did you manage to unpack it? |
Oldes 22-Dec-2009 [3452] | I downloaded tar.gz |
Kaj 22-Dec-2009 [3453x2] | Oh, the source. It's probably not a problem here, but it's a bit dangerous because the source file may need processing |
I just found out that the .deb distribution packages are in a weird format: ancient ar format which contains a few .tar.gz files | |
Oldes 22-Dec-2009 [3455x2] | hm... I still have problems.. the file is missing LSB information :/ |
it's probably wrong file. | |
Kaj 22-Dec-2009 [3457x2] | Try the .deb package that is closest to your Postfix version and Debian version |
Unpack it with ar similar to how tar works | |
Oldes 22-Dec-2009 [3459] | yes.. this one looks better :) |
Pekr 29-Dec-2009 [3460] | has anyone written syntax hilighter for Gedit? (Default Gnome Editor)? I don't need it, but my friend who starts using REBOL asked, and I am not following this topic properly. So - in case you know someone who has it, please suggest :-) |
Robert 29-Dec-2009 [3461x4] | Is anyone familiar with the debootstrap process? I used it to setup a Lenny that I can use via CHROOT, which works. Now I want to make it bootable. I added it to GRUB and can boot into the version. But I can't get the network up & running. |
I have spend most of the day to find out how to setup a network. I have done most things: - /etc/networks/interfaces has an entry for eth0 - /etc/networks strangly only contains if-up.d/ - I'm somehow missing /etc/init.d/networking but don't know how to install it or why it's missing | |
The eth0 interface is there but has no IP address assigned, and route -n is empty. | |
IMO there is not a lot missing but I don't know how to fix it. | |
Kaj 29-Dec-2009 [3465] | Sounds like half the infrastructure is missing. It's no wonder it doesn't work |
Gabriele 30-Dec-2009 [3466x2] | you need to chroot and install more packages, I guess. you need to do an actual installation, and not just a bootstrap. |
alternatively, you can configure the network manually :-) | |
Anton 4-Jan-2010 [3468] | On the Free Software Foundation site I read about gNewSense linux based on Debian. The gNewSense Laptop and Netbook Guide http://wiki.gnewsense.org/Main/LaptopGuide#toc1 lists a laptop, the Lemote YeeLoong http://www.tekmote.nl Has anyone seen or tried this laptop? |
Kaj 4-Jan-2010 [3469] | Only read about it. They're among the lowest-end netbooks, but interesting |
Maxim 20-Jan-2010 [3470] | can anyone tell me why... on linux... (running debian) everytime I launch rebol, I get two processes? 3156 3156 3016 pts/1 00:00:00 rebbase 3157 3156 3016 pts/1 00:00:00 rebbase one is parent of the other. this happens no matter what rebol I launch... command, core or view. |
Graham 20-Jan-2010 [3471x2] | dns |
it's the dns helper process. | |
Gabriele 20-Jan-2010 [3473] | rebol forks to be able to use gethostbyname() asynchronously (dns:///async) |
Dockimbel 1-Feb-2010 [3474] | Does anyone have a solution to run encapped 2.7.6 View on Ubuntu 9.04 or 9.10? I'm stuck with our new server, Cheyenne binary (with built-in View) requires libstdc++.so.5 which is obsolete. Making a symlink to .so.6 doesn't work. |
Henrik 1-Feb-2010 [3475] | obsolete: can't Ubuntu tell the difference between the two libraries and keep both? |
Dockimbel 1-Feb-2010 [3476] | I've found the Debian package for libstdc++.so.5 but it needs an older version of gcc (3.3) that I can't manage to install on 9.04 without messing up the system. |
Henrik 1-Feb-2010 [3477] | interesting |
Dockimbel 1-Feb-2010 [3478x2] | I'm not able to get a correct installation of libstdc++.so.5 deb package, it messes up the gcc lib dependencies. |
Maybe I should really drop View support completly in Cheyenne. | |
Henrik 1-Feb-2010 [3480] | I do think that it would make cheyenne installation much easier. |
Dockimbel 1-Feb-2010 [3481x2] | I guess that a 2.7.7 SDK should have cured that, View 2.7.7 seems to link to .so.6. |
I've always thought that a gfx engine built in Cheyenne would have brought a nice added value, but it seems that using View is just too much trouble on anything else than Windows. | |
Graham 1-Feb-2010 [3483] | Send Carl a priority feedback ... |
Janko 1-Feb-2010 [3484] | for windows it's very nice to have a taskbar icon and all, but when you run on server I want no view.. I have just command line on all servers anyways |
Graham 1-Feb-2010 [3485x2] | so how do you interact with running servers? |
browser interface? | |
Janko 1-Feb-2010 [3487] | I don't interact.. are there any interaction possible (I know for reload config and restart workers on windows) |
Dockimbel 1-Feb-2010 [3488x3] | My intent with providing a View kernel for Cheyenne was to use it as a general purpose image generation library. But as it fails to accomplish the most basic job of making decent thumbnails, and is quite painfull to run when the required dependencies are not satisfied, it's maybe better to get rid of it. |
are there any interaction possible (I know for reload config and restart workers on windows) Similar interactions are possible on all platforms. For non-Windows systems, use signals : - reload config: kill -HUP <cheyenne-pid> - reset workers: kill -USR1 <cheyenne-pid> - quit: kill <cheyenne-pid> (or CTRL-C if running in foreground) | |
Graham: thanks, I'll try that...I thought that SDKs are supposed to be released with each new R2 version? | |
Graham 1-Feb-2010 [3491] | supposed to be ... |
Oldes 1-Feb-2010 [3492] | For thumbnails I have Imagick binding.. But I must test it with Cheyenne yet. |
Graham 1-Feb-2010 [3493x2] | I just use call with imagemagick ... opn cheyenne |
but windows though | |
Dockimbel 1-Feb-2010 [3495] | CALL on a third party exe works, but that's not a solution able to scale high (not talking about the induced delay of creating and closing a process) |
Rebolek 2-Feb-2010 [3496x2] | I've download latest REBOL in Xubuntu. Viewtop opened without problem but when I switched to console, nothing appeared. Because I deselected "show desktop on startup", now I cannot start REBOL at all. Any ideas? |
At least I can run it from console. But I still wonder why it does not work from icon. | |
amacleod 2-Feb-2010 [3498] | There is no console for linux...must use linux console. |
older newer | first last |