[REBOL] Re: FOR question...
From: petr:krenzelok:seznam:cz at: 26-Mar-2009 6:41
Carl Read napsal(a):
> On Thursday, 26-March-2009 at 6:08:52 Petr Krenzelok wrote,
>
> -pekr- said...
>
>> And when I need to know the position, then I use old-school for loop :-)
>>
>
> Has FOR been made a native in R3, or is it still a mezzanine function - and hence still
slow? I find it's the best choice of loop sometimes, but knowing it's slower than it
should be annoys me.
>
yes, help in R3 console reveals it is a native function in R3 ...
-pekr-