Mailing List Archive: 49091 messages
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search

[REBOL] Re: Tuples - Was Pair! thread

From: m:koopmans2:chello:nl at: 8-Feb-2002 22:47

Hi Mark, I agree there as well, but.... Rebol is some ten years younger than most of the languages you call there. Maybe it just takes time. All of us see the potential of REBOL, yet so few of us release something to attract attention to it. My best shot was Rugby, but it sure is not good enough for that (or by now people would know). If only we would code and promote REBOL half as much as writing to this list..... but then again, why would we? --maarten
> Hi, Romano, > > What I mean by mainstream is that REBOL gains enough traction with users
and developers that the market for REBOL products, be this interpreters, applications, books, tutorials, websites etc. becomes more active and self enforcing.
> Just a quick look at computer stores / magazines / websites / bookstores /
IT emplyment opprotunities etc. is enough to show you that REBOL isn't barely noticeable even in relation to other new small time languages like Ruby.
> PERL, Visual Basic, Java, C, C++, C#, Delphi, Python, Javascript, HTML,
even Lisp / Scheme / ML / Haskell have a more noticeable profile than REBOL and this hasn't changed much since 1998 when I first encountered REBOL.
> We had a brief period about two years ago when the 2 english language
books came out, but nothing since then. At my local bookstore these two REBOL titles have sat in the clearance shelfs at bargain basement prices and still nobody buys them.
> News articles, books, conferences, new applications, upgrades, job
vacancies etc happen for these other languages every other day / week / month. RT inc are doing a great job in advancing REBOL but they are a very small in terms of manpower and there is only so much they can do with the resources they have, that is why they could be considered a bottleneck as virtually everything major in relation to REBOL has to happen through them.
> Becoming multivendor and / or open source is the only way I can see REBOL
ever taking off as a technology unless RT Inc are bought out by one of the industry giants who would then hopefully promote REBOL and give it a higher level of visibility and commit greater resources to it. None of these scenarios is by any means a certainty.
> I hope for the best, and try to increase my understanding of the
multifaceted aspects of REBOL
> in the belief that someday I might in someway make a contribution to
greater choice & growth of REBOL as a technology.
> cheers everybody, > > Mark Dickson > > In a message dated Fri, 8 Feb 2002 11:58:11 AM Eastern Standard Time,
Romano Paolo Tenca <[rotenca--telvia--it]> writes: