World: r3wp
[Linux] group for linux REBOL users
older newer | first last |
Volker 25-Jun-2007 [1623] | brrr. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/112402 https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FakeRaidDebug Please try the latest gutsy gibbon livecd and see if that works for you. That may be an idea. |
Graham 25-Jun-2007 [1624] | Lol |
Volker 25-Jun-2007 [1625] | gutsy is the test-version, but you could try if they managed to deal with it. if your raid shows up there, you have at least a chance^^ |
Graham 25-Jun-2007 [1626x2] | perhaps I should wait for the friggin freaky version ? |
oops.. passed that one. | |
Volker 25-Jun-2007 [1628x2] | Better than the Late Longhorn^^ |
Or try a 2.4-kernel. someone said they have drivers on their site | |
TimW 2-Jul-2007 [1630x2] | I hae altme in a directory in my user home directory /home/user/altme and if I click on it there it puts all files in that altme directory which is what I want, but if I try to link to /home/user/altme/altme or start it from the command line it always tries to install again and put the files in my user directory /home/user. Does anyone know how to symlink it so it opens in the sub directory? |
hae = have | |
Kaj 2-Jul-2007 [1632x2] | Unfortunately, this indeed seems to be how it behaves from the command line. So you can't do that, or start it automatically, unless you never start it from the graphical desktop |
It's a long-standing bug, and even the current Windows version seems to do something similar | |
TimW 2-Jul-2007 [1634] | bummer. Thanks anyway. |
Gabriele 3-Jul-2007 [1635] | create a altme.sh script that CDs to that dir then runs altme; then link to the script. |
Kaj 3-Jul-2007 [1636] | Thanks |
Alan 3-Jul-2007 [1637] | finely got Altme working on mandriva using wine,now I can click on a link and it opens the browser :) Altme worked before without wine but could never click on a link and open the browser |
TimW 3-Jul-2007 [1638] | The shell script worked great. Thanks! |
PhilB 6-Jul-2007 [1639] | Newbie to Ubuntu ... how do I install Rebol on Ubuntu s that I can double click on a .r file and it to run Rebol ? I have downloaded the Debian version of View ... if I double click on the Rebol executable I getthe desktop .... if I then click on the Console the desktop dissapears but I dont get a console. Any ideas ? |
Kaj 6-Jul-2007 [1640x2] | The REBOL console doesn't work on Linux, sadly. Although you could use the Windows version under Wine |
To get .r files to start in REBOL, just rightclick on one, go to Properties, then to Open With, add REBOL/View and make that the default | |
PhilB 6-Jul-2007 [1642] | Thanks Kaj .... I did manage to get a console to work under 6.10 but cant remember how I did it (I think it was by running rebol from the terminal). |
Kaj 6-Jul-2007 [1643] | Yes, running Core, or View in text mode, from the Linux shell is no problem |
Gabriele 6-Jul-2007 [1644x3] | if you make a shortcut, you should be able to select "run from terminal" (exact way depends on if you're on Ubuntu or Kubuntu). |
also, you should be able to add the .r association manually in the file browser. i have it working in kubuntu. | |
anyway, i prefer just working for the shell most of the times. | |
btiffin 13-Jul-2007 [1647x3] | Is this going to break anything for getting a valid status code out of call? cap: func [calls /local sherr status] [ sherr: copy "" append calls { ; echo -n $? >&2} status: call/wait/info/error calls sherr status/exit-code: to integer! find/last/tail sherr newline status ] Of course this is stripped down (the whole /console /output etc, combination thing to handle), but it seems to be working for getting at exit status. Dirty pool? cheap trick? or functional? Gabriele; any hints or comments? |
Update; set -o pipefail needs to be set in the forked shell to get proper pipeline status. ... insert head calls {set -o pipefail ; } append calls { ; echo -n $? >&2} ... | |
{ ; echo -ne "\n$?" >&2} works better...when you test with commands that don't fail or fail without stderr :) gotta love being not-quite-right all the time. | |
Gabriele 14-Jul-2007 [1650] | it is an acceptable workaround in most cases i guess. |
btiffin 21-Jul-2007 [1651] | Henrik; Remember a while back you got a Killed message? I just got one, and here is a snippet from the kernel log. 1 dev kernel: oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x200d2, order=0 ...addresses and other cracker info removed... 1 dev kernel: Out of Memory: Kill process 6448 (bash) score 95256 and children. 1 dev kernel: Out of memory: Killed process 6469 (orebol). I'm guessing you had the same scenario. |
Henrik 22-Jul-2007 [1652x2] | btiffin, ok. I can hardly remember it now :-) |
http://osnews.com/comment.php?news_id=18304&offset=0&threshold=&msg=8#257159 I love the "I wonder..." thread. It says a lot about Linux development. | |
Kaj 22-Jul-2007 [1654] | Yeah. For the record, we in the Syllable project don't think this means much. It's a small addition to the Linux kernel that can't be used for much |
Henrik 26-Jul-2007 [1655] | http://apcmag.com/6735/interview_con_kolivas<--- interesting interview with a guy who recently quit linux kernel development. Amiga is mentioned. |
Geomol 26-Jul-2007 [1656] | Yes, an interesting read. I didn't know, things were that bad. |
Alan 26-Jul-2007 [1657] | as a Linux newbie, I can attest that Linux for the user is bloated.To get more people to use Linux,they need to put the stuff that Joe Sixpack wants |
Geomol 26-Jul-2007 [1658] | Linux has been there for so many years, so I don't see that happen in the future. Some of the code might be emigrated to other OSs with other designs, but then it isn't Linux anymore. As I see it, Linux as a desktop OS is a dead end. |
Henrik 26-Jul-2007 [1659x3] | I think the main thing that a lot of linux developers won't see, is that in the long run an "evolution" approach to development (code something and see if it'll float or sink), doesn't work as well as the "intelligent design" approach. I could see that in a discussion recently on OSNews. |
I'm seeing Linux kernel development as this big mountain of clay and 100s of people are throwing pieces of clay on it to make it bigger. :-) | |
if the clay sticks, it's good code. | |
Geomol 26-Jul-2007 [1662] | Funny, I was thinking of the "evolution" approach also, when I read the article. I agree, the "evolution" approach is a bad idea, when dealing with computing code. "Keep it simple!" is what they often forget. |
Henrik 26-Jul-2007 [1663] | the thing is, one thing is to do it generally, because you don't have the energy for design, but another thing is to actually defend it as a good development method. that is why I think also that Linux as a desktop won't move forward. Perhaps now the best parts of Linux is actually what came out in the beginning, with the original GNU tools and not new tools being developed today. |
btiffin 26-Jul-2007 [1664] | I'm of a different opinion. GNU/Linux will make it to the desktop. It IS my desktop. Vista is buried under the GRUB and that's were it stays. Buried. Many many people are working on the Desktop issues right now....like right now...3:15pm eastern standard time. Con's experience may just be a matter of bad-timing. The first brave front runners get cut down, then the masses have a way of getting to the goal. His efforts will not go unnoticed, but he may feel nothing but pain and misery for it. Human nature. |
Volker 26-Jul-2007 [1665x2] | Sounds like Con wrote excellent clay and was thrown out by the cathedral-designers. Not the other way around. Seems linux-kernel lost its bazaar-abilities. |
BTW a similar scheduler was written by a hig priest and was quickly included. quite unfair. and the article is about kernel, not desktop, as con mentions in comments | |
PatrickP61 26-Jul-2007 [1667] | Too many cooks in the kitchen |
Volker 26-Jul-2007 [1668x2] | and the problems interest-problems stem from interest of the developers, which are enterprise-driven today. |
not according to that article. | |
btiffin 26-Jul-2007 [1670] | rebols have to worry about the same disenfranchisement imho. Somedays it seems the lure of wxPython or Tcl/Tk, or D, or LUA, or even frick'n Windows ... would be an easier long term road to get and keep happy customers. That feeling passes with the next little nugget of knowledge (and a little stubborness). REBOL WILL get RIF, REBin, LNS, Rebcode, formatted strings and all the cool stuff that seems just around the corner. AND it will all run on Debian GNU/Linux and I'll be able to dump Wine for once and for all, and then slowly convince people to move away from the darkside. :) Can you tell I'm a little s and t of cleaning off people's PC's just to watch them click up IE and Outlook and MSN AGAIN. |
Izkata 26-Jul-2007 [1671x2] | Volker: You must also remember that everyone is human - I think that's what most people forget. How he presented his code to the developers could easily have been the reason they didn't include it. I haven't seen the kernel mailing list myself, so I can't say for sure, but - he said it's a very unfriendly place, and so likely positioned himself accordingly, defensively. He said himself that defended his work as much as possible - without budging. That's the kind of person I hate working with, and the kind of person I actively ignore. |
And, I agree with btiffin - the Linux desktop is getting there, slowly but surely. Especially Ubuntu, which my *mom* wants me to install when she gets her laptop, after having checked out mine a couple of times. I only use Windows for video games that don't run well under WINE. | |
older newer | first last |