World: r3wp
[MySQL]
older newer | first last |
Graham 12-Dec-2008 [1052x3] | just installed mysql on ubuntu 8.1 but can't login ... |
get "Access denied for user ['root'-:-'localhost'] (using password: No ) | |
I thought root was automatically created with no password?? | |
Dockimbel 13-Dec-2008 [1055] | What does read dns://127.0.0.1 give you? It may be related to a mismatch in the localhost name mapping, so you have to add access rights for root@... (or [root-:-127-:-0-:-0-:-1]) in MySQL to workaround that issue. |
Graham 13-Dec-2008 [1056] | I think that someone had setup a password ... so I purged mysql, deleted my.cnf and reinstalled. That worked. |
Gabriele 18-Dec-2008 [1057x5] | Doc, the read-packet function in mysql-protocol.r is missing one word in the /local list. Line 538: |
read-packet: func [port [port!] /local packet-len pl status][ | |
should be: | |
read-packet: func [port [port!] /local packet-len pl status tmp][ | |
(mysql-protocol-41.r) | |
Dockimbel 18-Dec-2008 [1062] | Thanks for the report, I'll fix that in the next beta release. There's also other fixes from Will pending. |
ManuM 23-Dec-2008 [1063] | . . |
[unknown: 5] 23-Dec-2008 [1064] | I have installed mySQL and Oracle as part of my studies for improving TretbaseDB. I'm curious from others that use mySQL with REBOL as to what they dislike about the interoperablility or what they like most about it. |
amacleod 13-Jan-2009 [1065] | I'm trying to upload a binary (image) file to a mysql DB. When I retrieve it teh binary data seems to have changed and I can not display the image. I was able to do it with sqlite with no problem. I'm using the mediumblob field type for the image data... Any ideas what I might be doing wrong? |
Will 13-Jan-2009 [1066] | ca you diff the binary data of the image before you send it to db and after retriving it? also once the data is inserted thru mysql-protocol can you retrive the image from the db with another client and see if it works? |
amacleod 13-Jan-2009 [1067] | diff? |
Will 13-Jan-2009 [1068x4] | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diff |
can you diff.. | |
btw, I suggest not to store images in the db, store it somewhere on your hardrive and put in the db a pointer to the file, if you really need it and do not find ehat's wrong, ping me in the weekend and I can test that here, althougt I use other binary data with mysql-protocol with no problem, not sure if it apply but check also encodings for mysql storage, etc | |
ehat -> what | |
amacleod 13-Jan-2009 [1072] | I got it.... I have to convert it back to binary. ("to-binary") I assumed that if I was giving it a binary file it would remain in binary just as sqlite treated it....The field attributes state "binary". Thanks for the help, Will! |
Davide 1-Mar-2009 [1073] | Is there a MySQL guru around ? I need to optimize this query: SELECT A.cod, A.date , SUM(B.amount) AS amount, COUNT( * ) AS numrow FROM A INNER JOIN A AS B ON A.cod=B.cod AND B.date <= A.date WHERE A.cod IS NOT NULL GROUP BY A.cod, A.date This return "running sums" (partial sum for every date and every cod). Both cod and date are indexed. In a table of about 100'000 records it takes 104 sec to complete while in SQL server 2005 (the same query, on the same data, on the same index ) it takes 3 sec ! I've tried to use MyIsam, InnoDB, MEMORY storage, and used BOTH btree and hash index. I've tried to FORCE Index for Join and Group too. Any suggest ? |
Oldes 2-Mar-2009 [1074] | is there any reason why you join A on A? also.. have you tried to EXPLAIN the query? http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/explain.html |
Davide 2-Mar-2009 [1075] | > is there any reason why you join A on A? If I have these records: cod date amount A 2009/03/01 10 A 2009/03/03 30 A 2009/03/04 20 A 2009/03/07 5 B 2009/03/02 17 B 2009/03/10 5 That query give me the sum of previous amounts for every date/cod: cod date amount NumRow A 2009/03/01 10 1 A 2009/03/03 40 2 A 2009/03/04 60 3 A 2009/03/07 65 4 B 2009/03/02 17 1 B 2009/03/10 22 2 I don't know if there's a better method without using join > also.. have you tried to EXPLAIN the query? Yes, explain returns that the correct indices are used. Not very informative. |
Maarten 2-Mar-2009 [1076] | Davide, first: NULL value are evil (as are duplicate rows).My guess the cost is the fact that your query probably runs a fulll table scan as it needs to sum all of the rows... So table partitioning will help a lot. My guess is also that Oracl, SQL Server and perhaps PostGreSQL are smarter with their table optimziers and query rewriters. HTH |
BrianH 2-Mar-2009 [1077] | Also, change the count(*) to count(1), so MySQL doesn't push the full contents of the join through the count processor. |
Davide 2-Mar-2009 [1078] | > My guess is also that Oracl, SQL Server and perhaps PostGreSQL are smarter with their table optimziers and query rewriters Postgres is about 2 times faster than MySQL in this query, but the execution time grow alot as num of records increase. So I really don't know how good is compared to MySQL. Oracle, I would try, but I have no time :-P > Also, change the count(*) to count(1) Thanks, good one. The real tables will be more large (5 M record or more), so small optimizations would be not sufficient I'm tryng a different approach, using one simple stored function: create function running_total (cod VARCHAR(50), adder DECIMAL) RETURNS DECIMAL BEGIN IF @last_cod <> cod THEN BEGIN SET @running_total = 0; SET @last_cod = cod; SET @num_row = 0; END; END IF; SET @running_total = @running_total + adder; SET @num_row = @num_row + 1; RETURN @running_total; END and using as select: SET @last_cod = ''; SET @running_total = 0; SET @num_row = 0; SELECT cod , date, running_total(cod , amount), @num_row FROM a ORDER BY cod, date; This approach seems really fast : processing and inserting 100'000 records took less than 1 sec. instead of 281,73 sec. with SQL join |
DideC 30-Mar-2009 [1079] | I have a new mysql server but I can't connect to it with %mysql-protocol v1.2.1 : >> open mysql://user:[traiteur-:-localhost]/testjmg connecting to: localhost ** User Error: ERROR 1251 : Client does not support authentication protocol requested by server; consider upgrading MySQL client ** Near: open mysql://user:[traiteur-:-localhost]/testjmg I know I have to change something in the mysql server configuration, but does anyone can point me to what it is ? |
Pekr 30-Mar-2009 [1080] | there are two types of authentication schemes ... IIRC, onwards from 4.1 or 4.0.1 mysql switched to stronger authentication. So - if you upgraded or used older DBs, you have to explicitly set old auth method ... |
DideC 30-Mar-2009 [1081] | It's MySQL - 5.0.51a Do you know how to do that ? |
Dockimbel 30-Mar-2009 [1082x4] | I'm using 5.0.18 and don't have such issues. Anyway to find a fix, have a look here : http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/old-client.html |
Start mysqld with the --old-passwords option. seems the simpliest way to workaround that. | |
Btw, you should check if your code is not using an older version of %mysql-protocol.r (just in case you're reusing old source files). | |
Just installed 5.0.77 community server on Windows, no problem to log in using default password mode with mysql protocol v1.2.1. | |
DideC 30-Mar-2009 [1086x4] | OK, old-password is off in the server variable. Do you know where is the config file where this variables are sets (Ubuntu) ? |
Client version is the last one. | |
(I just look at the variable in phpmyadmin. | |
Does protocol v1.2.1 works with new password method ? If so, maybe I just need to update the user password int he db ?* | |
Dockimbel 30-Mar-2009 [1090x2] | v1.2.1 is supposed to work with both old and new passwords. |
MySQL config file (my.cnf) can be in one of these places : - /etc/ - $HOME/ - MySQL data folder | |
DideC 1-Apr-2009 [1092] | Ok, it works now. My bad, I put the last protocol in a folder but I where still loading the old one from another folder ! |
amacleod 17-Apr-2009 [1093x3] | Can you create a database remotely? Anyone know the syntax? I tried: insert db [create-db "test2"] with db=port but does not seem to work |
Is there a limit to the number of tables in a database? | |
Anyone know SOP for this situation: I have hundreds of users (not yet really) )and I need to store several tables of user data for each. Should I create a seperate database for each user or is it better to use a naming scheme for the tables and store all of them in one database? or is it just personal preference? | |
Oldes 17-Apr-2009 [1096x4] | insert db "SELECT * FROM user" |
insert db "CREATE DATABASE test2" | |
forget the first one:) | |
I don't know details, but I think one database should be enough | |
amacleod 17-Apr-2009 [1100x2] | Thanks olds...I think that will making everything simpler for me too. |
Oldes | |
older newer | first last |