AltME groups: search
Help · search scripts · search articles · search mailing listresults summary
world | hits |
r4wp | 4382 |
r3wp | 44224 |
total: | 48606 |
results window for this page: [start: 12001 end: 12100]
world-name: r3wp
Group: Make-doc ... moving forward [web-public] | ||
eFishAnt: 29-Jan-2005 | distinguishing between [] and () in a writer's mind seems very logical. | |
eFishAnt: 29-Jan-2005 | Lists in English are now: Item 1, Item 2, and Item 3. | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | MDP and MD2 are to far on rendering method to be correctly handle in a single app ... | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | and has you notice it (cause you are very clever) both format have no format heading in files like =MDP or =MD2 at the very begining of the .txt file witch countains the | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | has the flag are the same how user can make the difference betwin one and other ... | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | making 2 rendering engine will encrease and complicate the application for very not a good result ... | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | I prefer a dedicate mode but MD2IDE and MDP-GUI can enritch them eatch other ;) | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | GRaham =url or =image or /table \table are not formated the same way in MDP and MD2 ;) | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | MDP formated tables just crash MD2 engine and vis et versa | |
Graham: 29-Jan-2005 | if you modularise the parser and rendering engine, then you can add in Geomol's version as well :) | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | so it's better to have to product each of them comply with a spécific task and avoid user crankles | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | Graham I could add Excel and Word too but that's not the main actual purpose IMO | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | sources are freely downloadable and modificatable If your challenge is to merge them why not | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | but the resulting app will be very bogus , veryheavy and very slow .... | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | MDP is a more sofisticate way to process and for example with section rendering I still have some counting problem on next refresh | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | NicomDoc has things from MD2 and things from MDP + things really new | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | but colored text in VID there I said NO, NO, NO, NO, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO !!!! IMG parsys this kind of heavy flaged an recompose it to VID it's a hudge task and very process consumist | |
Graham: 29-Jan-2005 | I guess one could choose to ignore the colouring and just pass it through | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | but once again in the very futur things like that could be added with full perf and until this time we train our selves on simpliest format (simpliest for the VID statement at least) | |
Graham: 29-Jan-2005 | I wonder what the proportion of users are for mdp and md2 | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | so I can say that each of them have is own duty asigned MD2 to release quick and not very very sofisticated text MDP for articles with more sophistication in it ... | |
shadwolf: 29-Jan-2005 | NicomDoc is a step over this two that's sure but it's heavyly using html capabilities and adapting this to VID HUM HUM HUM | |
shadwolf: 30-Jan-2005 | GRaham note that I don't say I'm not interrested on making NicomDoc quick and easy editor but this format has too a lot of things to make a VID parse writer mad hehehehe or maybe I'm not enought skilled ... | |
Sunanda: 30-Jan-2005 | Its good to have competing mark-up languages ... they can all gain by learning from the strengths of the others. HTML and VID are such different concepts that you can't easily start from a single "higher" dialect and make full use of both VID and HTML MakeDocX {x=2 or Pro or blank) gives you very little comtrol over the emitted HTML -- so it is less powerful but more generic....hence thoughts of PDF and other emitters. NicomDoc is more powerful as a HTML generator but, as shadwolf says, not nearly so easy to VID....Though let's give it time to develop: it's only days old. Mulch (my dialect) gives you total control over the HTML and CSS with almost zero chance of a VID version being possible..... http://www.rebol.org/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/rebol/boiler.r?display=mulch-help | |
Pekr: 30-Jan-2005 | Color Text (Rich Text). One week ago I talked to Carl here about various topics and reminded him of rich text, he said it is important, so I put together few notes we produced in the past and he noted that he has something slightly different in mind and that he may say publicly something to it, so let's hope he will do so ... | |
shadwolf: 30-Jan-2005 | in actual way we have to parse the MDX(retake of sunanda notation see up) file then create a page with will content style and data to so in this operating way making complicate conposing like a heavy colored text or a content linked table of content (=toc) will include a new parsing statement in the parsing statement this will increase a slow rendering process | |
shadwolf: 31-Jan-2005 | MDP-GUI v1.3.4 include a remade IHM a bug correction and the rendering of the list of content | |
shadwolf: 31-Jan-2005 | and this helps you to see what direction the MDP-GUI project is taking I hope this 1.3.4 version will be at your taste. :) | |
James: 31-Jan-2005 | Okay, I downloaded makedoc2 from rebol.org the other day and I still haven't figured out how to create links. In makedoc all you did was "url=http://www.rebol.com"REBOL" " but that just shows up as text in makedoc2. Could you help me out? | |
James: 31-Jan-2005 | So, I could just edit the HTML file and add it afterwards? | |
Geomol: 2-Feb-2005 | I'm going on skivacation for a week, but I desided to put my work so far on the NicomDoc document format up on my website. It's NOT version 1.0 yet, so some features are not supported. I'll write a short specification in a moment. Parsing a NicomDoc document to HTML goes in two passes, first the raw document is converted to RebXML format. This is done by this script: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/nicomdoc.r Next the RebXML version is converted to HTML. This is done with this script: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/rebxml2html.r I've also made a little script, that will do the whole conversion in one go by calling the other scripts. It works much like calling makedoc2.r, and it can be found here: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/ndoc.r Those of you, who want to work with this format, e.g. make VID output, should work from the RebXML version of the document (after first parsing from raw document to RebXML with the first script), because this script handle all the complicated rules, so the RebXML version is much easier to work with. | |
Geomol: 2-Feb-2005 | Specification here: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/NicomDoc.html Example of use: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/example.txt And the output: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/example.html | |
Geomol: 2-Feb-2005 | Notice! As this is not version 1.0 of NicomDoc, some things will probably change. The namespace might change. Example: I use 'p' for paragraph in the RebXML version to make it short (also if someone wants to make XML output, which is bloated), but I might change it to have a more saying name for a paragraph. And URL keyword might go away and be replaced by a more general term like a reference. | |
Geomol: 2-Feb-2005 | It's of course possible to make XML output of a NicomDoc document by first parsing it with nicomdoc.r and then use http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/rebxml/rebxml2xml.r on the RebXML version. And back again with http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/rebxml/xml2rebxml.r | |
shadwolf: 5-Feb-2005 | and wiki rendering like to ... it's closer from IRC or chat or web php/forum it include Smyleys ;) | |
Henrik: 13-Feb-2005 | has there been any ways suggested with making colspans in tables? otherwise I would suggest a: \colspan col1 col2 col3 /colspan tag. Just build the table as normally and enclose the columns you want in a specific row with those tags. | |
Geomol: 13-Feb-2005 | It's tricky to make tables easy to produce for the writer, and at the same time give opportunities to have colspan and rowspan. And do we have the need to have tables within tables? That'll just make it even more complicated. I guess, learning by doing is a good way to figure it out. (That's one idea behind my NicomDoc format. To try things out.) | |
shadwolf: 23-Feb-2005 | what's new : - Better rendering images and tables support. Try to load the default make-doc-pro.txt that come with Make-Doc-Pro | |
shadwolf: 27-Feb-2005 | [MDP-GUI DEV NEWS ] I improved the rendering speed by 300% integrating the MDViewer rendering method that ASHLEY created. That new algorithm really rocks !!! I had to change the inline formating flags to conserv the most speed. I conserv the ashley way to deal with inline marcker has HTML tags (e.g: <b>text bold</b>) I adapt ashley's code for all little other différences that exist beetwin MD2 and MDP format. Next step is to enhance the toc rendering process. I remade the first start up process. I plan to give MDP-GUI.r, make-doc.r, make-doc.txt, ms-word.gif, in a single ZIP archive that make easier the release and use. As johnatemps says to me people wants to download and use and not try to configure the program durring lot of time. | |
shadwolf: 27-Feb-2005 | maybe later i will wrap all the zip package into a .exe file using grebox wrapper from shadwolf and spag' :) | |
Geomol: 2-Mar-2005 | New version of NicomDoc is out. It's still not v.1.0, so things will change. Specification: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/NicomDoc.html Example: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/example.html Example source: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/example.txt Main script (this is the one, you should run. Works like makedoc2.r.): http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/ndoc.r NicomDoc to RebXML script: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/nicomdoc.r RebXML to HTML 4.01 script: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/nicomdoc/ndrebxml2html.r Changes from previous version are: simpler tables, better magic mode (rich text), better handling of paragraph states like centered text (won't effect the inner of e.g. tables), better handling of faulty input, tables within tables, same with notes (not sure, if you could that in previous version) ... and probably some more, I can't remember. You need atleast REBOL/Core 2.5.3, because of new break word within parse rules. So it won't work with official REBOL/View 1.2. Get a newer one! | |
Henrik: 14-Mar-2005 | A couple of issues with makedoc2: 1. Table headers are double height and the text in the last column is pushed half a line down in Gecko based browsers 2. \note ... /note boxes are wider than the document itself in Gecko based browsers I haven't seen them in RAMBO, but is a fix being done by anyone? | |
Robert: 16-Mar-2005 | Just a note, I'm getting some free time in the next week and will work on MDP. I already have fixed some bugs and will make it more MD2 compatible. Further the interface between parser and generator will become MD2 compatible so that things like MDP-GUI / MDViewer can swap the engine beyond. | |
Robert: 24-Mar-2005 | So, I have made some enhancements to MDP and put a beta online. You can find it at: http://www.robertmuench.de/download/make-doc-pro.r The following changes have been made: *Bugs fixed:* #State tracking flags weren't correct, could lead to strange results when using tables where cell text used inline markup. Especially in site-mode. *New Features:* #Code can now be included via ~=include code <filename>~ where the included code will be automatically indented and hence handled like an example by the output format emitter. *Programmatic changes:* #Celeaned up the global word pollution (Thanks to Ahsley Truter) #Renamed ~generate-files~ function to ~scan-doc~ to meet MD2 wording | |
shadwolf: 29-Mar-2005 | well in fact the script countains lots of different files and handle them one by one it a true torture | |
Group: AltWeb ... AltME Web Mirror [web-public] | ||
Carl: 9-Jul-2005 | Created this group for comments and suggestions regarding the web mirror for this AltME world. | |
Chris: 9-Jul-2005 | Ok, missed this group -- Carl, just a thought (and see what others think) -- it's a little odd looking at the messages with newest on top. Another suggestion would be to do newest at bottom and put an anchor at the end so that incoming links start reading the page at the bottom to mirror the AltME view... | |
Gabriele: 10-Jul-2005 | that's very unlikely to happen. sorry olivier, but you can use the ml and we can relay messages here when needed. someday (hopefully soon) we'll have a communication forum that is reachable by everyone. | |
Graham: 15-Jul-2005 | all you need to do is insert <br> as you parse each conversation and limit each line to some reasonable length | |
Group: Postscript ... Emitting Postscript from REBOL [web-public] | ||
Geomol: 7-Apr-2006 | I do: write %test.ps postscript [page [path [linewidth 10 at 72x72 box 72 72]]] and then open test.ps with Finder. | |
Geomol: 7-Apr-2006 | I guess, linewidth mean nothing in that example and can be left out. Sorry about that! | |
Graham: 7-Apr-2006 | PostScript normally uses units of "points" for placing graphics on the page. I find it more convenient to work with centimeters. I got the following snippet of PostScript code from a public domain program called "GLE" which I believe is available at any large ftp site; I recommend this graphics program. By examining the PostScript output of that program I collected the following piece of PostScript code: matrix currentmatrix /originmat exch def /umatrix {originmat matrix concatmatrix setmatrix} def [28.3465 0 0 28.3465 10.5 100.0] umatrix What this basically does is rescale the page so that now all following commands will work as if the centimeter is the basic unit of length. This places (0,0) near the bottom left of the page and (21,24) near the top right of the page. If you don't do this, then (0,0) is the bottom left corner of the page and (612,792) is the top right corner of the page (if you are using an 8 1/2 inch by 11 inch sheet of paper). These are the default PostScript units; 72 of these to an inch. 28.3465 to a centimeter, thus the numbers above in the last line of PostScript code. | |
Geomol: 7-Apr-2006 | AT can both be specified as a pair and 2 numbers. | |
Henrik: 7-Apr-2006 | so both "at 3x3" and "at 3 3" can be used? | |
Geomol: 7-Apr-2006 | just a basic one with text and some graphics. | |
[unknown: 9]: 7-Apr-2006 | how about pulling a "NeXT" and making a PS VID? : ) | |
[unknown: 9]: 7-Apr-2006 | Gabriele is writing a PDF emitter for MakeDoc and QML. | |
Henrik: 7-Apr-2006 | geomol, and BSD license | |
Louis: 8-Apr-2006 | Henrik, are you going to develope your ean13.r any further so that everything is there and saves to a file? http://www.isbn-international.org/en/download/implementation-guidelines-04.pdf | |
Henrik: 8-Apr-2006 | louis, the one on rebol.org seems to be a bit old. the one I have locally can generate bitmaps as image! in 1x, 2x, 4x and 8x size and vectors for PDF Maker. it can generate an EAN13 code with the correct checksum. it doesn't save to file, but it's only a couple of lines of code to do that | |
Geomol: 8-Apr-2006 | It seems, that Times has to be named "Times-Roman". Here on my Mac, I have "Times" and "Times New Roman" installed, so I'm a bit confused. | |
Geomol: 8-Apr-2006 | It's possible to use all different kinds of fonts. On my Mac, I have e.g. Papyrus, and combining fontnames with -Bold, -Italic and -BoldItalic is ok. | |
[unknown: 9]: 8-Apr-2006 | Yeah, in QML we ran into the same font problem. So what we did was make Times, Helv, and Courier forced to be the defaults, then allowed any font name to be called as bassed to a variable as the real name of the font. On windows you can have font names with spaces "Times New Roman" for example. By have the top three just be one simple word everyone can remember I figured it would make people happy. | |
[unknown: 9]: 8-Apr-2006 | Also, let me confirm something, can I take any existiing PS file, and simply pass it to this, and it will render it? | |
Geomol: 8-Apr-2006 | And now I'm at it, learning a bit PS and all, it'll make sense for me to make PS output from my NicomDoc format. | |
Geomol: 8-Apr-2006 | Reichart, the thing, you're asking, is taking a PS-file as input and render it, like GhostView does. It'll take a bit more work to parse PS-files, but it's not impossible. I have no intension doing that for now though. | |
[unknown: 9]: 8-Apr-2006 | Henrik, thanks, I will play with it. I have this great Mac sitting on my desk, but I don't seem to use it enough. NOTE: I'm still tied to my PC, and TRYING to get away....so far it seems I'm held to just a couple of issues....I have not had time to write up the "PC MAC LINUX" chart I want so I can figure out what it takes for me to move over. But the first big one is still a thumbnailer. I use ThumbPlus. If they were on Mac and Linux, then I think the move would be a lot better. I use this about 10 times every day. We can move this chat if you want to engage me on the Mac issue. | |
Graham: 9-Apr-2006 | John, just reading that link you gave to a postscript document structure, and I think we should change the prolog to say %! instead of %!PS-Adobe-3.0 as the latter says that the document is fully conforming. | |
Graham: 9-Apr-2006 | The prolog is quite important to allow document managers to manage the postscript file properly. It was interesting to note that postscript file managers can pull out the colour graphic pages and send them to be printed on colour lasers, and let the rest be printed on the monochrome lasers. | |
Graham: 9-Apr-2006 | the point of writing conforming postscript is that a manager might take that document and print it 2 or 4 up or whatever. | |
Graham: 10-Apr-2006 | I think the most common scenario for those of us wanting to do printing is to to compose a page, preview it and then print it. This way, we have the one dialect that covers both bases. | |
[unknown: 9]: 10-Apr-2006 | Oh, agreed....................my thought was simply how many dialects we are all working with, and how this number will grow until there is need for a new approach. For example, XML is a dialect of sorts, for transmitting discrete data. PS for rendering information in 2D. HTML for rendering information in such a way that those that are challenged can us verbal readers, or physically challenged can ID links and important parts. MakeDoc for converting few symbols to complex rendering instructions that can be represented by HTML. | |
Gabriele: 10-Apr-2006 | Reichart, don't confuse language with dialect. PS and HTML are languages, not dialects (you can say that HTML is a dialect of SGML, to some extent). | |
Gabriele: 10-Apr-2006 | i.e. there is no common ground between PS and HTML and so on. | |
Geomol: 10-Apr-2006 | I guess, the number of dialects is defined from the number of problem-domains. I think of them as the sub-languages different professions have. Doctors use their words, car-mechanics theirs, programmers yet other words and terms. So there might not be a limit for dialects, like there might not be a limit for new professions. | |
Geomol: 10-Apr-2006 | I think, it was Gregg, who pointed it out at last DevCon: Define a dialect, and you've solved the problem. Once you've defined the perfect dialect to solve some problem, the problem-solving code (programmed in the dialect) might just be 10 lines. | |
Geomol: 13-Apr-2006 | New version of postscript.r uploaded! I've add the prolog %! and epilog %%EOF as Graham suggested. I also wrapped paths in the postscripts commands gsave and grestore, so transformations give less trouble. Try this: do http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/postscript/postscript.r write %test.ps postscript load http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/postscript/test.txt You now have a postscript file "test.ps" produced by the dialect. It's content looks like this: http://home.tiscali.dk/john.niclasen/postscript/test.png To see, how using the dialect look in use, see the "test.txt" file. | |
Henrik: 13-Apr-2006 | now I'm imagining: this is really lowlevel stuff, but I think it would be neat to build standardized higher level primitives. a barcode is such a primitive. barcharts, 3D views and complex symbols could be other types of primitives. just brainstorming... | |
Geomol: 13-Apr-2006 | Yes, good ideas! It's not the meaning, that people should write in the postscript dialect directly. Building higher level dialects and primitives/applications on top of the dialect is the way to go. | |
Henrik: 13-Apr-2006 | that's true... maybe it would be better to approach it through DRAW and let postscript.r do the dirty work | |
Geomol: 13-Apr-2006 | Developer libraries and standards are good! It's been a big part of my job the last 15 years or so making programming libraries for developers. If I could make money developing REBOL standards and programming libraries, I would use more time on it. | |
Maxim: 13-Apr-2006 | and slim. | |
Maxim: 13-Apr-2006 | and steel. | |
Geomol: 13-Apr-2006 | and clipping ... argh, tough one, me thinks. | |
Geomol: 13-Apr-2006 | and matrix | |
Geomol: 13-Apr-2006 | And Gouraud shaded triangle (if anyone uses those). | |
Graham: 13-Apr-2006 | test: form ps [ font Times-Roman 40 linewidth 0 at 72x720 "REBOL PostScript Dialect" at 72x716 line 520x716 font Times-Roman 16 at 96x680 "With this dialect it's possible to easily produce PostScript output." font Courier 24 at 96x600 "You can use different fonts." font Times-Roman 16 gsave at 120x550 rotate -30 "Make" grestore gsave at 160x450 rotate 30 scale 2 4 "transformations" grestore at 96x400 "And do graphics:" at 100x320 box 200x40 stroke gsave at 180x240 rotate 20 setgray .6 box 100x80 fill grestore at 150x250 line 200x290 180x305 194x340 font Helvetica-Oblique 12 at 72x72 "Postscript is copyright Adobe." ] | |
Geomol: 13-Apr-2006 | Good work! And a very fine alternative. This is the time to deside, how the dialect should be formed. Situation is, I had no experience with PostScript before starting this dialect, so I have no feeling about, how the dialect should look. If only there were an SGML definition for PostScript, but the closest we come to some rules is the DSC (Document Structure Conventions). | |
Graham: 13-Apr-2006 | As long as we can satisfy out aims of text on paper, and some graphics ... | |
Geomol: 13-Apr-2006 | We need information about, what can be inside one path, and how they are used in other PS files. | |
Geomol: 13-Apr-2006 | In my lates PS output, there is also a problem, where the box and the filled box is made. The box ends with a closepath and a stroke, but there is no newpath to start the next. I think, that's not 100% correct, but it seems to work. | |
Graham: 13-Apr-2006 | presumably, stroke, fill, and show close the existing path. | |
Geomol: 13-Apr-2006 | A good dialect is one with some simple rules, and where it's difficult to produce something wrong. | |
Geomol: 13-Apr-2006 | I'm too tired now and am going to bed. Good night! | |
Henrik: 13-Apr-2006 | no, the barcode is already working fine. it's the position of the image on the paper and general arrangement of the code that needs to be worked out | |
Graham: 13-Apr-2006 | Thinking of what John said, I suspect if you try and automate the newpath etc, you'll get into problems. | |
Graham: 13-Apr-2006 | at least we gain by .. losing the rpn notation, and also using pairs instead of two numbers. | |
Henrik: 13-Apr-2006 | actually only the text was harder because in PS you point to a position and start writing, where you in PDF-maker need to define a text box before writing | |
Henrik: 13-Apr-2006 | works fine with barcode readers. have tested with both cheap and expensive ones. just need a good printer | |
Graham: 13-Apr-2006 | and produces this postscript output |
12001 / 48606 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ... | 119 | 120 | [121] | 122 | 123 | ... | 483 | 484 | 485 | 486 | 487 |