AltME groups: search
Help · search scripts · search articles · search mailing listresults summary
world | hits |
r4wp | 204 |
r3wp | 3029 |
total: | 3233 |
results window for this page: [start: 3201 end: 3233]
world-name: r3wp
Group: #Boron ... Open Source REBOL Clone [web-public] | ||
Kaj: 9-Jul-2006 | If you want to spread this link, on the REBOL mailing list for example, please do | |
Joe: 16-Jul-2006 | Is anybody planning to take on Orca development ? I wanted to reply to Karl R. message in the Orca mailing list asking him for 1) move license to MIT/BSD 2) what he doesn't like about rebol that prompted him to abandon the project | |
PeterWood: 17-Nov-2009 | There was a message on the ORCA mailing list yesterday bu Karl Robillard annoucing a new incarnation called Boron. The Boron wiki page is at http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/urlan/wiki/BoronProject | |
Kaj: 23-Jun-2010 | Yes, it's Karl, and he has a mail address and mailing list at SourceForge | |
Kaj: 28-Feb-2011 | Anyway, I don't have OS X, so the best thing to do is to take this up with Karl on the Boron mailing list | |
Group: Core ... Discuss core issues [web-public] | ||
Gregg: 3-Feb-2012 | If the func doesn't take a lit-word/get-word argument, it should evaluate and pass as an object. Now, if you have a block of words that refer to list faces, and you pass that word, that's what you get. If your func has types defined for the args, that can help catch issues like this. | |
Maxim: 9-Feb-2012 | Our datasets are huge and we optimise for performance by unfolding and indexing a lot of stuff into rules... for example instead of parsing by a list of words, I parse by a hierarchical tree of characters. its much faster since the speed is linear to the length of the word instead of to the number of items in the table. i.e. the typical O*n vs. O*O*n type of scenario . just switching to parse already was 10 times faster than using hash! tables and using find on them.... In the end, we had a 100 time speed improvement from before parse to compiled parse datasets. this means going from 30 minutes to less than 20 seconds....but this comes at a huge cost in RAM... a 400MB Overhead to be precise. | |
Group: Red ... Red language group [web-public] | ||
Dockimbel: 6-Jan-2012 | My floating point support todo-list for Red/System: http://groups.google.com/group/red-lang/browse_thread/thread/5fe1e6bde8576d51?hl=en | |
Dockimbel: 6-Jan-2012 | what is that channel? Just the Red's mailing-list, nothing new there. | |
Dockimbel: 10-Jan-2012 | Yes, using system/args-count and system/args-list, see: http://static.red-lang.org/red-system-specs.html#section-12 | |
Pekr: 15-Jan-2012 | Doc just tweeted about floating point support improvement - the list got updated - https://github.com/dockimbel/Red/wiki/Floating-point-support-todo-list | |
Dockimbel: 25-Jan-2012 | Great, let me know when your ImageMagic binding will be ready, so I'll add it to the list of existing bindings. | |
Dockimbel: 28-Jan-2012 | And would avoid to add them in the "keywords list". | |
Dockimbel: 31-Jan-2012 | Newbies info: well, from all the presentations slides, you can see that Red is meant to be a "general purpose" programming language, so making any list of possible applications would be restrictive and probably also premature as Red is not yet implemented. GUI is certainly a feature to have, but I wouldn't make it part of the "core" language, rather handle it as library. One remark about future Red GUI support, there will probably be several GUI frameworks available (we already have GTK+, I'll add a native one, and someone could contribute a View clone), I'll try to put a common VID-like dialect on top of them, so we can quickly switch from one to another with minimal changes needed. | |
Dockimbel: 31-Jan-2012 | You can also add HTML5 to the list of future GUI frameworks. ;-) | |
Dockimbel: 31-Jan-2012 | I guess that a context-free grammar would have required some arguments list delimiter, such as C and most other languages have. | |
Evgeniy Philippov: 31-Jan-2012 | end of list of arguments is uncertain | |
Pekr: 1-Feb-2012 | Doc - congrats on finishing floating support in Red/System. Now all to-do list items seems to be done right? So time to move on onto Red itself? :-) | |
Kaj: 2-Feb-2012 | type: list/type value: list/value | |
Dockimbel: 2-Feb-2012 | Kaj, I've been able to reproduce a similar behavior (having 12 in list/value instead of an address) using a small program, I'm analyzing it right now. | |
Dockimbel: 7-Feb-2012 | Red/System: already anwsered by me, Kaj and others (also, there's a todo list on red-lang.org for contributors that are searching for tasks to handle). | |
Oldes: 7-Feb-2012 | todo list - you mean the roadmap? | |
Kaj: 12-Feb-2012 | If they're not in the list, that would explain why they don't work, because the manual loading is needed to pull them in at run time | |
Group: World ... For discussion of World language [web-public] | ||
Geomol: 4-Dec-2011 | Yeah, STATS would be nice. It's not high on my list atm. | |
Geomol: 4-Dec-2011 | Fixing the routine part is high on my list. | |
PeterWood: 4-Dec-2011 | Do you have a place to keep a list of REBOL incompatibilities? For example: ** Error: set has no refinement called any | |
PeterWood: 4-Dec-2011 | Nenad uses Github issues for bug and feature request tracking for Red though perhaps the wiki would be better for a List of REBOL incompatabilities? | |
sqlab: 5-Dec-2011 | I do not remember clear, if all versions of R2 or R3 gave warnings at first start, but now they are in my exception list. And at least once I got suspicious of R2 too, as it initialized / loaded libraries not needed. The curious thing is, that now I do not get a warning at start of world again. And I did not allow it, but choosed "ask again". | |
Geomol: 9-Dec-2011 | Better error! implementation is high on my list. Also needed to implement TRY. | |
Geomol: 9-Dec-2011 | You list of 5 things: 1) Not sure, I wanna do that. It takes time away from me finishing version 1. 2) I have set the goals for ver. 1. 3) No (see Q&A) 4) "Ask for cooperation" - World would need schemes for the different protocols. I will welcome others work in that area. Me (and most likely others too) would like to see World on more platforms than the current 3. Host kit is open source. I will welcome ports to other platforms. (That's what I can think of for now, but I'll keep it in mind.) 5) It's faster for me to write the documentation than building a comm/doc infrastructure. I'll write the World 'bible'. Work has started, and I'll use more time on it, when version 1 is a bit closer. | |
Geomol: 9-Dec-2011 | I just thought of another way to help. Make a list of REBOL functions missing. There are many missing from %rebol.w And there already is a wiki started with differences from REBOL at: https://github.com/Geomol/World/wiki/Differences-from-REBOL I don't have time to write it. But everybody can write in that wiki. Now, go try World out. And remember to have fun! | |
Group: REBOL Syntax ... Discussions about REBOL syntax [web-public] | ||
Steeve: 24-Feb-2012 | Okkkkk, there is a huge list for the serialized ones ;-) | |
Cyphre: 24-Feb-2012 | just write: ? datatype! in the console to get some list |
3201 / 3233 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ... | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | [33] |