AltME groups: search
Help · search scripts · search articles · search mailing listresults summary
world | hits |
r4wp | 330 |
r3wp | 2720 |
total: | 3050 |
results window for this page: [start: 401 end: 500]
world-name: r3wp
Group: !AltME ... Discussion about AltME [web-public] | ||
[unknown: 5]: 4-Jan-2005 | I should have clarified a bit more. I'm looking for an ALTME like solution | |
Graham: 21-Feb-2005 | ok, I guess I need to read up a bit about this to understand it better. | |
Guest: 29-Mar-2005 | 1. A switch to turn off notification about new messages. On XP, the minimized window's icon blinks for every new message, which can become a little bit annoying. 2. A switch to 'subscribe' only selected groups - in a sense of "Only mark group with new messages if subscribed". Otherwise, get message silently but don't mark group red for having unread messages. 3. A "newer than new" feature: Whilst AltME is online and one is working in another app, inform (in a popup window or alike) when one returns to it: "New messages in the following groups:" which can easily be clicked away if none of the groups are of special interest. | |
yeksoon: 14-Apr-2005 | 'dot' it whenever u feel that AltMe or the world is a bit too quiet.. send a dot to yourself..or to some group | |
Sunanda: 14-Aug-2005 | I think we may have different definitions of efficient. To me, using a bit of software as buggy as Altme is not efficient - which is why I've never felt able to recommend it as groupware (see earlier dicussion). I've been joining in with the REBOLn worlds because it is useful, though painful at times. The problem, of course, isn't the bugs. It's the rate at which they get fixed. | |
Anton: 22-Aug-2005 | The other day, I cut off my dialup connection about 10 seconds after starting AltME. The next day I connected, looked in Advocacy group and there were no new messages. I posted a message, and then it synced about 10 messages that had occurred during the intervening time. Just a bit more feedback on this problem.. in case it helps. I usually don't notice any such sync problem. | |
Group: Core ... Discuss core issues [web-public] | ||
Pekr: 10-Jan-2005 | In Silesion group, late today I will post about what I have in plan and will "complain" a bit about IOS ... it is so primitive db vise, that it is not much usable ... | |
eFishAnt: 14-Jan-2005 | parsing binary is a bit different than parsing ASCII...and I have done a bit for mp4...but I think your point of making it simple is a good thing. | |
Cyphre: 14-Jan-2005 | Interfacing with lower-level naguages (such as C) from Rebol looks a bit harder but when you gain more experience with it (=no crashes anymore ;)) you realize it works logically. I was also dissapointed for the firt time I tried to use some DLL. But now I'm more optimistic. The only think I miss is the callback handling. | |
Group: Script Library ... REBOL.org: Script library and Mailing list archive [web-public] | ||
Gabriele: 25-Aug-2006 | btw, if you have suggestions, please let me know. i'll be working a bit more on it on monday. | |
Maxim: 15-Sep-2006 | pow! all fixed :-) just need to let slim build the new release from all the included files and we are set ! I will also be doing just a little bit of cleanup within GLayout to reduce the size of the final single-file app... | |
Henrik: 28-Sep-2006 | well, I guess that's how things are right now. I do find it to be a bit elitist, you have to ask permission to come in here and most of the people know each other somewhat. | |
Henrik: 28-Sep-2006 | the IRC channels I visit can be a bit the same. It's like being a stranger walking into a bar full of people who know each other very well. either you are accepted or not. The elitist thing is not meant at anyone here, but I think it can be seen as elitist from the outside. :-) | |
Maxim: 29-Sep-2006 | so I ask this, is anyone willing to put a little bit of time where their mouth is... and help me organize the content of rebol.org. | |
Maxim: 29-Sep-2006 | I am willing to put a bit of time on structuring a vault of high-quality and re-useability functions and toolsets. Is anyone ready to help me put some time on it ? (speccing, coding, refactoring current sources, and/or management of submission of new code). | |
Sunanda: 8-Nov-2006 | Apologies -- REBOL.org was unavailable for just under a day, it's back now. The problem originated with the ISP, and it took them a little while to work out what they'd done wrong. Using a "non-standard" language seems to have added to their debug time: Extracts from two emails from the ISP's technical support: <<Hi, Sunanda. Sorry this is taking a bit. As I'm sure you know you have a non-standard setup :-) We aren't familiar with it and are puzzling it out. Am I right that you have your own scripting language? And that [snipped] is the [path to the] interpreter?>> <<Aha! Our web server rebooted yesterday. It's a FreeBSD server, and for a reason we haven't determined yet, the Linux compatability module didn't load. We loaded it and your site works again. We'll figure out why that module didn't load at boot.>> | |
btiffin: 16-Apr-2007 | Dear Library Team, I've only got a single script in the library, but I like it, and I'd like it to live through the R3 update. Are there any plans for adding explicit rebol versioning to scripts that want to stand the test of time? Is having multiple binaries on target REBOL platforms a no-no? Meaning, could the released binary packages for REBOL 3.0 include REBOL 1.3 (2.7) executables so scripts don't age out as fast as they did when going from 1.2 to 1.3? A little bit of configuring on the host OS to start the correct REBOL by extension, shebang, or resource fork on MacOS? Can DO add a secret launch of older/other binary if a Needs: is specified? Curious. | |
Sunanda: 1-May-2007 | That's a nice idea for a sort of "REBOL explainer" application. But it would be difficult to do in the Library. The Library does attempt to load and parse scripts -- that's how we do the colorisation. But (as with Gabriele's code) we rely on REBOL's own reflective abilities to tell us what is a word, function, operator etc. The Library runs an old version of Core (and even if we update that, we'd never run a version of View on a webserver) so it does not have access to all the information a proper explainer.highlighter would need. Take this script for example: http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/view-script.r?color=yes&script=reboldiff.r 'new-line is a valid REBOL word, but it is not colored: that's because it is not a word in the version we use. So sadly, the colorisation at REBOL.or remains a nice bit of eye candy rather than a solidly dependable feature. | |
Geomol: 30-May-2007 | Gregg, the Tiscali server (or network) was a bit slow last night. Try the links again, if you had trouble. | |
Gregg: 30-May-2007 | I prefer the color-code scheme over the VIM scheme (don't like the pink), but as long as it isn't too bright most anything should be OK. It would be interesting to do some research on using different rendering schemes for code, based on activity. For example, when writing and maintaining code, I like comments in gray, so they "fade out" a bit; but if you're reading code, in a Literate Programming sense, you probably want the prose to stand out and the code to be subordinate. | |
Geomol: 30-May-2007 | First example with test of colors: http://www.fys.ku.dk/~niclasen/rebol/example.html My idea is to build an example, that satisfies the need. Then I look at implementation for the Library, so sources in the library can be viewed this way. Maybe refinements shouldn't be that yellow!? Should background be a little gray like this? #f9f9f9 Or should it be white? The purple and blue might be a bit too bright compared to the red and green? Or should the red and green be brighter? | |
Geomol: 3-Jun-2007 | Regarding my css "Suggested standard" in the Libarary, I think, the red for values is a bit too dark. Also the orange for refinements seem a bit too light. | |
btiffin: 19-Jul-2007 | I liked this one from Dave Mills NTP RFC1305... There will exist an 200-picosecond interval, henceforth ignored, every 136 years when the 64-bit field will be zero and thus considered invalid. | |
Geomol: 1-Feb-2008 | Let's look at bit closer at the REBOL header block and licenses. In the library (http://www.rebol.org), REBOL scripts have a library entry in the header, and it contains a field named "license" with about 10 different possibilities. Is it enough to specify the license like that, or do we have to put a license text and/or warranty in the header of our scripts? Not just in the library but in general. Does anyone know, or should we ask an attorney? | |
Sunanda: 13-Mar-2009 | Results of a tiny bit of debugging on the ascii chars problem: -- problem seems to be at the input stage: -- if you have exended ascii characters (top bit set, like the 1/4 used in the script) what we get from the webserver is bad (extra, unexpected extended ascii chars) -- only download is (visibly) affected, although the extra extended ascii chars are present in the text streams -- though there is some REBOL mezz code (decode-cgi) that may be doing something I do not understand -- I can replicate the problem with both Apache and Xitami which suggests the problem may be in REBOL rather than a given server. -- the quick fix would be to add accept-charset="ISO-8859-1" to the <form ....> or <textarea ....> -- but that stops all extended ascii, including the ones we want. So we won't do that. -- the slower fix has yet to emerge from the available options. | |
Gabriele: 14-Mar-2009 | does not support UTF-8 - what do you mean by "support"? if you mean having native encoders/decoders, no, it does not. but, utf-8 is just 8 bit characters, and it is backwards compatible with ascii. if you can handle ascii, and leave alone any char > 127, you already support utf-8. | |
Sunanda: 14-Mar-2009 | Sadly, REBOL running as CGI under the two servers I've tested (Apache and Xitami) does not seem to support the whole range of ASCII -- ASCII chars with the 8th bit set seem to cause problems. I don't know where the problem really is, but right now, we do not even support 8-bit ASCII, let alone anything more modern :-) | |
Anton: 14-Mar-2009 | Sunanda, can you publish some files with the 8-bit ascii and note what the problems are ? | |
PeterWood: 14-Mar-2009 | I think the root of the problem is that when the Library system was first written, no account was taken of character encoding. As a result, not only is the data encoded as it was when originally submitted but the method of encoding is not even known. Whatever charset is specified in the http header is not going to be correct for all scripts and messages. Using charset=utf8 seems to cause the least problems. Though for example, it will cause many ISO-8859-1 "high bit" characters to be incorrectly displayed. | |
Chris: 14-Mar-2009 | Do you have any stats on how many 'high bit' characters are now contained in Library content? | |
Anton: 15-Mar-2009 | Sunanda, you're right about that ascii-math.r file. When I clicked the [Download script] link, the browser (konqueror) downloaded and directly opened it with the editor (SciTE). SciTE thought it was 8-bit ascii, and showed the characters incorrectly. All I had to do was change the file encoding from 8-bit to utf-8 and the characters appeared correctly. I guess the editor had no way of determining the encoding, and incorrectly guessed 8-bit ascii. | |
Anton: 16-Mar-2009 | It seems the responsibility lies with the clients to interpret encodings properly. As we move to a unicode world, software assuming 8-bit encodings are some ASCII encoding should drop off. But until the transition is complete, there's not much we can do about client software guessing wrong like that, except stating the encoding in the script header, in the web page that provides the download link, and by helping confused newbies. | |
Anton: 17-Mar-2009 | Ok, so there are some editors which don't support unicode, don't guess encoding correctly, or can change encoding only with difficulty. How about this suggestion; if a rebol.org script is known to be UTF-8, then an additional link should appear: [Download as ASCII] download-a-script?script-name=ascii-math.r&encoded-as=8-bit-ascii which transcodes a UTF-8 file to ASCII. Just have to get a conversion function in place for this to work. | |
Anton: 18-Mar-2009 | I understand what you mean, and obviously the definition of "legacy" is a bit fuzzy. | |
Group: I'm new ... Ask any question, and a helpful person will try to answer. [web-public] | ||
[unknown: 9]: 16-Jan-2006 | That helps. since this one is such a pain we like to know everything about it. Eveyr little bit helps. But we are not convinced it is inside AltME. it might be a little deeper. | |
Group: Make-doc ... moving forward [web-public] | ||
Pekr: 9-Jan-2005 | I am not sure if I am wrong or not, but Open Office 2.0 should be a bit different - both faster, more MS Office compatible, but should also support open document format. If so, it is good for open office ... | |
eFishAnt: 11-Jan-2005 | gen-html doesn't even have a tag for enum2 or enum3 (but have to study a bit more | |
Group: MySQL ... [web-public] | ||
Maxim: 25-Jan-2005 | Doc. my very competent db admin, told me that it could simply be an issue that the client is expecting a reply from the sql server too quickly and that it is likely a simple timeout issue. HTH. if there is a way to let the tcp wait a bit more, it could be that the fraction of a second more needed might be all that is required. | |
JaimeVargas: 9-Aug-2005 | It could be RT, or they could come from 3rd parties. I guess the answer is time will tell. You can certainly express your views and requests to RT, they may change direction based on customer input. However the directions is a bit blurry right now. | |
Pekr: 31-Aug-2005 | what is your common rebol syntax you use mySQL driver with? I find it a bit difficult to use Doc's block mode, as I have to provide it with exactly the same amount of question marks, as there is amount of columns in the table (talking of insert here) | |
Pekr: 9-Jan-2006 | I fixed the protocol .... just latest bit is needed :-) | |
Group: Syllable ... The free desktop and server operating system family [web-public] | ||
Kaj: 31-Aug-2005 | The BeOS efforts are fractured, but Haiku seems to be doing quite well. Nevertheless, they're far behind Syllable. They can test parts on BeOS, but their own system is only running at a very basic level. They do have interesting pieces of code, and quite a bit of it at that. They use a BSD license, so any code we want, we can integrate into Syllable. :-) Soon we will release a port of the OpenBFS file system for Syllable | |
Volker: 3-Sep-2005 | fig yes. and every compiler-bit can be reused in the application as a menu-system :) | |
Kaj: 7-Sep-2005 | BZip2 compresses quite a bit better than Zip, and the CDs are fairly big, so... | |
BrianH: 20-Oct-2005 | VMware supports just about any Linux as a client with no difficulty. However, it requires a bit of hacking and testing to host VMware, so they have only done so on a few stable, commercial distributions like RedHat and SUSE. | |
Group: Linux ... [web-public] group for linux REBOL users | ||
Carl: 1-Mar-2006 | This may be a wild goose hunt. Hard to say. I'd just like to have something a bit more standard for our Linux distro. | |
Carl: 2-Mar-2006 | Let me back up a bit. No Linux wars here please. I have about 10 different Linux distros running.. | |
Carl: 2-Mar-2006 | So, I studied the situation a bit, and found that Debian is really the meat behind a lot of these distros, and someone I trust suggested that Debian made a better dev platform and would provide the perfect build standard for us. | |
Anton: 4-May-2006 | Bit confused by that. | |
Gabriele: 19-Jun-2006 | in your case though... updating the glibc is a bit risky, i remember completely trashing a version of RH (or was it Mandrake?) by just a glibc update. it was a long time ago though. | |
Pekr: 7-Aug-2006 | so to enter directory, I need to set x bit for it? | |
Pekr: 7-Aug-2006 | thanks ... the problem probably was, that for a directory, there needs to be "execute" bit set, or you can't enter it ... | |
Tomc: 7-Aug-2006 | lower s it the "sticky" bit for dirs to cause item under them to take on the same permissions and ownership only applies to directories owner and group (but effects files) upper case S I am not recalling off the top of my head ... applies to files scriptable or sockets or something | |
Pekr: 7-Aug-2006 | I thought the sticky bit is T? | |
Tomc: 7-Aug-2006 | on solaris sticky bit is 's' i would be suprised if linux strayed that much | |
Gabriele: 8-Aug-2006 | write access means you can add files to the dir, but to write on them you need to be able to access files in the dir which is the execute bit. i think you can probably use the touch command to create new files on dirs with rw- (not sure though) but for complete access to a dir you need rwx. | |
Alan: 26-Sep-2006 | I have an AMD 64 bit Acer laptop running Mandriva and have no problem running Rebol/Altme but I use KDE so not sure what would happen if you tried to used another windows manger with it | |
Alan: 27-Sep-2006 | Rebolek, yes there is a 64 bit version | |
Group: XML ... xml related conversations [web-public] | ||
Volker: 7-Nov-2005 | together with a bit unix for copy/deep test-directories and a diff later. | |
CarstenK: 12-Nov-2005 | in the moment i play a little bit with xml-parse.r, it has a lot of things done, some are still open (like <!ENTITY ...> parsing) and it is like SAX - I try to implement some handlers to learn REBOL, but it's still in progess. A benefit of xml-parse is, that there would be only one parser and some kind of standard API and the handler could then generate rebxml or some other desired format | |
Maxim: 12-Apr-2006 | Geomol, just looked over rebxml... I've build a similar engine, even simpler actually. but it might become a little bit smarter in a few weeks... maybe supporting more of the XML 1.0 specs like &chars conversion and such. | |
Pekr: 28-Apr-2006 | this group exists for a long time, and IIRC initially we were more or less discussing rebol - XML interoperability - SAX or DOM parser in rebol .... while from what is being discussed now, sounds like slightly bit different topic? | |
MichaelB: 28-Apr-2006 | Jaime: that's what I meant too. But the discussion jumps around quite a bit and as some of these terms are unfamilar (besides the simple I know what you're talking about) - it's hard to know what to vote for :-). | |
Gabriele: 28-Apr-2006 | it turns out that i can do tree rewriting as a subset of dialect rewriting. it's a bit tricky but works well. | |
Henrik: 22-Oct-2008 | The HTML Dialect can do a bit of XML | |
Pekr: 4-Nov-2008 | wait a bit, I'll find it - it was cool stuff from XML REBOL guru. That person used it for his work ... | |
Chris: 3-Dec-2008 | All the 'into values are a bit of a pain, but work can be broken up... | |
Sunanda: 24-Jun-2009 | That makes life a bit simpler.....Objects with year-long lifespans can be harder to manage :) | |
Maxim: 12-Oct-2010 | I use blocks, although a bit slower to access, they are faster for big loads cause thery require less ram and do not required binding which is a big issue on large XML blocks. | |
Group: DevCon2005 ... DevCon 2005 [web-public] | ||
Henrik: 19-Apr-2005 | if possible, also bring a bit better video and audio recording equipment. I liked last years videos, but the quality was poor | |
Gabriele: 20-Jun-2005 | so far 8 people sent in the survey email. we need a bit more to decide for dates and so on. | |
Group: PowerPack ... discussions about RP [web-public] | ||
Maarten: 28-Jun-2005 | Just did. Magic has a nice set of HTML functions but the drawback is that you need a daemon for session management, which won't work in a shared hosting env and is harder to keep alive. But is seems a bit more complete, so provided that you'll do the 3.5 translation as well I'd be happy to include it. | |
Group: Sound ... discussion about sound and audio implementation in REBOL [web-public] | ||
Anton: 15-Aug-2005 | Very nice looking ! May I criticise your knobs though ? They are a bit big. Before long, you won't have any room left ! :) I suggest make them half the size in width and height. | |
Rebolek: 16-Aug-2005 | but because there's no difference in speed of integer and FP math in REBOL, everything is done in FP sou it's needed to convert FP to 16-bit integer | |
Rebolek: 2-Feb-2006 | You can change waves, adjust modulation, filter, envelopes, wave shaper, bit crusher and so on... | |
Anton: 21-Apr-2009 | As you add together a larger number of waves, you will find the maximum amplitude is typically much less than the total of all the wave amplitudes. It might be easier to generate all the samples of the complex wave (using decimal!/float), keeping track of the maximum value, then scaling it to 8 or 16 bit integers afterwards. It would be nice to have a precise mathematical way of calculating the maximum peak values in advance, though... | |
Group: Rebol School ... Rebol School [web-public] | ||
Pekr: 4-Apr-2006 | hmm, I never thought about it, but you are probably right - I tought one of my friends rebol for quite some time, and he was always nervous a bit, when I told him - look, there is special function for that .... | |
JaimeVargas: 4-Apr-2006 | Ok. So moslty imperative programming languages. To get the gist of rebol I think you need to study a bit of the functional approach. | |
JaimeVargas: 4-Apr-2006 | Because C is a good abstraction of current hardware architectues. (It is a just bit better than assembly). | |
JaimeVargas: 4-Apr-2006 | If I had time I will translate the examples there to Rebol. Maybe you can do that while you learn. I can help you. My first attemp was to make the Class Factory from the book. I got it. However Oz the language of the book has bit better security than Rebol. But any how I was able to do this and in the process I learn a lot of good programming techniques. | |
Group: !Liquid ... any questions about liquid dataflow core. [web-public] | ||
Maxim: 19-Oct-2006 | I am hoping that this will help adoptance a bit. | |
Maxim: 5-Feb-2007 | oops typed a bit too quickly... do %slim.r slim/open 'liquid 0.6.4 | |
Maxim: 5-Feb-2007 | oops typed a bit too quickly... do %slim.r liquid: slim/open 'liquid 0.6.4 | |
Steeve: 16-Feb-2007 | *little bit | |
Steeve: 16-Feb-2007 | i've worked a bit on an MSX emulator in Rebol | |
Steeve: 16-Feb-2007 | a little bit | |
Maxim: 28-Feb-2007 | so... its a bit tough at first, cause you can't just go in and start off quickly... especially since some coding practices have to change to adapt to the paradigm... but in the end, you have no cleanup phase. so its a fair tradeoff... | |
Maxim: 7-May-2007 | thanks :-) took a bit of tweaking to get the stuff sorted out, but I'm starting to get the hang of AGG. | |
Pekr: 7-May-2007 | watching video, editing photos, chatting on icq, altme, a little bit of rebol coding, browsing web :-) | |
Group: DevCon2007 ... DevCon 2007 [web-public] | ||
Pekr: 29-Jan-2007 | excellent - most sites are just reference to hotel search portals. It would be really nice guys, if you would manage some eventual hotel discounts for conference participants. Well, maybe a good idea would be to advertise DevCon a bit, to know how many ppl would attend. Or you can do it other way - reserve e.g. 30 rooms, and use FIFO (first in first out) - even email would work to book room, no form needed ... | |
Cindy: 31-Jan-2007 | Usually hotels will hold a block of rooms until about 2 - 3 weeks prior to the event. We used a about 20 rooms in the previous two years so asking for 30 would work. I did notice while in Paris last year that there are many small hotels and the larger hotels can be a bit pricey. I think it does benefit to have the attendees stay in the same hotel. | |
Pekr: 31-Jan-2007 | I really do worry about conference a bit. No proper activity/propagation, call for sessions. The only one session so far is Carl's R3 introduction .... Hopefully it will all come ... | |
Anton: 5-Feb-2007 | yeah it's a bit like that. | |
Maxim: 5-Feb-2007 | not just people who have spare time cause their lives are bit less "filled"... | |
Maxim: 9-Feb-2007 | its getting a bit last minute IMHO. | |
Pekr: 10-May-2007 | Sooo the conference starts in 20 minutes ... no live stream yet, I am a bit worried :-) | |
Pekr: 10-May-2007 | video is pinky, sounds is good, although a bit jerky from time to time ... | |
Group: DevCon2008 (post-chatter) ... DevCon2008 [web-public] | ||
Brock: 6-Oct-2007 | I'm actually in Ottawa, Canada, the down-under was a bit of joke about being from where I "don't get much sun" | |
NickA: 12-Dec-2008 | completely beat any of my efforts. It has opened some new interesting doors for me, though (now learning Openlaszlo, Red5 server, some Java, and Openmeetings - that's the next best platform and bit of software for this type of work). I'd love to do more work on Rebol videoconferencing some day. I think it'd be a killer app... | |
NickA: 12-Dec-2008 | Hi Paul - yes, I've been lurking via html :) Off topic: I dabbled a bit with the Windows API and have a simple working webcam viewer, and also a working remote video client that produces usable video from simple image refreshes. I need to explore the audio api to understand how to capture and pass audio frames across the net - I've got plenty of code from other languages - just need to convert all those api calls to Rebol and see if there are any performance issues, but I suspect that a very simple point-to-point app like that could work in Rebol2. To make it practical for real use, there'd need to be a little server/repeater app to pass data back and forth between clients that are behind routers. Not so crazy difficult, I don't think... |
401 / 3050 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | [5] | 6 | 7 | ... | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |