r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Tech News] Interesting technology

Maxim
10-Jul-2009
[4173]
it seems a cousin to the glass project, of which glob is already 
very effective, and is a node-based lazy engine for rebol, using 
AGG exclusively.
Pekr
10-Jul-2009
[4174]
glob? Somethin new? Well, when we will see Glass runnable? I mean 
- some cute demo?
Maxim
10-Jul-2009
[4175x2]
glob has been showcased 3 years ago in a graphics demo... Its also 
the basis for liquid-paint.r
GLASS will wait for R3, and plugins.   its a decision I took last 
year.  GLASS is also a completely new GUI concept.. its totally different 
in the way you relate to a gui.  


There are still a few technological aspects to the concept that I 
wasn't able to resolve in the architecture itself.  This engine should 
allow non Graphical interface to be applied to any application.

like a Voice driven interface to forms, for example.  but the application 
isn't even aware of this... this is part of the skin itself.
Pekr
10-Jul-2009
[4177]
Silverlight 3 available, now with ability to create external/offline 
applications, accelerated GFX and more - http://timheuer.com/blog/archive/2009/03/18/silverlight-3-whats-new-a-guide.aspx
Graham
11-Jul-2009
[4178]
Submitted my Amazon competition entry ... maybe I can win another 
$25 of credits again though I haven't used up the last $25 i got 
from them 2 years ago!
Graham
12-Jul-2009
[4179x4]
Fresco uses Corba, and there isn't a ReBOL implementation ... well, 
there wasn't when someone last asked on the list in 1999.
The IDL interface definition is independent of programming language, 
but maps to all of the popular programming languages via OMG standards: 
OMG has standardized mappings from IDL to C, C++, Java, COBOL, Smalltalk, 
Ada, Lisp, Python, and IDLscript.
Having a Rebol implementation of IIOP seems as though it would be 
very useful.
Using up to 1,000 high CPU large Amazon instances for space exploration 
http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2009/06/scaling-to-the-stars.html
Graham
18-Jul-2009
[4183x2]
In one of the groups btiffin asked me about net filtering in NZ. 
 It seems it is going to be used by most, if not all the ISPs, and 
is designed to block child porn.
ordinary porn is fine ....
Sunanda
3-Aug-2009
[4185]
Carl Sassenrath: 13th most influential person in programming!?

http://www.webdesigndev.com/programming/30-most-influential-people-in-programming
Kaj
3-Aug-2009
[4186]
Fair
Oldes
3-Aug-2009
[4187]
Matt Mullenweg with Wordpress is second? It's not too fair.. what 
it has to do with programming?
Izkata
3-Aug-2009
[4188]
Yeah, I thought putting that one so high was rather strange as well...
Henrik
3-Aug-2009
[4189]
The whole list is quite odd. In fact, I find it very odd that Carl 
is there.
Oldes
3-Aug-2009
[4190x2]
Matt is probably here because the site is powered by Wordpress:)
It would be less odd if the list would be in alphabetical order. 
Else it's strange, that creator of PHP is after someone who just 
did application in PHP. But anyway.. it's nice that there are some 
people who recognize Carl.
Kaj
4-Aug-2009
[4192]
It's their personal preferences
Pekr
5-Aug-2009
[4193x2]
Google to buy On2 - it should theoretically resolve the situation 
around HTML5 video codec


 http://www.osnews.com/story/21950/Google_To_Buy_Video_Compression_Technology_Outfit_On2
KDE 4.3 released - video available - http://kde.org/announcements/4.3/index.php
Henrik
6-Aug-2009
[4195]
I noticed from the discussion on OSNews that most people are concerned 
with wildly different performance of KDE4 on different hardware:


If you are using Nvidia and driver version 1008 with Kernel 2.6.29 
with Xorg 7.2.1.3 then you might get good 3D effects with KDE 4.2.99.5. 
But that combination gives really dicey 2D

What kind of desktop "experience" is that?
Kaj
7-Aug-2009
[4196]
Linux is for adventurers, not for consumers
Henrik
12-Aug-2009
[4197]
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10805_3-10308013-75.html

Seem patent trolling is getting really lucrative.
amacleod
12-Aug-2009
[4198]
Confused as to what they infringed upon...I thought XML was open 
standard...
Reichart
12-Aug-2009
[4199]
I think I can help here (I'm about to have another patent awarded 
in fact that touches on this same area).


First, we all have to laugh here that what the patent covers is that 
data is sent in a format that is OPEN and STANDARD.  XML falls under 
this definition.


From the description “Any program or procedure which needs to format 
or understand the document must know all of the special codes and 
be able to correctly separate them from the content. All routines 
which work with the document must have exactly the same model of 
how the embedded codes are formatted or placed. If any operation 
misinterprets the code sequence even slightly, or mistakes content 
for formatting, the document or a part thereof will be reduced to 
meaninglessness. “


In other words guys, this group is suing Microsilly for FINALLY playing 
nice with everyone else.   This is the purist form of irony ever, 
and I love it.


I agree with the judge.   The problem now is...is there prior art? 
 This is 1994.  Permit me to make something clear, they are not claiming 
that showing something like XML is the scope of the patent, even 
WordPerfect would should you something like XML if you asked to “reveal 
codes”, but in fact it was stored internally in some odd format (just 
like word).  The move to storing the data in this standardized way, 
and showing it in the same way, might indeed by unqiue.  The language 
for storing it has to be standard itself, this self referencing part 
is what makes this tricky.
Anton
13-Aug-2009
[4200]
My understanding of it is they had some black beads and some red 
beads mixed in a pile. The "invention" was to separate the red beads 
and the black beads.
Graham
13-Aug-2009
[4201x2]
so, is this like combining an XSD with an XML document ?
separately they're okay?
Gabriele
13-Aug-2009
[4203]
I wish MS would become against software patents just because of this... 
and then we finally get rid of them. ;) (or, make them work correctly 
- patent lasts 5 years, MUST include working source code, and when 
patent expires that source code becomes "free")
Anton
13-Aug-2009
[4204]
I suspect this case might have been set up by Microsoft, to justify 
changing format of their docs. Surely if MS wanted to win this one 
they could have.
Pekr
13-Aug-2009
[4205]
... a conspiracy theory? :-)
Anton
13-Aug-2009
[4206]
A conspiracy theory.
Will
17-Aug-2009
[4207]
Catch it 8) , twitter's rebol news http://toriseye.quodis.com/#rebol
Graham
2-Sep-2009
[4208x2]
http://www.yikebike.com/

expensive bikes !
can a bike be called "revolutionary" ??
Will
2-Sep-2009
[4210]
Lovely! 8))
Henrik
2-Sep-2009
[4211]
yeah. what happens if you have to brake hard?
Graham
2-Sep-2009
[4212]
See the FAQ
Sunanda
2-Sep-2009
[4213]
Intertesting idea -- hope it succeeds, and the price drops by an 
order of magnitude!

Max speed is stated as 20KPH -- not a very high speed for a bicycle. 
So hard braking unlikely to be a problem.

Needing to use a backpack (no attachable panniers) will be a drawback 
for commuters / shoppers.
Izkata
2-Sep-2009
[4214]
Interesting looking, but their FAQ is a bit off in at least one place: 
 20 KPH (about 12 MPH) might be slow, but it is fast enough for wind 
resistance to become an issue because your entire torso is spread 
sitting up, making it catch much more air.  Also, since sitting up 
gives you a higher center of gravity than leaning forward as on a 
normal bike, it seems less stable to me...


Then again, I rollerblade rather than bike, so I don't know much 
about the Center of Gravity on bikes, but my wind resistance comment 
comes from leaning forward at around 15 MPH and still having issues 
with the wind throwing my balance.
Graham
2-Sep-2009
[4215x2]
Nothing to stop you from curling up .... but this mode of transport 
seems designed for urban use.
BTW, I think "yike" is short for "Yikes!!" which is what you say 
when you see the price :)
Reichart
2-Sep-2009
[4217]
..............uh.............. so who exactly is this bike for...

Have any of you been OUTISDE and looked around?

http://www.thegiantnapkin.com/images/fatpeople walking.jpg
Graham
2-Sep-2009
[4218x2]
It's priced in Euros ... let me see ... where do they use Euros ?
Looks like they'll also be sellng in NZ too.  I wonder if my dog 
would mind if I used a NZ$7000 bike to '"walk" him ...
Henrik
3-Sep-2009
[4220]
so it's the beginning of how people end up in Wall-E.
Chris
3-Sep-2009
[4221]
I guess on the one hand, it's a replacement for scooters - they look 
nimble and the fold-up feature is convenient (no parking!). As a 
cyclist, I appreciate the exercise, but sometimes miss the convenience 
of being lazy - I'd give it a try as a backup, but I think in the 
'States a scooter offers more range, versatility and presence...
Pekr
4-Sep-2009
[4222]
This device will be never successful, and is even dangerous. Normally, 
when you drive, you have your hands in front of you, not behind of 
you. When there will be any road-block in front of you, you will 
reflectively put your hands in front of you, to cover your head, 
body, whatever. This is really only a jewelery, not a real bike ....