World: r3wp
[!AltME] Discussion about AltME
older newer | first last |
Robert 25-May-2009 [3604] | I sometimes have a redraw problem on OSX. Anyone else having the same effect? |
Chris 25-May-2009 [3605] | Yes, specifically when I inadvertantly maximize or minimize the window. |
Henrik 25-May-2009 [3606] | This is always the case for non-cocoa programs, it seems. |
Maxim 25-May-2009 [3607] | probably just a question of having to refresh some object to allow bigger rasters when window resizes. |
Graham 25-May-2009 [3608x2] | If anyone wants to play with IRC in a safe environment, they can connect to my experimental server at www.compkarori.co.nz |
you can use Oldes' Rebol client as listed above | |
Paul 25-May-2009 [3610x2] | Did you get the bot features so that it logs yet? |
ahhh web-public again. | |
Graham 25-May-2009 [3612x2] | not yet ... |
I don't know the commands or whether I need to install some module | |
amacleod 25-May-2009 [3614x2] | Should I take this 50 user limit myth seriously? I was going to use Altme for chat for a large group that could easily have hundreds online at onetime. |
And is it an Altme problem or rebol based...Graham, does Synapse chat have the same limit? | |
Graham 25-May-2009 [3616] | how many users were you thinking of having online concurrently? |
Sunanda 26-May-2009 [3617] | Carl wrote (jan-2005): <AltME is great for private messaging in small (<100) closed groups.> http://www.rebol.com/article/0089.html |
amacleod 26-May-2009 [3618] | It could be well above the 50 limit. Maybe 100-200 |
Maxim 26-May-2009 [3619] | actually, its easy to figure out if rebol really has a 50 connection limit, just open a listener port and call a one line connection rebol script more than 50 times. |
Graham 26-May-2009 [3620x4] | I guess no one has ever got round to stressing it. |
there's about 10 users logged in here at present .. and the lag time is significant | |
but could be just internet routing | |
I never saw more than 15 users online with IOS messenger | |
Maxim 26-May-2009 [3624x2] | I've never traced user count to lag. |
we've been two and it was 10 sec lag, and 15-20 and 1 sec lag. | |
Graham 26-May-2009 [3626x3] | inverse relationship? |
lol | |
anyway, someone should do some testing to see what the limits are for concurrent viable connections for a rebol based chat server | |
Maxim 26-May-2009 [3629] | hum... wouldn't you, like, be the best person to do those tests ;-) |
Graham 26-May-2009 [3630x3] | Lots of people could do it. |
Max ... you got disco'd !!! | |
we found the limit. | |
Maxim 26-May-2009 [3633x2] | hahahaha |
I actually pressed the close button by accident ;-) | |
Graham 26-May-2009 [3635] | awwww.... |
Maxim 26-May-2009 [3636] | but don't you actually have a chat server software against which you can implement a client-side test connection loop? ;-D |
Graham 26-May-2009 [3637x2] | Yes. |
but it uses BEER so it might reach a BEER limitation | |
Maxim 26-May-2009 [3639] | well if we can reach 100 connections to beer.. we definitely will have a party (or a brawl) ;-) |
Graham 26-May-2009 [3640] | well, the source is there .. just modify it to login automatically and start sending serial numbers to see if they are returned. |
sqlab 26-May-2009 [3641] | If I remember right, once I had around 250 or 127 connections at the same time. Don't remember the right number, just that I thought, that's the limit to one port number. |
amacleod 26-May-2009 [3642] | What happens if the limit is exceeded? Does the whole thing fail or does it just refuse the connection to the those beyond limit? |
Maxim 26-May-2009 [3643] | it melts your computer and spams alll the people in your contact list ;-) |
ddharing 26-May-2009 [3644x2] | Some have asked questions in the past about the file size limit in AltMe. It appears to be 6 megs. |
It's disappointingly small. I wonder if there is a technical reason. | |
Brock 26-May-2009 [3646] | I think it was more a practical reason so users of dial-up or slower connections weren't forced to sit through extremely long downloads. I thought this limit was adjustable per AltME server, but I haven't been able to find a setting, so maybe I was wrong. |
ddharing 26-May-2009 [3647x2] | If that is the case then I wonder if there is also a limit to the number of files per world; otherwise, it was not a well thought out limitation because 100, 6-megs files is still a lot of waiting on slow connections. |
A setting would have been nice -- like you said. | |
Brock 26-May-2009 [3649x2] | The nice thing is AltME asks you if you want to download large files or leave on the server, and highlights these icons with different coloured backgrounds. so they are accessible and ready when you want them to be downloaded. |
I've always thought a nice feature would be to set the 'start-date' from where you wanted to receive data from, so you could ease into retrieving either the entire world's contents, or simply start fresh with only the recent submissions. However, your search capability would be limited as the search is performed locally on the data you have available. Maybe the next AltME will have more features like this. | |
ddharing 26-May-2009 [3651x3] | That's a similar feature as the newsgroup readers. Along those same lines, AltMe could just download the file list with comments instead of the files themselves. |
It looks like the next Altme is tied to R3. I don't have a full view of Altme's roadmap which seems more like a poorly marked trail. I've tried to follow it somewhat using sources like this group, Carl's blog and most recently his slides from DevCon 2007. However, I'm not involved in R3, so I suspect I've missed some important sources. | |
The grand plan of R3 seems years away, though. Since Carl now controls the AltMe source code, I wish he would pick a trusted person from the community to keep the R2 AltMe moving forward. I will probably have to drop AltMe as a customer service tool because of issues like this 6 meg limit that shouldn't even be an issue. | |
older newer | first last |