World: r3wp
[!AltME] Discussion about AltME
older newer | first last |
Henrik 14-May-2006 [1512] | well, then perhaps allow color configuration in AltME? |
ScottT 14-May-2006 [1513x2] | I can stop posting in colors, actually. I don't want to irritate anyone any further. now that I've expressed my wishes for altme to not neutron-bomb my eyeballs, I'll swiitch it off. |
nobody liked my last color scheme, either. . . This one is closer to my windows default, though. The last one was like old-school amber, and that is similar to my Textpad colors. | |
Graham 14-May-2006 [1515] | Hang on, was all these obscene colour schemes of yours some type of protest that all of us, who had no control over, were being subjected to? |
ScottT 14-May-2006 [1516] | ooooh. topic is nice. |
Sunanda 14-May-2006 [1517] | There's a formula for chosing a readable forground/background color pair here: http://aprompt.snow.utoronto.ca/WebPageColors.html That's one way to reduce some of the apparent subjectiivity |
ScottT 14-May-2006 [1518] | how's this? |
Graham 14-May-2006 [1519] | I think we should kill all colour options. |
Gabriele 14-May-2006 [1520] | scott: the reason is that with a black bg your eye will let more light in, because on average it's darker, and the white pixels will "burn" the retina. with more illumination the eye adjusts so that you don't get too much light in. |
ScottT 14-May-2006 [1521] | wouldn't break my heart, if AltMe used my system defaults. |
Gabriele 14-May-2006 [1522x2] | sure, i agree it would be better to have user defaults. |
i'm just saying that light bg is usually the default for a reason, not because we're all crazy ;) | |
ScottT 14-May-2006 [1524] | quote from that article: Several other important findings also resulted from the analysis including the fact that light-on-dark color combinations were rated the same as dark-on-light color combinations and the fact that as the overall brightness of the text/background combination increased, so did the overall user rating. |
Graham 14-May-2006 [1525] | It's so we don't waste ink when we print! |
ScottT 14-May-2006 [1526x2] | but all my software seems smart enough to know what I want. I can specify all text as black in IE. |
that's weird. why is all the white now pink? maybe I just don't know what i'm doing, or I need to RTM | |
Sunanda 14-May-2006 [1528] | It's a general issue about usability. Web browers are much more flexible -- they have to be: they have more users. Soem accessibility options (like chosing fonts and sizes) need to be built into View rather than each application.....Then making fluid GUI applications will be easy. |
james_nak 17-May-2006 [1529] | Is there a "hot-key" to turn on/off the multiple-line (CR-mode) in Altme? I know it's just a mouse-click away but... |
Brock 17-May-2006 [1530x2] | The pencil icon |
ah, but you're looking for a hotkey... sorry, not that I am aware of. | |
Chris 17-May-2006 [1532] | Ctrl-E |
[unknown: 9] 17-May-2006 [1533x3] | For the future, just type "AltME shortcuts" into google. |
Then bitch at us for not updating it : ) | |
Which you can do here: http://www.altme.com/feedback.html | |
Pekr 17-May-2006 [1536x2] | ha, nice website! |
such face-lift would not hurt for RT's site :-) | |
james_nak 18-May-2006 [1538] | Ah, you guys are on it! Thanks all. No complaining here, Reichart. |
[unknown: 9] 19-May-2006 [1539] | : ) |
Louis 23-May-2006 [1540] | I've been getting lots of these errors lately for some reason ( Never had this problem before): Invalid data type during recycle ** Press enter to quit... |
[unknown: 9] 23-May-2006 [1541] | That is what we call the "rebol" bug. |
Louis 23-May-2006 [1542] | I'm wondering if it might be cause by not enough ram? I've installed too many programs that leave drivers running in memory. |
[unknown: 9] 23-May-2006 [1543] | We see it randomly so far. |
Louis 25-May-2006 [1544x2] | I think it was caused by my setting message limit to 10000 per chat room so I could do some searching. |
I changed it back to 100 per chat room, and now the problem is gone. | |
[unknown: 9] 25-May-2006 [1546x2] | Cool! That is actually pretty solid info then. WE are going to simply cap to 100 except for single operations. In other words, you can search the past, but then return to 100. |
Thoughts? | |
Louis 25-May-2006 [1548] | Good idea. It happened because I forgot to change back after searching. ...didn't realize it for awhile. |
Geomol 25-May-2006 [1549] | Thoughts, yes. I'm not sure, if you read all history into mem!? If you set cap to 100, it may be a good idea to only load 100 posts into mem for each group. Searching should then be smart and search on disk, only loading those posts in, that's needed. |
Louis 25-May-2006 [1550] | Yes, it would be much better if a search could be done without the user having to change any settings. Otherwise most users will probably not do any searching at all. |
Tomc 25-May-2006 [1551] | I would also want a browse mode where i could broese all history --- and that 100 is pretty small 500 or 1000 should work. (and if they dont there is something else learned about the bug) but I am sure I have never run with less than 1000 lines of buffer and only rarely had the recycle bug and then most likely because of searching prompted me to increase my buffer and I would only decrease it if things got too sluggish |
Louis 25-May-2006 [1552] | My computer is really low on RAM, which might have something to do with this. |
BrianH 25-May-2006 [1553] | I have a lot of RAM, and I tend to leave the history at 500. Please allow the cap to be specified, and then have the whole of history available for search. |
Volker 26-May-2006 [1554] | How about loading stuff with a load/next loop? its a block of blocks, so that would work. and the loaded portions would be smaller. |
james_nak 26-May-2006 [1555] | I think it's related the RAM (or the lack thereof) as well. I normally see that when I've hit my limit and venture in virtual memory. |
Volker 26-May-2006 [1556] | I think its related to timing. A big operation takes to long. Using vmem takes even longer. |
Gabriele 27-May-2006 [1557] | on the detective the GC used to crash a lot when invoked while inside an awake function. i worked around it by deferring actions. i guess this is the same bug or very similar, and it should be fixed in view 1.3, so a new build of altme should fix it. |
Anton 27-May-2006 [1558] | Ok, so a large amount of data processing, the creation of a large block perhaps, or lots of small ones, could cause the GC to kick in to free some older data. |
james_nak 30-May-2006 [1559] | It may also have something to do with the after-effects of a full virus scan. |
Carl 1-Jun-2006 [1560x2] | New AltME release (must download, will not auto update to this): www.altme.com/download/altme-b1203.exe www.altme.com/download/altme-osx-b1203.tar.gz |
If you have bugs or minor enhancements (no majors accepted right now), be sure to report them using AltME feedback. We do not scan this chat group (sorry, not enough time!) | |
older newer | first last |