World: r4wp
[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group
older newer | first last |
DocKimbel 13-May-2013 [1848x2] | Kaj, very nice work! Hope this would inspire others to write R3 extensions in Red using your binding. |
Pekr: the `hello` symbol exported to R3 is mapped to index 0 in RX_Call, so from there you can map it to `do-hello` or whatever Red function you want, no bug there. | |
Pekr 13-May-2013 [1850] | Kaj - is your binding different to Doc's one, or the same stuff? |
Kaj 14-May-2013 [1851x2] | I started my binding first, to try to help Doc make progress towards supporting Android. He used some code from it, but he doesn't need a complete JNI binding in Red itself |
My binding implements the complete JNI interface now, at the lowest Red/System level. Doc's bridge binds only a handful of JNI functions, but he is building higher levels on them now towards a bridge with Red | |
Pekr 14-May-2013 [1853] | thanks, Kaj. Then keep your work, more complete binding might become handy to those who maight need it ... |
james_nak 15-May-2013 [1854] | Kaj, thanks for your work. I haven't looked but are there any examples that I can try on my devices? |
Kaj 15-May-2013 [1855] | For the R3 bridge, there's a Red example and a Red/System example in source form. No binaries at the moment |
james_nak 15-May-2013 [1856] | Those are the Hello examples? |
Kaj 15-May-2013 [1857x2] | Compilation depends on a Red development branch, so I can't integrate it with my build runs for binary downloads yet |
hello-REBOL-3-extension.*, yes | |
james_nak 15-May-2013 [1859] | I see. Thanks, Kaj. You and Doc are something else. |
Kaj 15-May-2013 [1860x2] | Thanks |
The example for JNI is hello-JNI.*, but you have to compile two parts. The Red/System part needs to be compiled like the R3 bridge, as a library. The Java part needs to be compiled by Java, similar to Doc's instructions for his Java bridge | |
Arnold 15-May-2013 [1862] | Kaj, you seem unstoppable! |
Bo 15-May-2013 [1863] | Kaj, great work on OpenGL! Question: Am I understanding correctly that the OpenGL backends currently available don't use the hardware rendering in the GPU? If this is a correct understanding, do you have a roadmap for including hardware rendering capability? Just curious. |
Kaj 15-May-2013 [1864] | Yes, there's some way to go to implement other backends, but I've taken up work on that again |
GrahamC 19-May-2013 [1865] | @Kaj, so you static binding could be wrttten as a r3 extension as well? |
Pekr 20-May-2013 [1866] | GrahamC - interesting question :-) |
Kaj 20-May-2013 [1867x2] | Yes, you should be able to mix library and executable functionality in all sorts of ways now |
Not sure if Red can #import libraries from other libraries, but it should | |
DocKimbel 21-May-2013 [1869x3] | Haven't tested that yet, I guess it should work on Unix, not sure for Windows. |
Kja, nice progress on OpenGL support! | |
(Sorry for the typo, low caffeine level ;-)) | |
Kaj 21-May-2013 [1872] | Low sleep level here; home improvement day with Freddy |
GrahamC 21-May-2013 [1873x2] | so, can you make a GUI out of all this? |
OS-mesa | |
Kaj 21-May-2013 [1875x3] | You have to build it yourself out of 3D particles such as triangles, polygons and textures. Or use an existing one and write an extra binding for that |
Of course, we already have GTK+ | |
There's also the other way around: most GUI toolkits such as GTK have an OpenGL widget, so with my multi-backend design I can make OpenGL backends for the widgets of those toolkits. You'd have your regular widgets and then the option to use part of the window for 3D | |
GrahamC 21-May-2013 [1878] | I'm struggling with a fully built r3gui so I might just wait a bit! |
Kaj 21-May-2013 [1879] | I'm eying some libraries that could be used for medical applications :-) |
GrahamC 21-May-2013 [1880] | most of the stuff I've needed I've had to build myself :( |
Kaj 21-May-2013 [1881] | In REBOL or in medical? |
GrahamC 21-May-2013 [1882] | medical stuff for Rebol |
Kaj 21-May-2013 [1883] | Yeah, not much support there |
GrahamC 21-May-2013 [1884] | well, there's a billion$ out there for medical apps |
Kaj 21-May-2013 [1885] | Paying customers? |
GrahamC 21-May-2013 [1886x4] | for myself .. and those who use my app |
http://www.familypracticenews.com/specialty-focus/practice-trends/single-article-page/cms-offers-1-billion-for-health-innovators/5af5ff109c79a6102ee15c199edf28cd.html?email=[HELENWYANG-:-HOTMAIL-:-COM]&ocid=814208 | |
ooops | |
someone's email is attached to that link | |
Kaj 21-May-2013 [1890] | For eternity, then |
GrahamC 21-May-2013 [1891] | just came in my mailing list |
Kaj 21-May-2013 [1892] | Another looping blank page |
GrahamC 21-May-2013 [1893] | works for me .. but CMS wants better health models, and they can pay :) |
Kaj 21-May-2013 [1894] | Those are US grants, aren't they? |
GrahamC 21-May-2013 [1895] | yes |
Kaj 21-May-2013 [1896x2] | A horrible site that is completely broken without cookies |
Can you apply for that? | |
older newer | first last |