• Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r4wp

[!REBOL3] General discussion about REBOL 3

Gregg
21-Jan-2013
[871]
Thanks for posting that Ladislav! Keep up the good work.
GrahamC
21-Jan-2013
[872x2]
https://github.com/gchiu/Rebol3/blob/master/protocols/prot-send.r
and with the latest prot-smtp.r can now send attachments .. I tried 
a 60Mb one and it went fine.


same syntax as in R2

send/attach [carl-:-rebol-:-com] "Carl, need to remove the spam from blog 
comments" %attachment.exe
Lost text = I send a 60Mb avi as an attachment which went through
Oldes
23-Jan-2013
[874x2]
Graham, I'm really not sure it's good idea to show these commands 
on web-public forum. Why don't you use your email in such a cases?
Regarding binary not a string - string is unicode which may differ 
per platforms.
GrahamC
23-Jan-2013
[876]
Oldes, I believe emails are scrubbed by the script that uploads these 
feeds to the rebol.org site
Bo
23-Jan-2013
[877]
And [carl-:-rebol-:-com] is not Carl's email address any longer. :-)
Arnold
23-Jan-2013
[878]
? He owns the domain rebol.com doesn't he? So he gets all emailaddresses 
with that domain. Unless he assigns someone else one of those emailaddresses 
it is his. So he might not be using it anymore or somebody else is 
using it now?
Bo
23-Jan-2013
[879]
All emails to [carl-:-rebol-:-com] get redirected to null. :-)
Arnold
23-Jan-2013
[880]
Sometimes those seem like the same thing yes indeed :-)
GrahamC
23-Jan-2013
[881]
I know what Carl uses as his email and yes, I knew it wasn't what 
I wrote above.  Last time I looked he had an s at the end of this 
name.
Arnold
23-Jan-2013
[882]
correct
Gregg
23-Jan-2013
[883]
Now he'll have to change it again, as this is web public. ;-)
GrahamC
23-Jan-2013
[884]
Nah, this is to prevent harvesting of email by bots
Arnold
23-Jan-2013
[885]
that is one of my objection in making all these groups web-public.
GrahamC
23-Jan-2013
[886]
If they weren't web public, we wouldn't be here
Sunanda
23-Jan-2013
[887]
email addresses in posts are munged on the rebol.org archive .....so 
they should be safe from bots.
GrahamC
23-Jan-2013
[888]
Is there a document anywhere that outlines the differences between 
R2 and R3 for those porting/writing apps now?  I'm thinking that 
those of us still using R2 should try and stick to something that 
will be compatible with R3.
MaxV
24-Jan-2013
[889]
The email of Carl is  [open-:-rebol-:-com]
Ladislav
24-Jan-2013
[890]
This is a public group, MaxV! I assume that your action will force 
Carl to change his address and not give it to you...
MaxV
24-Jan-2013
[891x2]
Hey! Carl published the email on his blog!
Were you serious?
Ladislav
24-Jan-2013
[893]
I do not know, but Carl was quite shy of publishing is mail address
MaxV
24-Jan-2013
[894]
Well, it isn't a personal email, is the email of the opensource rebol 
that he published, so he can ignore that email adress as he wish...
Ladislav
24-Jan-2013
[895]
Which is what we ceratainly do not want. Please use some reason before 
publishing that may be perceived as private especially if it is not 
your private data.
BrianH
24-Jan-2013
[896]
Regardless if email addresses are munged in the rebol.org archives, 
don't post real email addresses in a web-public group unless you 
are attempting to test spam filters.
Maxim
24-Jan-2013
[897]
I agree with everyone, but the given address by MaxV is a *very* 
public mail address, so its not that big a deal IMHO.
BrianH
24-Jan-2013
[898]
Just good policy :)
Scot
24-Jan-2013
[899]
As a matter of practice I generally share contact information for 
other people ONLY through individual private channels and NEVER on 
email.  Just a thought.
GrahamC
24-Jan-2013
[900x2]
Has anyone had any contact with Steven Solie about the Amiga R3 build? 
 I see from his site http://solie.ca/that in 2010/11/23 he had R3-GUI 
up and running.
AFAIK, that's the only other platform where view was ported to so 
far
Ladislav
27-Jan-2013
[902]
This looks like a question best suited for BrianH:


http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14420942/how-are-words-bound-within-a-rebol-module
BrianH
27-Jan-2013
[903x3]
Answered. Someone might want to adapt that answer for use in the 
docs.
Since he didn't ask about exporting and the 'private option, I didn't 
mention such issues.
I guess that since I never had a stack overflow account before, my 
previous answers don't count towards my stats.
Sunanda
27-Jan-2013
[906]
I believe you can email the stackoverflow admins, Brian, and they 
can transfer stats to your new account.
BrianH
27-Jan-2013
[907]
I have no idea whether my old answers has associated email addresses. 
I suppose it doesn't matter.
GrahamC
27-Jan-2013
[908x2]
What old answers if you don't have a SO account before?
For completeness I've asked the question about exporting and private
BrianH
27-Jan-2013
[910]
SO didn't previously require you to create an account or even provide 
an email address to answer questions. Since I didn't care about SO, 
I didn't bother to make an account. Now they require an email address, 
and use that email address to determine who you are. Creating an 
account is almost an extra, just a way to give you a nickname and 
profile info.
GrahamC
27-Jan-2013
[911x3]
You need a reputation of at least 20 to use the SO chat system ... 
and with ticks, you're already there.
with 2 ticks
BTW, we are encouraging the use of SO as a help resource for those 
who won't or can't use Altme
BrianH
27-Jan-2013
[914x2]
Yeah, I found that annoying, but I suppose it makes sense.
Do you want me to edit my answer to include the exporting stuff? 
I can't really do it in a comment since it would be in the same scale 
as the original answer.
GrahamC
27-Jan-2013
[916]
Edit the answer would be better
Andreas
27-Jan-2013
[917]
Or ask a separate question.
GrahamC
27-Jan-2013
[918]
Also, SO has an API so we can potentially grab all the Rebol tagged 
questions and also host them on rebol.org if we need to.  It's not 
stuck in the SO system
BrianH
27-Jan-2013
[919x2]
Too late, Andreas, I'm already editing the answer. It makes it easier 
to keep context this way.
Done.