World: r4wp
[!REBOL3] General discussion about REBOL 3
older newer | first last |
Ladislav 16-Dec-2012 [41] | test-failures 55? Are those the rounding issues? |
Andreas 16-Dec-2012 [42] | Yes. |
Ladislav 16-Dec-2012 [43] | Why don't I experience the problem? |
Andreas 16-Dec-2012 [44x2] | Older GCC, maybe? |
Let me try building with an older GCC to see if that changes anything. | |
Ladislav 16-Dec-2012 [46] | how do I check the gcc version? |
Andreas 16-Dec-2012 [47] | gcc -v |
Ladislav 16-Dec-2012 [48x2] | gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) |
...and glibc version? | |
Kaj 16-Dec-2012 [50] | Look in the package manager |
Andreas 16-Dec-2012 [51] | apt-cache show libc6 | grep Version |
Ladislav 16-Dec-2012 [52x3] | [ladislav-:-lkub64]:/r3/make$ apt-cache show libc6 | grep Version Version: 2.15-0ubuntu10.3 Version: 2.15-0ubuntu10.2 Version: 2.15-0ubuntu10 |
Andreas, it looks like you have a new test as well? | |
(Total 4344) | |
Andreas 16-Dec-2012 [55x3] | I found the "total" number to be not particularly reliable. |
GCC 4.3.2 compiled binary doesn't have the round regressions: 16-Dec-2012/23:42:06+1:00 2.101.0.4.2 Total: 4333 Succeeded: 3950 Test failures: 53 Crashes: 11 Dialect failures: 0 Skipped: 330 | |
(Differing total again.) | |
Ladislav 16-Dec-2012 [58] | Hmm, that may need a fix... |
Andreas 16-Dec-2012 [59] | The last result is GCC 4.3.2 + glibc 2.7 at compile time, glibc 2.16 at runtime. |
Ladislav 16-Dec-2012 [60] | How come you have Crashes: 11? |
Andreas 16-Dec-2012 [61x3] | How would I find out? |
run-safe and diff the full log? | |
To see what's missing? | |
Ladislav 16-Dec-2012 [64] | those are the ones marked as #crash |
Andreas 16-Dec-2012 [65] | But I have "crashes: 11" for RT-built A111 on this machine as well. |
Ladislav 16-Dec-2012 [66x2] | #r3crash |
yes, that is in the test source. I guess that you do not use the latest tests | |
Andreas 16-Dec-2012 [68] | I use the tests as cloned a few hours ago. |
Ladislav 16-Dec-2012 [69] | aha, let me check |
Andreas 16-Dec-2012 [70] | I think the additional guess is another real regression on the machine I'm using. But let me find out which test is newly crashing. |
Ladislav 16-Dec-2012 [71] | No, that is not how it works |
Andreas 16-Dec-2012 [72] | It just counts the #r3crash? |
Ladislav 16-Dec-2012 [73x3] | It just counts the #r3crash - 7 times and #test3crash - 3 times |
(in my file) | |
strange | |
Andreas 16-Dec-2012 [76] | Well, then it is definitely my set of tests. |
Ladislav 16-Dec-2012 [77] | #r3crash is supposed to crash the interpreter, #test3crash is suppossed to crash the test framework |
Andreas 16-Dec-2012 [78x2] | Ah, correct. I accidentally had an additional test copied over. |
Built with GCC 4.3.2: 17-Dec-2012/0:03:50+1:00 2.101.0.4.2 Total: 4333 Succeeded: 3950 Test failures: 53 Crashes: 10 Dialect failures: 0 Skipped: 330 Built with GCC 4.7.2: 17-Dec-2012/0:03:45+1:00 2.101.0.4.4 Total: 4333 Succeeded: 3948 Test failures: 55 Crashes: 10 Dialect failures: 0 Skipped: 33 The round testcases. | |
Ladislav 16-Dec-2012 [80x6] | 17-Dec-2012/0:03:50+1:00 2.101.0.4.2 Total: 4333 Succeeded: 3950 Test failures: 53 Crashes: 10 Dialect failures: 0 Skipped: 330 - hmm, that total is not correct |
Should be 4343 | |
(the total is simply the sum of the numbers) | |
Total: succeeded + test-failures + crashes + dialect-failures + skipped | |
(that line is from %test-framework.r) | |
Carl merged my update almost immediately | |
Andreas 16-Dec-2012 [86] | Good timing :) |
Ladislav 16-Dec-2012 [87x2] | What about the total, Andreas? That is suspicious... |
(never experienced that here) | |
AdrianS 16-Dec-2012 [89x2] | Is carl going to spring an R3 web chat on us? The last message in chat: #8073: post from Carl 26-Nov: Yes, the web interface is also working. Top level is a bit slow, but other links seem to respond ok. |
I noticed he didn't answer in the blog when I asked about chat being open sourced. Could he be planning to take it commercial? | |
older newer | first last |