World: r3wp
[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group
older newer | first last |
Pekr 10-Mar-2005 [305x4] | In CZ, we have NIC - central registrant, which does not accept any registrations and is only coordinator and State has its xy % of value there. We have to choose between various certified registrant companies. I did choose globe.cz and they are fine. They do care, they pay to NIC.cz and then they request money from me. Before the domain expires, I am notified, if I have nothing agains payment of next period and if there is any info I want to change ... |
I have also unified portal, where I can see all my domains (actually something as 7 or 8), I can change MX, DNS entries, FTP, hostings, etc. etc. | |
huh, did not try rebol.com untill now, that is really a bad for RT to forget to renew domain ;-) | |
shouldn't anyone in US give RT a call to notify them? | |
Ammon 10-Mar-2005 [309] | Bo already did |
Pekr 10-Mar-2005 [310] | Well, at least some refreshing new look after so long time :-)) |
Graham 10-Mar-2005 [311x2] | I had to wait a week or more with my domain lapsed before networksolutions gave it up and allowed me to register it again with new registrar |
they seemed somewhat reluctant to respond to my request to transfer to registrar while it was active | |
Allen 10-Mar-2005 [313] | If you saw the original whois entry. it actually said it was expiring in 2006. |
Graham 10-Mar-2005 [314] | perhaps someone was messing with their internal clocks at Network Solutions ? |
Sunanda 11-Mar-2005 [315] | REBOL.com back up. Explanation here: http://www.rebol.net/article/0136.html |
Cyphre 15-Mar-2005 [316] | Steve, here you can download my contribution to the Spreadsheet Contest: http://www.rebol.cz/~cyphre/cyphres.sht (hope I win :-)) |
eFishAnt 16-Mar-2005 [317x4] | Help, Help, its a runaway spreadsheet! |
VERY COOL, Cyphre. That is way-out-of-the-box. | |
better than any Amiga screen hacks that I can remember... | |
however, functionality is an important critieria in the contest...so everyone knows the competition is still open...I have seen a calendar, some web stats, etc that have been done thus far... | |
Allen 16-Mar-2005 [321] | Nice Cyphre. Imaging what it could do with AGG. The first vector graphic spreadsheets |
eFishAnt 16-Mar-2005 [322] | blocks of data ? ;-) |
Maxim 17-Mar-2005 [323x2] | eFishAnt, where is this spreadsheet contest described? |
my scrollable 300000 cell table face might be easy to adapt... ;-) | |
Graham 17-Mar-2005 [325x3] | Brian, trim works in-situ |
battery-file: to-file join battery-dir [ battery "state" ] seems incorrect | |
copy value to end (trim value) I always have problems with these types of statements in real world data, cause if 'value becomes none, then 'trim will throw a wobbly | |
Anton 17-Mar-2005 [328x2] | all [value trim value] |
Oh I see what you're talking about. Yes, nice article, Brian. :) That must be very helpful documentation for beginners. | |
BrianW 17-Mar-2005 [330x2] | Thanks. From a beginner, for beginners :-) |
Graham - What is a better way to create the battery-file filename? | |
eFishAnt 17-Mar-2005 [332] | Maxim: Spreadsheet and/or Announce....just make a spreadsheet for nano-sheets.r from article, and winner gets $50 prize. |
Graham 17-Mar-2005 [333] | Brian, my first take on this was that [ battery ... ] would not be evaluated , but I see it is. |
BrianW 17-Mar-2005 [334] | I think if I were to rewrite I would use 'rejoin instead. Still, it's sort of a marker of my knowledge right now. I want to let it simmer for a bit before I go in and start trouching it up. |
Graham 17-Mar-2005 [335] | well, if you did this battery-file: join battery-dir join battery "state" you wouldn't need the 'to-file |
BrianW 17-Mar-2005 [336] | Actually, I don't think I need 'to-file in the first place. |
Graham 17-Mar-2005 [337] | also, likewise with rejoin [ battery-dir battery "state" ] |
BrianW 17-Mar-2005 [338x2] | Okay, i went ahead and changed "to-file join ..." to "rejoin [ ..." Also threw in a little check for zero bit in calculating remaining time. |
It'll go up in the next upload of the site. | |
Graham 20-Mar-2005 [340] | I think sound is now free in the free versions. |
BrianW 20-Mar-2005 [341] | sound and call both are, aren't they? I'm not sure, so I just wanted to start with what I knew from rebol.com and the reboltalk forum |
Graham 20-Mar-2005 [342x2] | not sure about 'call ... |
RT should certainly get around to mentioning that these run on Windows XP, and not just 2000 | |
Vincent 20-Mar-2005 [344] | 'call is available from View 1.2.11, but I don't know if it's not just for beta-testing, and if it will be free in next official version |
Graham 20-Mar-2005 [345x4] | and if you want 'call from core, you need r/command. |
this page should give you that overview : http://www.rebol.com/purchase.html | |
I wonder if that upgrade price from View/Pro to SDK is correct. The price for View/Pro used to be $49, and perhaps they didn't reduce the upgrade price when they increased the price to $99... | |
odd pricing ... View/Pro ( $99) + upgrade to SDK ($199) = $298 + upgrade to command/sdk ($199) = $497 but start from Command ($349) + upgrade to command/sdk ($199) = $548 Looks like you're penalised if you start from R/Command. | |
BrianW 20-Mar-2005 [349] | Graham, the overview was mainly so I had a single page linking to documentation :-) |
Graham 20-Mar-2005 [350] | http://www.rebol.com/purchase.htmlgives you links to datasheets on each product |
BrianW 20-Mar-2005 [351x2] | I meant links to the docs (Library docs, Sound docs, call docs, encryption docs) |
oy. Or I could have just scrolled down the page on http://www.rebol.com/docs-view.html I am very silly sometimes. | |
Graham 27-Mar-2005 [353] | Volker, is that spell check different from the one on developer ? |
Volker 27-Mar-2005 [354] | No, only more public. |
older newer | first last |