World: r3wp
[!AltME] Discussion about AltME
older newer | first last |
Reichart 14-Nov-2008 [3071] | Sunanada...agreed... |
Pekr 14-Nov-2008 [3072] | I already suggested it directly to Carl in the past, and he agreed. Small note of how to join would be sufficient. One really has to wonder, why such simple thing was not sorted out ... |
Sunanda 14-Nov-2008 [3073] | One other possibility......We could have a "request membership" form on REBOL.org. That'd explain the need to download the client from Altme.com. And it'd send an email to an Admin requesting the person be let in. So all we need is an Admin who is willing to be the recipient of that email. Any takers? |
Pekr 14-Nov-2008 [3074x2] | I might be the one, but I think that it as well should be the person able to set-up account here? |
If noone picks-up, then take my email adress (will not post here - web public group). I then can post requests into Accounts group ... | |
Geomol 14-Nov-2008 [3076] | How is the world lookup working in detail in AltME. I'm asking, because I have a problem at work, where they run behind a firewall, and they use a ip-range from the outside into the firewall. My guess is, that the AltME client ask the World Name server, where a certain world is located, and the server respond with a IP-number. So when a world is created, the world name is stored at the name server together with the IP number. And the IP number is read in the messages sent over the network. So for me to tell the network manager at work, what ports for what IP numbers to open in the firewall, I could call a site like http://www.myip.dk/ with a browser from the server, where the AltME world is created. And this should be the IP number, for which the ports (5400-5409) should be open for incoming trafic. Is this correct? |
Brock 14-Nov-2008 [3077] | AltME feature request. Include the date/time as a second column a group was last updated. Since we don't have the ability to synch what was read between each instance of AltME that we read, having the last date/time listed we could quickly select through the groups we have already visited in a previous session on another machine. Although synching what was last accessed would be the ultimate fix. :-) |
Sunanda 14-Nov-2008 [3078] | Thank's Petr.....I'll PM you some details. |
Gregg 14-Nov-2008 [3079] | I can also take account requests via email, but am also happy to share the wealth and let Petr do that if he wants. :-) |
Reichart 15-Nov-2008 [3080] | Please remember to post your suggestions in AltME feedback, that way it gets logged, thanks. |
Brock 16-Nov-2008 [3081] | Reichart, done. |
Ammon 16-Dec-2008 [3082] | I currently have AltME configured to show 1000 posts and when I go to the !QM group then I see a serious of posts from user "none" it is clear that this user is actually Reichart and all posts he made to that group prior to 21-Apr-07 4:31 PM show up as being posted as "none" Does anyone else see this? |
Graham 16-Dec-2008 [3083] | Remember that R left this world .. and so all his posts became none. He rejoined under the same nick. |
Ammon 16-Dec-2008 [3084] | Ah, right. |
Graham 16-Dec-2008 [3085] | Wonder why he didn't rejoin as Reichart2 .... |
Ammon 16-Dec-2008 [3086] | LOL |
Graham 16-Dec-2008 [3087] | :) |
[unknown: 5] 22-Dec-2008 [3088x3] | A suggestion for handling group termination would be to have an option for a group to be retired and then it goes into like a suspend status where it can't be read but remains listed in a greyed out manner and if someone decides to restore it before the expiration period then it becomes restored. If someone wants to retire it again it goes through the same process. Another thing is to make OPT out groups persistent. |
Correction it CANT be read in a suspend status but remains listed but greyed out. | |
Now another thing would be to make OPT outs persistent so that if someone recreates a group with the same name again later that the person is automatically opted out. | |
Reichart 22-Dec-2008 [3091] | Yup... Qtask has a "Hide project" concept like this. The persistent opt out sounds good, but hard to support well. |
Tomc 23-Dec-2008 [3092] | support inline images , I communicate a bit with some senior citizens who *really* like to send images of everything they are building, if altme could perhaps have inline thumbnails linked to full images stored in the shared folder I could try to move them off email. |
Steeve 24-Dec-2008 [3093] | ... |
Sunanda 28-Dec-2008 [3094] | Was it just me, or did this world and most of REBOL.net have an outage for the last few hours? |
amacleod 28-Dec-2008 [3095] | I found that too. Does rebol.net host altme r3 world? |
Sunanda 28-Dec-2008 [3096] | Thanks. They share an IP address, so I guess that means it does. |
Henrik 28-Dec-2008 [3097] | I saw downtime too. |
Steeve 28-Dec-2008 [3098] | i have problems, Altme is trying to load things but is disconnected before it's finished so that it enter in a enternal loop, trying to reload same things each times. |
Reichart 28-Dec-2008 [3099] | Odd. Worse case, just reinstall. |
Steeve 28-Dec-2008 [3100] | i wonder why disconnections discard all changes. Missing some atomicity in updates here. If the whole loaded things is not commited at once then it's trying to redo again and again. what a mess... |
Reichart 28-Dec-2008 [3101] | Sometimes one person sees something no one else sees. When that happens, we have to start local and work our way out. Given that AltME has not changed, and no one else is seeing this problem, we need to consider that something odd happened on your system, right? |
Steeve 28-Dec-2008 [3102] | it's not the first time people described this syndrom. Saying it never happened before so it doesn't come from Altme, he's a special way to resolve (or not) bugs. |
Reichart 28-Dec-2008 [3103] | First, I did not say it never happened before, I said no one else is seeing this problem. Second, if you are going to argue with my logic, I'll just shut up... |
Gabriele 29-Dec-2008 [3104] | Sunanda: the server was upgraded to 1GB ram. (This was not planned. Richard was unable to connect to it, so he went to restart the server, and decided to take the chance to upgrade the ram. When he got there, he noticed the server was not really down, but he decided to upgrade it anyway.) |
Pekr 29-Dec-2008 [3105] | who needs more than 640KB RAM? - Bill Gates :-) |
Sunanda 29-Dec-2008 [3106] | Thanks for the explanation, Gabriele. |
[unknown: 5] 29-Dec-2008 [3107] | I thought Bill Gates said 64kB of RAM. |
Henrik 29-Dec-2008 [3108] | he didn't say either. it's a mis-quote, or so he says himself. |
[unknown: 5] 29-Dec-2008 [3109] | I was just looking it up and it looks like at the least Pekr was correct that it was a reference to 640KB or RAM whether a misquote or not. ;-) |
Sunanda 1-Jan-2009 [3110x2] | For those who like stats: 110 different people made just over 35,000 posts on this world in 2008. That's nearly five meg of raw text communication. Is that growth or shrinkage? Well, for 2007, we also had 110 active posters, and they made nearly 45,000 posts. So that's shrinkage in volume, and no growth in population. Other worlds (which have specialised in R3 development and testing) have more than taken up the slack in volumes. I don't have numbers for all of them, because I am not a member of them all. |
Small print: I can only count the posts I can see. The totals include the private groups which I am a member, but not those for which I am not. The totals do not count any private messaging between myself and other world members. | |
Claude 14-Jan-2009 [3112] | ask for a account for r3-alpha thanks |
amacleod 19-Jan-2009 [3113x3] | Is it possible to serve more than one world on the same computer? |
I tried and got a "server is already running" message. | |
I got it to work on a different port. On windows you do not seem to need to declare the port like on linux. Windows opens multiple worlds from the gui | |
Brock 19-Jan-2009 [3116x2] | Just beware, if you open the worlds in a different order, they will use the first available port, so for example if the first world you created isn't running, and you start the second world you created, the second world will look for the first port, however, the world server knows it should have been assigned to the second port. (excuse me not using the port numbers to avoid confusion, but I couldn't recall if the first port was 5000, or 5500). If the server isn't using the port is was created on, it won't be recognized by the world server. |
IN short, order matters, and your servers won't open if they don't open with the right port being available. | |
amacleod 20-Jan-2009 [3118x2] | I going to be serving on a linux box and it seems you can just assign the port at start up. altme -s "world name" -p 5401 |
Now trying to autostart at boot time but having a trouble... su -lc '/.../altserve -s world -p port &' user > /dev/null according ot altme guide does not seem to launching... I know the example is for altmeserve but I thought it would work for client as well | |
Brock 20-Jan-2009 [3120] | sorry, my issue was with re-creating a world. I had multiple worlds hosted on the same machine at one time and I cheaped out and didn't register the world for $10 US per world. When the worlds expired after 10 days of no usage (which never happened, but they expried anyway), I had to recreate the worlds, the order was important in that scenario. Sorry for misleading you. |
older newer | first last |