r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group

[unknown: 9]
15-Dec-2005
[792]
I have original Rebol flags (desktop size).  I will throw one in 
to the 4rth and 5th place winners. : )
Volker
16-Dec-2005
[793x5]
If its a mac mini i learn graphics..
I would use seperate sizes for media and script. script maybe 8k? 
its a demo, and a month. media should be more. because one feature 
is, take a photo and do crazy things with it. a photo in 32k is not 
much. a script of 32k takes some month work (its a demo, so it should 
be "this does in 32k what others do in 32k*8, and that kind of compression 
takes time)
How about not only graphics demos, but networking too? Once there 
was a contest for a mud (text-moorg) in 16k, and some entries where 
playable and interesting they said.
And there should be multiple levels, best guru, best beginner, so 
students have more hope. (and i am a graphics-beginner, so - Ha! 
;)
how about word-length? if size is limited, demos become: insert d 
a: b + c. a low limit, medium length 3-5 chars?
BrianH
16-Dec-2005
[798]
Compress should deal with word length.
Volker
16-Dec-2005
[799x2]
good point.
How about an old good amiga too? Or this newer one, (genesis?)
[unknown: 9]
16-Dec-2005
[801]
I vote keep it simple, and based on the feedback of this one, we 
step it up a notch next year, which can be the day after if we get 
our asses in gear and post this ASAP! LOL
Volker
16-Dec-2005
[802]
Gel is 1346 bytes and the images 25k
Rebolek
16-Dec-2005
[803]
I think 32kB all together is good. Remember that some Amiga demos 
were only 4kB with sound and graphics!
Volker
16-Dec-2005
[804]
if i trade 8 k in resolution for 8k in script-size i double my script-size. 
i do not like that.
Rebolek
16-Dec-2005
[805]
If I remember correctly, demo categories were 4k, 64k and mega-demo 
(unlimited size). Maybe for next demo contest we can have  these 
categories but this year I prefer to stick with 32k. I wonder if 
rebcode can be used or not. Although I love rebcode, it's still only 
in alpha, so it seems to be more fair when rebcode is not allowed.
Cyphre
16-Dec-2005
[806]
Not sure If anyone mentioned it. THe demoshould run on View 1.3.2 
so NO rebcode...(this is confirmed by Carl)
Rebolek
16-Dec-2005
[807]
OK, so 1) Is there a web site set up for the RDC yet? 2) The deadline 
is 31-12/11:59:59. Is it GMT? 3) I hope that 32kB limitaion is final. 
Is that true? 3) Will the submited demos be available publicly before 
deadline? (I vote no). Hm, I've got only 14 days left. I should better 
hurry up ;)
yeksoon
16-Dec-2005
[808]
I think that is the beauty of this challenge.


How little time (and code) allows u to create something wonderful..
[unknown: 9]
16-Dec-2005
[809]
Deadline should be GMT = 0!  As in England.

I agree demos can't be seen before deadline, but  we can post past 
demos.

I'm going to try to work with Carl to buld a clear page (on Rebol.com 
I hope).
Allen
16-Dec-2005
[810]
I liked idea of a an ongoing weekly comp.. like back in 1999 http://web.archive.org/web/19991013041056/rebol.com/contest.html
. Haven't found the how to enter page though.
Josh
16-Dec-2005
[811]
Agreed, Allen
Graham
16-Dec-2005
[812x6]
I think there are better things we can do with our time.
Gregg's response to the OSX widgets thread on the maling list suggests 
another possibility.
If RT were to create a dashboard, the community could create the 
widgets for this .. either as a weekly or monthly competition.
we would have to have some security guides as to what we can do, 
and for safetely RT could host the accepted widgets.
This would be a much more useful activity that demos that only provide 
eye candy.
Achieve both aims in one go.
Rebolek
16-Dec-2005
[818]
I think RDC should be announced on ML as well. But by someone more 
official than me :)
Graham
16-Dec-2005
[819x2]
In essence the dashboard could be a custom version of the Rebol Desktop.
It sounds very much to me, or hasn't used Konfabulator etc, that 
is what it is anyway.
PhilB
16-Dec-2005
[821]
There is typo on the Rebol License page (mentioned is one of Carl's 
blogs ....) .... under the section for Rebol IOS , the text says 
Rebol/SDK is not free, rather that Rebol/IOS is not free..
Terry
17-Dec-2005
[822]
Can the demo be OS specific?
[unknown: 9]
17-Dec-2005
[823]
I would vote note.
Volker
18-Dec-2005
[824]
What means os-specific? Only windows has agg-fonts, which is cool 
for demos. And mac-alpha lacks even timers.
Terry
18-Dec-2005
[825]
well, there ya go then.
Rebolek
18-Dec-2005
[826]
When only windows version of 1.3.2 has font support in AGG, is it 
considered as an OS specific feature? I hope not.
Pekr
18-Dec-2005
[827x3]
Kru - imo os-specific feature is the one, which will not allow your 
script to run on other platforms without change ...
so - if your script will run under both linux and windows, and just 
windows will look somehow prettier, than it should be tolerated. 
But e.g. OS-X still lacking timers is imo disqulifying OS-X version 
pretty much ...
btw - what is the status of OS-X version? IIRC it was high on priority 
list and it is long time since View was released last time. Is that 
so big problem to not implement timers for OS-X in half a year or 
how long it is since View release? ;-)
Terry
18-Dec-2005
[830]
Hey, I'll submit this .. WYSIWYG editor for http://squigglz.com
 try editing the ~sandbox~ squiggle.
Henrik
18-Dec-2005
[831]
pekr, ask Jamie :-) He's working on it.
Will
18-Dec-2005
[832]
yap, OS X status is frustrating..8(
[unknown: 9]
18-Dec-2005
[833]
Terry, cool.

Please offer bigger (taller edit window).


Just so you know. "All Rights Reserved" has no legal meaning...  
so if you are inclined, get rid of it.  IT cleans up the page.
Sunanda
20-Dec-2005
[834]
Do we have any rules, or even a deadline more accurate than "early 
january" for the proposed demo competition?

I know Reichart posted a comprehensive set of very sensible answers 
to Carl's questions, but the the blog (or elsewhere) hasn't been 
updated to adopt or adapt his suggestions.
Rebolek
20-Dec-2005
[835]
Rules are: one script, max 32kB, must run in View 1.3.2. Deadline 
is Dec 31st 11:59:59 GMT . Dunno if AM or PM...?
yeksoon
20-Dec-2005
[836]
probably 1 second before the next year
Sunanda
21-Dec-2005
[837]
Kru -- where has that actually been agreed?

All I see is a set of suggestions from Reichart that Carl has commented 
on as being "good"


As far as any non-REBOL3 reader is concerned the rules are in draft 
format, suggest an "early January" deadline, and are still open to 
change via suggestions to Gabriele:
http://www.rebol.net/article/0235.html


It would be very bad X-Internet messaging marketing if a winner was 
announced while some people were not aware the contest had even started.


A fair deadline would be one month from the official announcement 
of the competition. That hasn't happened yet and as far as I know, 
it was never Carl's intention to limit entry to REBOL3 participants.
yeksoon
21-Dec-2005
[838]
guess it will be good for a 'Valentines Challenge' rahter than a 
year end challenge
Sunanda
21-Dec-2005
[839]
A REBOL lovers'  date :-)


rebolek seems to have announced the competition using Reichart's 
suggestions:

http://rebolek.blogspot.com/2005/12/rebol-demo-contest-great-rdc-2005.html

But that seems to me to be premature given that Gabriele or Carl 
have not codified the rules or made an official announcement that 
the competition has started.
Rebolek
21-Dec-2005
[840]
heh sunanda you found my blog? :) I've never linked it anywhere, 
because I'm still just testing it :) so I won't call that "official" 
announcement. Anyway, today is Wednesday, the Q&A day, so we can 
ask in RT Q&A group about RDC status.
Volker
21-Dec-2005
[841]
IIRC its in technoraty. :)