[REBOL] Re: [blocked posts]
From: ingo:2b1 at: 29-Nov-2002 15:20
Hi Patrick,
your post seemed to arrive fine (the "just testing" one), with Pat665 in
the header, now we need to find out what my patch is doing differently ..=2E
[reboler--ifrance--com] wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> I did not use your patches.r before because I thought it was not
> necessary with b=EAta.
My patch is still based on the Core 2.3 send, and it evolved in a
direction a little different from the beta version. Will have to create
a new version, based on 2.5 'send some time.
> I have just tested it (not this post) and I am waiting.
>
> How come your version is greater than mine?
>
>> version tuple! 1.2.8.4.2
The first three numbers in the tell the Rebol Version number, the last
two the platform, where 3.1 is Windows, and 4.2 is Linux with libc6.
> How come Ladislav has no problem using the "regular" view (as it seems)?
Now that I don't know. May be it depends on one of the servers it
passes, or he has a patch in his system he forgot about? That's the
reason why I add a *PATCHED* marker in the doc strings of functions, at
least if I use help I get reminded that I don't use the official version.
> Thank you for all this trouble and hoping for the best.
You're welcome.
> Regards
> Patrick from Montpellier, not far away from Mende.
Thanks for the laugh, I'm sure I'll visit Montpellier within the next
half year, I'll check if you're really from Montpellier, then ;-)
Kind regards,
Ingo
