World: r3wp
[Tech News] Interesting technology
older newer | first last |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [5468x3] | why don't they just tax everyone and you can get a tax rebate if you can prove you're deaf and blind ? |
face it, you're only got one pair of those sense organs, and it doesn't seem to be fair to be taxed twice if you own two mp3 players | |
Or, the french govt could use profiling ... and tax those who fit the profile | |
Steeve 29-Dec-2010 [5471] | The tax is related to the size of the memory storage. Every device with memory could be taxed, it's the idea. |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [5472] | time for another revolution ... storm the bastille |
Steeve 29-Dec-2010 [5473] | Like Brian said, the tax principle is not the real problem. The problem is that the final cost becomes way too large for some devices. Tax added on already existing taxes. |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [5474x4] | remove copyright on music .. and get musicians to get a grant from general taxation |
make them servants of the state :) | |
It's simply crazy to tax devices | |
In the past, everyone here had to pay for a TV license ... and we had these vans patrolling the streets trying to pick up unlicensed TV sets | |
Steeve 29-Dec-2010 [5478] | We still have it here |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [5479x2] | Now the broadcasters get their fees from advertizing |
What?? still pay tv license fees? | |
Steeve 29-Dec-2010 [5481] | yeah and those who can receive TV via internet pay it as well |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [5482x3] | No Freeview digital broadcasts ? |
What about satellites? | |
Well, you must live in a very repressive state!! | |
Steeve 29-Dec-2010 [5485] | We have public and private networks, We pay tax because of the public ones. |
Henrik 29-Dec-2010 [5486] | We have that here too and the fee is climbing every year and is the same amount for students and billionaires. The rule is that as soon as you have a device that can receive radio or TV signals (doesn't matter if you can actually watch TV or hear radio), you have to pay. Also our internet connections are taxed this way. If you have more than a 256 kbit connection, you have to pay. |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [5487x5] | OMG |
How pitiful | |
out public networks were privatised | |
out = our | |
not a function of govt to run tv stations | |
Henrik 29-Dec-2010 [5492] | I'd rather that we had to pay this as an actual tax, so no money would be spent on controlling whether we had a TV, but it's done as a separate fee that you can elect not to pay, once you prove that you don't have a TV, radio, internet connection or access to any of that from your home. |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [5493] | so cellphones are taxed for tv, radio and internet? |
Henrik 29-Dec-2010 [5494] | it's not a tax for internet access, but a tax for the ability to access webstreams of national TV. |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [5495] | I suspect your countries have large bureaucracies |
Henrik 29-Dec-2010 [5496x2] | anyone are taxed, even businesses and also if you run an internet connection to a bikeshed for a webcam. |
Denmark has the world's largest bureaucracy with close to, around 30-40% of the working population being publicly employed (don't know the exact figure). | |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [5498] | Why are your cartoonists drawing pictures of Mohammed when there's a lot more wrong with your own country!! |
Steeve 29-Dec-2010 [5499] | Honestly I prefer to live in countries like Denmark or France instead of USA or England. You feel the difference when you lost your employment or have a big decease. |
Henrik 29-Dec-2010 [5500] | Mohammed drawings is really a small problem. There are some things we like very much, like having free hospitals. What we don't like so much is that the public sector is growing in the wrong way. It's adding personnel for doing controls, paperwork, managing silly rules and making sure people uphold stupid laws, rather than increasing productivity. If it did, it would be OK. It's really about what we get for our tax money, and it's not enough. Our government is trying to control us into the ground. |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [5501x2] | if 50% of the country works for the govt, of course it makes sense to increase that as it increases your vote |
what political party would be elected on a platform to reduce the size of govt when everyone works for the govt? | |
Henrik 29-Dec-2010 [5503] | We have lost big companies, like Vestas, which was once our pride leading windmill manufacturer. Now production facilities are closing down, because taxes are so high and wages are skyrocketing to pay those taxes. Last year, the interest in investing in factories in Denmark reached a history low. Yet taxes are still increasing. |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [5504] | where did Vestas move to? |
Steeve 29-Dec-2010 [5505] | When I see the really bad situation of employment in USA currently (and all that people who lost their house). I don't think we are in such a bad way. |
Henrik 29-Dec-2010 [5506] | Graham, UK, I believe. Perhaps also China. |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [5507] | but Steeve, even if you lose your job you can still watch TV and listen to music! |
Henrik 29-Dec-2010 [5508] | Steeve, yeah, but the situation in the USA is also because of a fragile economic base. |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [5509x3] | I guess if you're part of the EEC, you can just move to a different country to live? |
I hear Iceland is bankrupt .. | |
What's Sweden like? | |
Henrik 29-Dec-2010 [5512x2] | Sure you can, and many are leaving. Particularly the highly educated part of the public. Our government has also put a nice system in place that prevents highly educated people from settling in the country. |
Sweden, cheaper cars and DVDs, more blondes, but otherwise probably the same. | |
Steeve 29-Dec-2010 [5514] | We don't have the whole scene though, in our community, because the Rebolers have enough intellectual forces to make their way in the world :-) But the world economic situation is really bad. |
Henrik 29-Dec-2010 [5515] | Oh, by the way, when you buy a new car here, you get to pay 180% of its value in taxes. |
GrahamC 29-Dec-2010 [5516x2] | Is Nokia keeping Finland afloat ? |
High taxation, large govt bureacracies .. sounds like very socialist economies | |
older newer | first last |