[REBOL] Re: Compatibility REBOL 2.x / REBOL 3.0 ?
From: gregg::pointillistic::com at: 10-Mar-2009 13:02
AM> I would think most scripts in r2 are either small enough to port with no
AM> problem or are looking for an excuse to rewrite: tighten up code, add new
AM> function etc.
Not for me. I have production code that is made of large and small
scripts, encapped apps, CGIs, and remote services. Qtask.com has a
*lot* of REBOL code behind it. Graham Chiu and others also have apps
out there for which porting is not an opportunity, but perhaps a
necessary (and risky) cost of doing business.