AltME groups: search
Help · search scripts · search articles · search mailing listresults summary
world | hits |
r4wp | 5907 |
r3wp | 58701 |
total: | 64608 |
results window for this page: [start: 28501 end: 28600]
world-name: r3wp
Group: !AltME ... Discussion about AltME [web-public] | ||
ICarii: 11-Jul-2008 | quite possibly - although i would have a main bar across the top with world/setting options and pane/message related stuff built into the message pane to show a clear linkiing | |
ICarii: 11-Jul-2008 | although from my psychology studies they reckon 7 is a good limit | |
ICarii: 11-Jul-2008 | seeing as i have a little free time i'll go sketch out an 'I wish' Altme interface ;) | |
ICarii: 12-Jul-2008 | wip ;) http://rebol.mustard.co.nz/mockup-v1.pngdone with draw and a little bit of R3 | |
Gregg: 13-Jul-2008 | Just experience the same problem I had in January; the "exists, but not on-line" error. Fortunately, I posted the note here about how to fix it by starting the world from the menu in the app, not with a startup shortcut. | |
ICarii: 14-Jul-2008 | is it logical to group altme users and groups inside the same control as they are different entities and things such as status do not seem to apply equally? I understand that they are treated as 'personal/private' chat groups but the users seem to fill a dual role here. | |
ICarii: 14-Jul-2008 | current user info indicated: 1. is user online 2. when was user last on 3. are there new private messages from a user current group info: 1. are there new messages | |
Graham: 14-Jul-2008 | But it did take a few years for me to get used to the tiny red indication of a new private message | |
ICarii: 14-Jul-2008 | to be honest - im still trying to think of a simple, logical replacement for the mixing.. its a tough one | |
ICarii: 14-Jul-2008 | also - private messages currently do not store a conversation as a unit - but rather as a history - this could be place too look for ideas | |
ICarii: 14-Jul-2008 | ive always seen altme as a merge between email and forums - or IRC with history | |
Pekr: 14-Jul-2008 | Brock - I wonder if following trick would work - imo Altme checks for already running worlds. So - if you know what port you need, you simply open REBOL console and open particular ports. E.g. you know that you world Test was running at 5402, so you can open tcp://:5400, open tcp://:5401, then there is a chance altme would run it on 5402 as needed ... | |
Brock: 14-Jul-2008 | I would think it would work, probably only looking to see if a port is available. | |
Brock: 14-Jul-2008 | I believe if you don't pay for your world to be registered to you that it is not in there records and is prone to being lost. I for one choose 'Risk it' if my world name is closed due to inactivity. My problem has been that I have never had this world inactive for more than a couple of days, yet it is inactivated atleast a couple of times a year. | |
Pekr: 15-Jul-2008 | I don't agree. Why should it be lost? Imo there is a bug somewhere. It seems like in-memory-only database or what? I can understand time-out of the world, if not used for some time. But not loosing world name, when the world is apparently running. That simply can't be regarded being a solid service .... | |
Brock: 15-Jul-2008 | I don't agree either, just stating a fact. It's happened to me fairly regularly but I'm told there isn't a problem. | |
Graham: 17-Jul-2008 | A big bug with Altme is that someone else has to opt you out of a public channel | |
Henrik: 17-Jul-2008 | Then you wouldn't accidentally opt yourself out of a group and not be able to get back in again. | |
Sunanda: 17-Jul-2008 | And an opposite problem exists. Anyone new joining has no way to even know what private groups exist, so they have no way of telling if they should request membership. So if a group has been made private simply so a few current members can opt out of it (it has happened) that has the side-effect of hiding the group from all future members. | |
Graham: 17-Jul-2008 | ICarii will take this information so he can build a better GUI :) | |
Henrik: 17-Jul-2008 | Sunanda, then there should probably be an option to show or hide private groups. I see the advantage for a private world owner to have several private groups he shares with different users. They then can't see eachother's groups, perhaps for business reasons. I used this once to talk to several different customers in the same world (until they appearently grew tired of AltME, sigh). | |
Henrik: 28-Jul-2008 | I think I figured out a problem with my registry.set file. It goes read-only sometimes after an AltME crash, which makes AltME impossible to start. I wonder what causes that. (I think there are multiple different causes why AltME suddenly won't start). | |
Henrik: 5-Aug-2008 | Louis, we had a discussion about Ctrl-X clearing the field a while back for VID3. So far I managed to keep it out and I hope it stays out. :-) Not good usability, IMHO. | |
Graham: 5-Aug-2008 | Control C & V being so close to each other is also a problem me thinks | |
Reichart: 5-Aug-2008 | I think the answer to shortcuts is that it should NOT be part of the application, but rather the OS. That the App should offer a "suggestion" list to the App/ | |
Reichart: 5-Aug-2008 | Thus, you can bring up a standard program on the OS, and simply say AltME/input field "Cut" = Control + X | |
Reichart: 5-Aug-2008 | If apps passed this up to OSes, then a person can bring thier shortcuts to any computer, or any computer connected to the web. | |
Oldes: 6-Aug-2008 | There could be also a way how to redefine shortcuts as it's for example in Total Commander. | |
Graham: 8-Aug-2008 | This looks like a bug. Select a world which is offline .. eg. r2-beta, and after it can't connect, click on "return to world". It quits instead. | |
[unknown: 5]: 11-Aug-2008 | I need to get ALTME working behind a firewall - what ports do I need to allow traffic thru? | |
[unknown: 5]: 16-Aug-2008 | Anyone know a way around the file size limitation in ALTME? i tried to upload a large file and got a message that there was a limitation in this version of ALTME. | |
Pekr: 16-Aug-2008 | There is a prototype AltME version on r3-alpha world, which allows larger uploads ... | |
[unknown: 5]: 16-Aug-2008 | Can I get a link to it as I don't think I have access to R3-alpha world. | |
Gregg: 19-Sep-2008 | Starting from shortcuts? Or has anything changed that could point them to a new working dir? | |
Gregg: 19-Sep-2008 | The upside is that the way AltMe works, the only thing you lose is a little bandwidth for a while. :-) | |
Edgar: 19-Sep-2008 | There was something good about this, I noticed that it also refreshed a few groups that were not refreshing before. Just a few of them. | |
Gregg: 19-Sep-2008 | There you go. A silver lining. :-) | |
Reichart: 20-Sep-2008 | The next time one of you think that you are not seeing updates in group, instead of posting a ".", please try something for me to see if this works. Just change yoru max message setting, say from "100" to "500" or even "1,000". I just noticed something that might explain this bug.... | |
Reichart: 20-Sep-2008 | Cool, but others do, which is why they post a "." Perhaps we can lock in on how to reproduce it. | |
Brock: 23-Oct-2008 | This used to happen to me on a very regular basis when I was running more than one world. Seems to have stabilized for me now though. IIf you are running multiple worlds, you will only be able to get it registered to the proper port if you re-register the world while the other ports are in use.. For example if your world was sitting on the third port that gets assigned, you would need to have your first and second worlds running when you re-register, otherwise it will re-register you to the first port and you'll be hand-cuffed. | |
Pekr: 24-Oct-2008 | One thing is clear - our world was not available, wifi node was down. So at that time, there might be some check, and the rest depends on engine at Safeworlds. It is just that upon the description, the world name should be reserved for 10 days, while it was not even 24 hours. But it was not a problem to renew. We just re-registered the world, and it mapped to the data of our world, without any problem ... | |
Reichart: 24-Oct-2008 | I really don't want to explain "how" things work... nor try to debug any product with customers. However, all information you have about what was happening when you tried to log in is helpful... There is a tendancy for doctors to act as doctors, even when they are the patient. | |
Reichart: 24-Oct-2008 | Yes, it is not a two way street. I appreciate all you have stated... James, there is more being done with AltME... | |
Sunanda: 13-Nov-2008 | Repeat of a post I made here almost a year ago.....And it is still not obvious how a newcomer joins this world. It's a huge blindspot in the otherwise welcoming REBOL community: There is no simple, obvious, method of joining this world.... ....If you discover it via the REBOL.net archive, there is no info at all about joining http://www.rebol.net/altweb/rebol3/ ....If you find it via the REBOL.org archive, there is a note in the Help page about requesting membership via the Mailing List.....So first, you got to join the ML and it has to be working that day :-( Let's come up with something better guys! My opening suggestion.....membership can be requested by sending an email to a specific gmail account that the Admins here monitor. | |
Brock: 13-Nov-2008 | Why not a simple Rebol plugin form that auto-emails the details to the defined admins of this world? Since it's a RT world, they could host? ;-) | |
Sunanda: 14-Nov-2008 | One other possibility......We could have a "request membership" form on REBOL.org. That'd explain the need to download the client from Altme.com. And it'd send an email to an Admin requesting the person be let in. So all we need is an Admin who is willing to be the recipient of that email. Any takers? | |
Geomol: 14-Nov-2008 | How is the world lookup working in detail in AltME. I'm asking, because I have a problem at work, where they run behind a firewall, and they use a ip-range from the outside into the firewall. My guess is, that the AltME client ask the World Name server, where a certain world is located, and the server respond with a IP-number. So when a world is created, the world name is stored at the name server together with the IP number. And the IP number is read in the messages sent over the network. So for me to tell the network manager at work, what ports for what IP numbers to open in the firewall, I could call a site like http://www.myip.dk/ with a browser from the server, where the AltME world is created. And this should be the IP number, for which the ports (5400-5409) should be open for incoming trafic. Is this correct? | |
Brock: 14-Nov-2008 | AltME feature request. Include the date/time as a second column a group was last updated. Since we don't have the ability to synch what was read between each instance of AltME that we read, having the last date/time listed we could quickly select through the groups we have already visited in a previous session on another machine. Although synching what was last accessed would be the ultimate fix. :-) | |
Ammon: 16-Dec-2008 | I currently have AltME configured to show 1000 posts and when I go to the !QM group then I see a serious of posts from user "none" it is clear that this user is actually Reichart and all posts he made to that group prior to 21-Apr-07 4:31 PM show up as being posted as "none" Does anyone else see this? | |
[unknown: 5]: 22-Dec-2008 | A suggestion for handling group termination would be to have an option for a group to be retired and then it goes into like a suspend status where it can't be read but remains listed in a greyed out manner and if someone decides to restore it before the expiration period then it becomes restored. If someone wants to retire it again it goes through the same process. Another thing is to make OPT out groups persistent. | |
[unknown: 5]: 22-Dec-2008 | Correction it CANT be read in a suspend status but remains listed but greyed out. | |
[unknown: 5]: 22-Dec-2008 | Now another thing would be to make OPT outs persistent so that if someone recreates a group with the same name again later that the person is automatically opted out. | |
Reichart: 22-Dec-2008 | Yup... Qtask has a "Hide project" concept like this. The persistent opt out sounds good, but hard to support well. | |
Tomc: 23-Dec-2008 | support inline images , I communicate a bit with some senior citizens who *really* like to send images of everything they are building, if altme could perhaps have inline thumbnails linked to full images stored in the shared folder I could try to move them off email. | |
Steeve: 28-Dec-2008 | i have problems, Altme is trying to load things but is disconnected before it's finished so that it enter in a enternal loop, trying to reload same things each times. | |
Steeve: 28-Dec-2008 | i wonder why disconnections discard all changes. Missing some atomicity in updates here. If the whole loaded things is not commited at once then it's trying to redo again and again. what a mess... | |
Steeve: 28-Dec-2008 | it's not the first time people described this syndrom. Saying it never happened before so it doesn't come from Altme, he's a special way to resolve (or not) bugs. | |
Henrik: 29-Dec-2008 | he didn't say either. it's a mis-quote, or so he says himself. | |
[unknown: 5]: 29-Dec-2008 | I was just looking it up and it looks like at the least Pekr was correct that it was a reference to 640KB or RAM whether a misquote or not. ;-) | |
Sunanda: 1-Jan-2009 | For those who like stats: 110 different people made just over 35,000 posts on this world in 2008. That's nearly five meg of raw text communication. Is that growth or shrinkage? Well, for 2007, we also had 110 active posters, and they made nearly 45,000 posts. So that's shrinkage in volume, and no growth in population. Other worlds (which have specialised in R3 development and testing) have more than taken up the slack in volumes. I don't have numbers for all of them, because I am not a member of them all. | |
Sunanda: 1-Jan-2009 | Small print: I can only count the posts I can see. The totals include the private groups which I am a member, but not those for which I am not. The totals do not count any private messaging between myself and other world members. | |
Claude: 14-Jan-2009 | ask for a account for r3-alpha thanks | |
amacleod: 19-Jan-2009 | I tried and got a "server is already running" message. | |
amacleod: 19-Jan-2009 | I got it to work on a different port. On windows you do not seem to need to declare the port like on linux. Windows opens multiple worlds from the gui | |
Brock: 19-Jan-2009 | Just beware, if you open the worlds in a different order, they will use the first available port, so for example if the first world you created isn't running, and you start the second world you created, the second world will look for the first port, however, the world server knows it should have been assigned to the second port. (excuse me not using the port numbers to avoid confusion, but I couldn't recall if the first port was 5000, or 5500). If the server isn't using the port is was created on, it won't be recognized by the world server. | |
amacleod: 20-Jan-2009 | I going to be serving on a linux box and it seems you can just assign the port at start up. altme -s "world name" -p 5401 | |
amacleod: 20-Jan-2009 | Now trying to autostart at boot time but having a trouble... su -lc '/.../altserve -s world -p port &' user > /dev/null according ot altme guide does not seem to launching... I know the example is for altmeserve but I thought it would work for client as well | |
Brock: 20-Jan-2009 | sorry, my issue was with re-creating a world. I had multiple worlds hosted on the same machine at one time and I cheaped out and didn't register the world for $10 US per world. When the worlds expired after 10 days of no usage (which never happened, but they expried anyway), I had to recreate the worlds, the order was important in that scenario. Sorry for misleading you. | |
amacleod: 21-Jan-2009 | Is there a known problem changing server types for a world going from a linux box to a windows box? I moved a world from linux to windows and I'm getting this error: AltME Error: Registry: cannot load dataset files: 2 | |
Graham: 22-Jan-2009 | Graham needs a prize for being AltME's top public poster since AltME REBOL world has been in existence! See http://www.rebol.org/aga-display-stats.r?world=r3wp&year=2005 thru to year 2008! | |
Sunanda: 22-Jan-2009 | Nice going! -- though you are off to a slow start for 2009: not yet on the Prolific posters leader board: http://www.rebol.org/aga-display-stats.r?world=r3wp&year=2009 | |
Graham: 22-Jan-2009 | Graham thought he would adopt a new years resolution, create an online persona that is nice to qtask and altme. | |
Graham: 22-Jan-2009 | is it just me, or my persona, that has found Altme inaccessible a few times today ? | |
Reichart: 22-Jan-2009 | Possible, if you think it happened, it is as good as having happened. But one could also say.... - A router went down - Bandwidth was limited between NZ and the world. - The software gremlins don't like you, or you, or the other you. | |
amacleod: 29-Jan-2009 | IS ther a way to change the permissions to a shared file/folder after its been uploaded. I set it up for 'myself' not realizing it would not be available on other computeres I signed onto. I should have made it abvailable to my user name I guess. | |
amacleod: 1-Feb-2009 | I've been using Altme for a project with a guy who is very non-tech. He did not know how to drag a window. Anyway, it is working out great. We are using File sharing to re-format a bunch of text files and with the abilty to add comments and check lists its saving a lot of time over traditional Email. He is still not really up to speed so once he is it wil really shine. And with the abiltty to just add new members where they can read any old messages to see where we are and what we have been doing. I regret not using it for my Appraisal business. My partner and I had to email files back and forth all the time. And sometimes we needed to get files from one another but one of us was away or not at our computer. If we used Altme we would never have had that problem. | |
Reichart: 2-Feb-2009 | That is one example Gregg. But even in regards manual controls. As best as I can tell the only system I perceive as working is a benevolent human dictator or benevolent fascist group (moderators). And most people won't even notice them, a few people will notice them and appreciate them, and a very small group of people will dispraise them and it could become violent if pulled into the real world. And that models the whole thing for me : ) In this world (unrelated to AltME), we have mostly taken the position that we can work most things out, or push/pull people into other group. It is not 100%, but as I'm fond of saying, nothing is. I little patience, tolerance, ignoring, what ever you want to call it, goes a long way everywhere... | |
Graham: 2-Feb-2009 | but altme lacks a way of allowing the community to censure a recidivist | |
Graham: 2-Feb-2009 | how about this ... each person has a starting level of karma/reputation or whatever. As they post, others rate their posts and add to their karma. | |
Graham: 2-Feb-2009 | Now anyone can use their karma to subtract from someone's karma ... so if you feel someone is out of line, you can take points from them, but you also lose the same amount of points. If anyone loses too many points in a day or week or whatever, they are not allowed to post for a time period. | |
Dockimbel: 2-Feb-2009 | Beer pressure works. You made a typo. | |
Reichart: 2-Feb-2009 | Beer pressure does work.... that is how I ask contractors to do things. I call them over, and as I ask them to make changes, I pull out the ice from the bag, pull all the beer out of the boxes, and put it all in the cooler. But the time I'm done talking it is all set up, and by the time they are done working, the beer is ice cold! Graham, yes, great idea. This is a model we have used in game rooms. It would be interesting in this context to see how people help each other. I suspect it "might" be a zero sum game. There are people that regardless of the facts simply help the underdog. It is why so many hard criminals attract women from the outside. I have not seen anything like this though in Qtask. I think the fact that you upload your picture makes you a little more "accountable", and that a moderator can kick you out. Slashdot's system works pretty well, it might be fun to play with that more too. | |
Dockimbel: 2-Feb-2009 | Indubitably, beer makes a great tool for a modern man. :-) | |
Reichart: 2-Feb-2009 | Right, that would be a drinking game : ) | |
[unknown: 5]: 3-Feb-2009 | Oh a change of heart - good to hear. | |
[unknown: 5]: 3-Feb-2009 | Wow, just looked and my account here was created in November 21 2002, Can't believe it has been that long. Looks like a lot of us have been around here that long. | |
DideC: 4-Feb-2009 | Rebolish : humor ! With a "rebolcentral.org" domain name, I was surprised to fall on this "Jesus walk on water" page. Maybe "Rebol walk on the IT water" ?? | |
sqlab: 4-Feb-2009 | Looks more like done by someone, who can not let pass up any chance to grab a dime from a fool.( | |
Reichart: 4-Feb-2009 | Many donate, but that is besides the point. I own a lot of domain names, and many we simply forward to "somewhere". Personal stuff I tend to forward to JWOW. The big question is, do we keep this domain. I will release if no one wants to use it. Otherwise I will pay to keep it and donate it to anyone here who has a good use for it (and WILL use it). | |
Graham: 4-Feb-2009 | It was intended for a user based REBOL site for teaching etc from my recollection ... | |
Reichart: 5-Feb-2009 | It was intended to be a single place that would simply list all known REBOL resources. | |
Gabriele: 5-Feb-2009 | a single place with all rebol resources does not explain why it's called "rebolcentral"? | |
Graham: 5-Feb-2009 | What exactly is rebolcentral? A regular hosted account? Or do you have shell access and can run daemons etc? | |
Reichart: 5-Feb-2009 | Right now it is a name. | |
sqlab: 5-Feb-2009 | JesusWalksOnWater.com does not sound like a name for a central rebol repository. Maybe I do not get the joke. | |
Maarten: 5-Feb-2009 | I think RebolCentral is a great domain name to point to a centrally hosted open source repository | |
Graham: 5-Feb-2009 | Anton, there is no content on rebolcentral.org ... so Reichart just forwards it to jesuswalks as a joke. | |
[unknown: 5]: 5-Feb-2009 | Nothing new or original. Not a joke either - he uses the link for defamation. | |
Reichart: 5-Feb-2009 | Graham, not a joke, simply a process. To call it a joke implies forethought | |
Reichart: 5-Feb-2009 | Graham, not a joke. It is simply grouped by process. A joke would imply there was forethought, then it could be a good or bad joke. Since it is not a joke in the first place, it can't be good, or bad. But, sure am glad that the real question on the table, the name itself, is being skipped here...would hate for anyone to actually address something of substance, but hey, look a shiny object LOL |
28501 / 64608 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ... | 284 | 285 | [286] | 287 | 288 | ... | 643 | 644 | 645 | 646 | 647 |