[REBOL] Re: Bug! in assignment to date! values with stacked set-path values
From: rotenca:telvia:it at: 14-Nov-2002 15:41
Hi Ladislav,
> The reason is this:
>
> a/(1 + 1): 5
>
> should be treated as
>
> a/2: 5
Yes, i undertand this. What i do not understand is what you means with "make
#"(" a forbidden char in words".
Are you asking something as:
to-word "(" ;== error!
And if this is the case, why?
I'm also asking myself if this notation:
a/(1 + 1) ;== a/2
is compatible with the less agressive evaluation of new betas. What do you
think?
---
Ciao
Romano