[REBOL] Re: oss revisited (briefly!)
From: maarten:vrijheid at: 13-Feb-2004 23:11
>>>implementation, without a publicly available specification. That
>>>means that any effort to create another implementation is based on
>>>inferences, guesswork, etc. etc. etc. and can't be guaranteed to
>>>match precisely the behavior of the implementation from RT.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Yes, you're absolutely right on this point... specifications should be
>>public.
>>
>>
>>
>
>I still believe that this would be the biggest single step toward
>facilitating the growth of REBOL.
>
Even if it is a book, think of what it would teach us. I would pay an
SDK fee for learning all the things Carl and RT put in REBOL.
--Maarten
