World: r3wp
[PowerPack] discussions about RP
older newer | first last |
Robert 28-May-2005 [102x3] | One major point wasn't said: We need a library system to handle all this. I won't use code, where I need to 'do zillions of single files in a specific order, handle path and lookup things, need local sub-directories to load images etc. I'm still using Slim on my xpeers system, because that's the only thing I know about that handles all this quite well. And I can tell you, it pays off. Something like this is required. |
And libraries must be compatible. The current running RebGUI projects is a good example. Feedback loop is fast, releases are done often (thanks to Ashley) and momentum is raising. | |
As already said, I see some parallels to the RPC idea. And as Ashley said, quality matters, and the ultimate test is to see if the stuff is used. So, just throwing together some cool stuff and hoping that's it isn't enough. I really would like to see this effort merged into the RPC idea. This would avoid this licensing discussion too. | |
shadwolf 28-May-2005 [105x4] | hum having all in one file until it's not a stable release complicates a lot the search and find for bugs ... |
you don't handle one file with more than 2 thousand lines than several files with at max 200 hundred lines ;) | |
2 hundred ,à | |
if people now the code scruture it's easy for them to work with a sigle hudge file if people don't know the file scruture it's hard for them to locate the place where they have to act (adding code, fixing bugs) | |
Gregg 28-May-2005 [109] | I agree shadwolf. The need for a library system points to the more general need of how to structure larger REBOL projects. |
BrianW 28-May-2005 [110] | There's the preprocessor setup in Rebol/SDK. |
Ammon 28-May-2005 [111] | Yeah, but we need more than that |
BrianW 28-May-2005 [112] | I agree, absolutely. I'd like to see something like perl-style runtime 'require/import/use' semantics, even if it's just in a wrapped-rebol app. |
Maarten 28-May-2005 [113x4] | Some remarks: wrt licensing, RP components will be BSD based. RP should help you jump-start and it only does that if you can use it in all circumstances. No need for discussion about that (how nice to be a benevolent dictator ;-) |
Wrt library system: in time there might be a library system in RP, but any componet will be self-contained. Otherwise you end up being forced to use a bloated library whenall you need is just a small subset of functions. | |
The way it looks now is that the Viewtop in 1.3 will have a place that can be used by RP. This solves a lot of problems in terms of version managemet and accessibility. | |
Meanwhile.... send me your code that is BSD licensed and well documented! | |
Guest 30-May-2005 [117] | is there anything close to ruby rails wrt automatically defing MySQL CRUD operations ? I find rails really cool, something Rebol could easily do !! |
DideC 28-Jun-2005 [118x2] | Olivier Auverlot proposes to add its Magic! script to the Powerpack. Magic! is a CGI handler that dramaticaly simplify the creation of dynamic web site "à la" PHP. Version 3.5 is in the pipeline and will be release soon. But doc is in French AFAIK, so need to be translate before. |
before=first :\ | |
Maarten 28-Jun-2005 [120] | OK, who will translate.... Right now I am leaning towards including RSP by Laurent Chevalier. |
DideC 28-Jun-2005 [121] | Translation: we will do. There is also RUn (Rebol Unit) from Christophe Coussement (RebolTof). Java Unit, Rebol made. |
shadwolf 28-Jun-2005 [122] | Magic doc is yet translated and available on Gram Chiu Comkarori |
Maarten 28-Jun-2005 [123] | So the question is: RSP or Magic! |
yeksoon 28-Jun-2005 [124] | +1 for Magic! |
DideC 28-Jun-2005 [125] | I just know RSP by its name. If you know it, just compare to Magic! http://www.compkarori.com/vanilla/display/Magic! |
Maarten 28-Jun-2005 [126x2] | Just did. Magic has a nice set of HTML functions but the drawback is that you need a daemon for session management, which won't work in a shared hosting env and is harder to keep alive. But is seems a bit more complete, so provided that you'll do the 3.5 translation as well I'd be happy to include it. |
I need graphics support for the REBOL Powerpack reb site! If you have a backdrop, image, folder icon, .... please send them to me. See contact details here for the mail address. | |
DideC 28-Jun-2005 [128] | The session deamon is not necessary at all AFAIK. 3.5 is not released yet, so the doc. But French community will translate ASAP as it does last time, I hope. |
yeksoon 21-Dec-2005 [129x3] | . |
is there a site for PowerPack..where I can have a look at what it encompasses? | |
I change the name to 'PowerPack' instead of 'Rebol powerpack' .. it makes it easier to see the name of this group ... hope no one objects | |
Graham 8-Feb-2006 [132x2] | What's happening with the PowerPack? |
I'm looking for a bunch of "certified" software that can be used for setting up webservers, cgi, blogs, mail, pop etc. | |
Thør 4-Apr-2006 [134] | . |
yeksoon 24-May-2006 [135] | pinging for update. if work has stopped for Powerpack, I would be glad to pick up part of the job here. |
Maarten 24-May-2006 [136] | You just became one-man project-lead/implementer ;-) I never got to it. |
Gregg 24-May-2006 [137] | But a lot of us like the idea. Maybe we can sneak some info out of the R3 team about how best to go about it, WRT modules and such. |
Terry 24-May-2006 [138] | not sure if this was mentioned earlier, but someone said that Uniserve is GPL.. it's not.. it's BSD |
yeksoon 25-May-2006 [139] | I will look into getting the Powerpack going. I will need to spend some time reading through the archives to ensure that the original objective remains clear. That should help serve as the guidelines for making decisions down the road. |
Claude 8-Sep-2006 [140] | . |
Gregg 20-Apr-2007 [141] | Is anyone in this group still interested in a more serious REBOL repository? May be adjunct to REBOL.org, or something else, but targeted at a more consistent model for libraries and modules, so things are easier to INCLUDE and reuse. |
Henrik 20-Apr-2007 [142x2] | yes |
I haven't followed the group too closely, but are the rules and the model for libraries and modules made? | |
Maxim 20-Apr-2007 [144] | we are converging all prior efforts and their originators into a single concerted effort. |
Gregg 20-Apr-2007 [145] | There's a new private chat group. I'll add you to it. |
Anton 21-Apr-2007 [146] | I'm interested, but I am afraid that I will disagree with other people who have different ideas about what is the best way to implement a library/module system - therefore I am cautious before spending too much time here. |
Mario 10-May-2007 [147x2] | I am working on a "starterpack" when I find some time. It simply downloads the scripts I found useful or very interesting but they are not really managed/organised but for I put them in different directories depending on their main purpose |
If someone is interested please let me know | |
Anton 11-May-2007 [149] | I would be interested in the list of scripts you use, where you place them, and how you use them. I probably wouldn't just download and install your entire config as I have established my own ways of working. I would inspect each piece and see if it has value to me. |
Mario 11-May-2007 [150x2] | Anton: if you are interested in "my" collection it is just one script with a data file and I plan to make it available via rebol.it |
The script loads the data file that contains info on the files and how to download handle them. Archives are usually downloaded and unpacked. You just have to put both files in a directory and run the script. | |
older newer | first last |