World: r3wp

same here.

I think that Cyphre or someone else could be contracted, to improve 
feeling to AltME in a big way - e.g. list-box with available worlds 
is simply awful - typical VID bug - you can't escape it by pressing 
escape, you can't escape it by clicking outside, you can't escape 
it in any way ... that just makes so bad impression here ....

Other thing - after all those years, list style could be updated, 
to allow keyboard scrolling, or even shortcut search of groups ....

I think that small things could make a real difference ... and I 
vote for some button to de-red groups at once :-)

Upgrade here went just fine though I agree with Graham heartily that 
we need they "Kill Red" button badly. I wonder what would happen 
if I read all the files and rewrote them?

is there a list of changes somewhere?

I kind of miss a list of changes in a window, when asking whether 
you want to upgrade

Ahh...just noticed that Altme upgrade wiped my saved userid and passwords 
:(

Upgrade to 1.2.6 seems to have gone fine for me.

I had no problems in upgrading. No lost passwords or anything.

+1 on everything Pekr just said, actually I'd give it at least a 
+10 ;-)

I just got an "Internet Busy..." and was disconnected. Is that new?

same here but I'm using a wireless card in my laptop at a truck stop 
and it show 1.2.8 here

there was indeed another update

one can wonder what the changes are :-)

http://altme.com/new.html<--- oh :-)

I do like to see the movement on altme development

Update to 1.2.8 went well.

playing around with file sharing here... is it wise to just allow 
to run DOS batch files without permission? when I upload a .bat file 
and click on it from another host, it immediately runs.

Runs on which machine ?

Not a good idea IMO. I guess its altme-filesharing and they use 'run 
for launch? aybe they should launch through the browser isntead, 
would that protect?

anton: standard XP box runs it immediately

with all the latest updates...

I meant, does it run on the machine from which you clicked, or does 
it run on the server where the .bat file lives. (after thought I 
suppose it runs on the machine from which you clicked.)

anton:


1. on Machine A, an XP box, I create a bat file and add it to my 
file sharing list on my world

2. on Machine B, also an XP box, I open AltME on that same world 
with the same user account and notice that a new file is ready for 
download.
3. on Machine B, I click it and it downloads.

4. on Machine B, I click it again, and it immediately opens a DOS 
shell window and runs.

A bit of a security hole.

but that 's it like telling, then someone sends me format.exe in 
email, I save it, and once I click it, it formats my HD :-) Or am 
I missing something? How is that supposed to be a security hole?

pekr, maybe I'm just too used to OSX, but OSX will ask for security 
permission before I run anything at that level.

there isn't even a requester saying "do you really want to run this 
app? could be dangerous. your computer could go boom." like webbrowsers 
do nowadays.

maybe I just don't understand the issue - what level do you mean? 
You downloaded .bat file, which is just that, .bat file. It now depends, 
what you can do under your XP box (user permissions)

well, so basically you are expecting altme to distinguish particular 
suffixes as .bat, .pif, .exe .cmd and prevent their direct execution?

yes, something like that. I think it's pretty standard policy to 
do that. What's this notorious single-click policy to run things 
in Rebol anyway? The viewtop does it too. :-)

you can run it by single click in altme? That is not probably good 
:-)

yes, that's what I'm complaining about :-)

then I do understand your concern :-)

Well with rebol at least you have some security. But I always preferred 
double-click to run an application.

Oh I see what you mean - single-click from AltME executes the .bat 
file.

I think it's part of Reichart's new philosophy to simplify everything 
to the lowest common denominator, which I'm not entirely sold on.

me neither

i guess he simply uses an os-call to launch the right app. Where 
the app is choosen by the os, based on filetype. And a *.bat runs..

I think Carl wrote this stuff ...

I would log it as a bug

I've just installed ubuntu on my desktop (15" LCD screen). The first 
application I've installed is AltME.

The text size in minute even with the large font selected. Any hints?

in -> is

is it a font issue?

I remember RT has document it somewhere that there are some libraries 
required to run REBOL/View on Linux

I don't know - the rest of the dekstop is fine - does Rebol require 
special fonts.

.. dekstop -> desktop

http://www.rebol.net/builds/lib-dep.html

how about the above link?

I saw 'freetype' as a requirement