World: r3wp
[!AltME] Discussion about AltME
older newer | first last |
Pekr 18-Jul-2005 [691] | Servant? I prefer Total Commander - well, I am used to it, that is all ... |
Robert 18-Jul-2005 [692] | Take a look at Salamander, much cooler, smoother than TC. Salamander is one of the best tools I know. |
Pekr 18-Jul-2005 [693] | OK, I will take a look. I looked into it briefly some three or so years ago, but it did not feature FTP, so I left it ... |
Robert 18-Jul-2005 [694] | It now has FTP |
yeksoon 18-Jul-2005 [695x2] | >>me<< also a Salamander user |
and they have SFTP as well | |
Luca 1-Aug-2005 [697] | Is AltMe working fine thru proxy servers? Today I tryed to use it at work but I couldn't connect. |
Graham 1-Aug-2005 [698] | doesn't work for me thru a proxy server |
Luca 1-Aug-2005 [699] | :-( You answered to all my doubts. |
Ingo 3-Aug-2005 [700x2] | RE: discussion on AltME in Accounts group ... Hi Reichart: no, small trusted groups aren't bad. Only planning for them is - if you are not 100% sure that you will grow. And yes, Volker and Petr said it all. |
that you will NEVER grow | |
shadwolf 5-Aug-2005 [702] | Now that we have MacOSX version of rebol/View when do is it scheduled to release an ALTME Client for MAcOSX ? |
Henrik 5-Aug-2005 [703x2] | we do? where? :-) |
oh, found it! | |
Pekr 5-Aug-2005 [705] | where? :-) |
Henrik 5-Aug-2005 [706] | http://www.rebol.net/builds/024/plus a big ALPHA qyality warning on the files page |
Pekr 5-Aug-2005 [707] | ah, yes, rebview beta - nice ... |
shadwolf 5-Aug-2005 [708] | MAC OSX REBOL/VIEW : http://www.rebol.net/builds/024/rebview1300124b |
Pekr 5-Aug-2005 [709x2] | ah, strange mimetype - mozilla displays me binary junk, instead of offering me download ... |
rebview1300124b | |
shadwolf 5-Aug-2005 [711] | this shows we are on hollydays because this primordial information have not been displayed to ppl |
Henrik 5-Aug-2005 [712] | it's been there for two days. why was this not announced in Announce? |
Pekr 5-Aug-2005 [713] | so, guys, not having OX-X here ... could you give it a test drive and post onto OS-X group here? |
shadwolf 5-Aug-2005 [714] | Because Hollydays I guess |
Pekr 5-Aug-2005 [715] | Holy-days? :-) OS-X version finally coming? :-) |
Henrik 5-Aug-2005 [716] | ok, I've already found a bug :-) User setup doesn't scroll |
Pekr 5-Aug-2005 [717x2] | maybe because Mac's mouse does not have scroll button? :-) |
let's move reports to OS-X group ... | |
Sunanda 6-Aug-2005 [719] | Reichart 24-mar: <<So our next update is coming along, aside from any features we are planning to include in the next build of AltME, we are looking for a new top 10 list of features or bugs for an interim release. >> Any more news on this, please? |
Gabriele 6-Aug-2005 [720x2] | not announced... because it's alpha stage. still in development, and missing very important features (i.e. face/rate does NOT work yet) |
anyway, altme requires the sdk, not just view. :) | |
Sunanda 7-Aug-2005 [722] | Thanks. But that's a little confusing. The March announcement was not tied to View13 (it explicitly exluded the recycle bug for which a new version of View was needed). It was an announcement, if I read it right, of an interim release on the existing SDK. |
[unknown: 9] 10-Aug-2005 [723] | Yup, we need SDK. for OSX As to the next update, we are holding it this time to get a bunch of stuff done. It is more efficient. |
Sunanda 14-Aug-2005 [724] | I think we may have different definitions of efficient. To me, using a bit of software as buggy as Altme is not efficient - which is why I've never felt able to recommend it as groupware (see earlier dicussion). I've been joining in with the REBOLn worlds because it is useful, though painful at times. The problem, of course, isn't the bugs. It's the rate at which they get fixed. |
[unknown: 9] 15-Aug-2005 [725] | Agreed. |
james_nak 17-Aug-2005 [726] | Is anyone running Altme on a Mac under the PC emulator? |
Tomc 18-Aug-2005 [727] | bug: on linux I am able to accidently paste into a posted message and obbliterate my copy of the message, restarting does noot help becausr it is an old message and is not resynced even though it is different than it is elsewhere |
Ladislav 20-Aug-2005 [728] | to Reichart: have a look at the RAMBO group and see my findings about the GC crash, I think, that the workaround there can be applied to AltME too |
Anton 22-Aug-2005 [729] | The other day, I cut off my dialup connection about 10 seconds after starting AltME. The next day I connected, looked in Advocacy group and there were no new messages. I posted a message, and then it synced about 10 messages that had occurred during the intervening time. Just a bit more feedback on this problem.. in case it helps. I usually don't notice any such sync problem. |
Sunanda 22-Aug-2005 [730] | It's a common problem -- Just yesterday I got a week's worth of messages from the Sound group. I think it resynced because I happened to be connected when someone sent a message to that group. If I hadn't been, it'd still look like Sound was silent. |
Anton 22-Aug-2005 [731] | Maybe once you screw your sync, it stays screwed ? I will watch and see if it happens to me, but I have noticed it very occasionally and so it seems the problem doesn't stick with me. |
Sunanda 22-Aug-2005 [732] | It used to be fixable by logging on as guest. But that account no longer exists on this world. A dot in the dot group may help. I've tried various things -- like creating a new group & immeditaley deleting it. But I've not found anuthing that forces a resync. The bottom line is Altme is flakey at delivering messages to some users. |
[unknown: 9] 22-Aug-2005 [733] | Ladislav, yeah....we know, we are still waiting for the next update to do everything at teh same time. |
Sunanda 23-Aug-2005 [734] | The only solution I believe would curently work is to put a dot in every group every day. That would reduce usabilty for those who don't have the problem, but increase it for those who do. |
Graham 23-Aug-2005 [735] | How about sign up for an alternate login? |
Sunanda 23-Aug-2005 [736] | We think alike -- I asked for that back on 11-jul in this group. No response. Maybe it breaks the TOS...I can certainly see issues from an administrator's viewpoint. A single resync id with a password available on request for those who need it.....That would work, I think. |
Brock 24-Aug-2005 [737] | Reichart, just wondering with the world of IM clients getting more and more cluttered with Google's Chat application. And with enhancements coming to AltME, QTask etc. Are you able to give us any feedback to some of the plans for AltME or other apps with respect to your IM future? Specifically I was wondering if other IM communication standards are going to be integrated so we are not an island of private chat? Of course, having the option to not be a private world in some situations is a great option. I see that most IM services today are going to a smart-client (x-internet) type application requiring software install. Maybe Prolific's plan (I believe I recall anyway) to provide both a smart-client/web-client will be a plus. With Google generating IM chatter in the computer world, just hope you don't miss the boat and can make an impact in the IM world when you release your updated product(s). |
[unknown: 9] 24-Aug-2005 [738] | We are planning to support open standards directly. Google is supporting an open standard, so we will be compatible. |
Henrik 1-Sep-2005 [739] | Performance issue with copying links: Set number of messages per group to a big number, say 5-10000, go to the View group and copy a link. It reacts very slowly before the OK dialog comes up. Click OK and it takes a few seconds to disappear. Now copy some ordinary text by rightclicking on a chat entry, no performance problems. |
Sunanda 4-Sep-2005 [740] | Anton: <Maybe once you screw your sync, it stays screwed ?> That seems most likely -- unless you happen to be online at the moment someone else posts a message to the out-of-sync group. That seems to resync it. One way of telling if some of your groups are out of sync is to compare with the mirror at http://www.rebol.net/altweb/rebol3/ (only works for [web-public] groups, and only if the archive is not suffering from syncing problems). I can see right now, for example, that I haven't been sent the last 9 messages in [Tech News] |
older newer | first last |