REBOL/BASE testing
[1/11] from: rebol-list2::seznam::cz at: 12-Oct-2002 19:38
Hello rebol-list,
I've finally found some time to test the Rebol/base...
I choosed one of my cgi scripts and set the Rebol/base as the
interpreter, I had to add decode-cgi function to this script to make
it working and run this simple test:
>> t: now/time/precise loop 1000 [read http://127.0.0.1/cgi-bin/system/poc3.r?i=rur-tes]
t2: now/time/precise - t
== 0:00:36.552
>> t: now/time/precise loop 1000 [read http://127.0.0.1/cgi-bin/system/poc.r?i=rur-tes]
t2: now/time/precise - t
== 0:01:11.342
As you can see the Rebol/BASE is almost 3 times faster. It really worhts to
rewrite some of the server-side scripts to be runable with it:-))
PS: I'm now thinking about some way how to find and import the missing
functions into the Rebol/Base from Core, do you have any ideas?
[2/11] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 15-Oct-2002 20:44
RebOldes wrote:
>Hello rebol-list,
> I've finally found some time to test the Rebol/base...
<<quoted lines omitted: 13>>
>PS: I'm now thinking about some way how to find and import the missing
>functions into the Rebol/Base from Core, do you have any ideas?
Yes, wait for the probably free FastCGI protocol from DocKimbel - it
will be 10 times faster at least ;-)
-pekr-
[3/11] from: rebol-list2:seznam:cz at: 15-Oct-2002 21:51
R> As you can see the Rebol/BASE is almost 3 times faster. It really worhts to
R> rewrite some of the server-side scripts to be runable with it:-))
but the problem may be, that there is no Linux version of Rebol/Base
yet :(
[4/11] from: gchiu:compkarori at: 16-Oct-2002 10:34
On Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:38:21 +0200
RebOldes <[rebol-list2--seznam--cz]> wrote:
>As you can see the Rebol/BASE is almost 3 times faster.
>It really worhts to
>rewrite some of the server-side scripts to be runable
>with it:-))
Hi,
Why do you think it is faster? Is it because it loads
faster being a smaller binary?
How about execution speed? Is it unchanged?
I'm certainly prepared to rewrite if execution is faster,
but not so prepared if it just reflects loading times for
a script that might run a few times a day only.
--
Graham Chiu
[5/11] from: andreas:bolka:gmx at: 15-Oct-2002 23:50
Saturday, October 12, 2002, 6:38:21 PM, RebOldes wrote:
> As you can see the Rebol/BASE is almost 3 times faster. It really
> worhts to rewrite some of the server-side scripts to be runable with
> it:-))
i would rewrite a lot of them, if only rebol/base was available for
linux/unix.
--
Best regards,
Andreas mailto:[andreas--bolka--gmx--net]
[6/11] from: greggirwin:mindspring at: 15-Oct-2002 17:29
Hi Graham,
<< Why do you think it is faster? Is it because it loads
faster being a smaller binary? >>
Per Carl S., things like network protocols can take a bit of time to load,
along with lots of other functions you may not need. So you add back in only
the pieces that you're using and eliminate the load time of all the stuff
you're not. Nothing else should change, performance wise, I imagine. The
size of the binary should have very little to do with it.
--Gregg
[7/11] from: jason:cunliffe:verizon at: 15-Oct-2002 15:00
> Yes, wait for the probably free FastCGI protocol from DocKimbel - it
> will be 10 times faster at least ;-)
Will that run on any REBOL installation?
./Jason
[8/11] from: nodep:dds:nl at: 15-Oct-2002 23:38
Citeren RebOldes <[rebol-list2--seznam--cz]>:
Hi reboldes,
Just out of currio.. What is rebol/base??
Seems im always missing the latest news flashes... :-)
(R)egards,
Norman.
[9/11] from: greggirwin:mindspring at: 15-Oct-2002 18:00
Hi Norman,
<< Just out of currio.. What is rebol/base?? >>
Carl S. posted it a couple weeks ago. It's basically a stripped down version
or Core that is designed to boot faster for CGI use and use less memory for
small devices (< 600K base memory footprint).
It's available at http://www.reboltech.com/downloads/ if you want to try it
out.
--Gregg
[10/11] from: brett:codeconscious at: 16-Oct-2002 12:41
As far as I'm aware, it is not really released - it is an Alpha version
meant for testing.
Brett.
[11/11] from: petr:krenzelok:trz:cz at: 16-Oct-2002 9:32
Jason Cunliffe wrote:
>>Yes, wait for the probably free FastCGI protocol from DocKimbel - it
>>will be 10 times faster at least ;-)
>>
>>
>
>Will that run on any REBOL installation?
>
>./Jason
>
I hope so ... it will be just it - rebol script - no additional
libraries. Once released, Rebol community finally gets PHP competitor,
as whatever speed-up Base offers you, it still uses CGI environment,
while Fast-CGI protocol will let your Rebol process in memory, so it
does not need to be started once again with new request.
MySQL and PostgresQL drivers are also encouraging ....
-pekr-
Notes
- Quoted lines have been omitted from some messages.
View the message alone to see the lines that have been omitted