World: r4wp
[Ann-Reply] Reply to Announce group
older newer | first last |
Pekr 8-Jan-2013 [1121x2] | http://www.red-lang.org/p/donations.html |
ah :-) | |
Bo 8-Jan-2013 [1123x4] | Thanks for adding those links to the checklist. Now to dig out my checkbook... ;-) |
It's been a difficult year financially, but I wanted to donate something, so just donated $20 to Saphirion for the Android port. | |
Hopefully more to come as business improves... | |
I want to also donate some to Red. Soon... | |
Cyphre 9-Jan-2013 [1127] | Thanks a lot Bo! To make things easier, all donations for the R3/Droid port I'm wokring on are going thru Saphirion's webpage. |
Robert 9-Jan-2013 [1128] | Bo, thanks a lot! That's really great. |
MagnussonC 11-Jan-2013 [1129] | Good job with the prebuild site |
Andreas 11-Jan-2013 [1130] | Thanks! |
PeterWood 11-Jan-2013 [1131] | A very kind gift to the REBOL community. |
DocKimbel 11-Jan-2013 [1132] | Nice work Andreas! |
Ladislav 11-Jan-2013 [1133] | Andreas: you should let Carl know by mentioning it on the GitHub, I think |
Andreas 11-Jan-2013 [1134] | I wrote Carl a mail to tell him about it. |
DideC 11-Jan-2013 [1135] | Yes, Andreas, very nice looking site. And thanks too to Saphirion for the build farm. |
Andreas 11-Jan-2013 [1136x2] | Build farm is 2/3 mine, 1/3 Saphirion :) |
Saphirion contributes the OSX machine, for which I'm very grateful. | |
Endo 11-Jan-2013 [1138] | Very nice work Andreas! |
Maxim 11-Jan-2013 [1139] | Andreas, good idea. I'd only add that you should append the rebol version to the executables/archives (if ever), so that when we download them, they don't overwrite each other. adding the version will also classify each version based on its platform. |
Andreas 11-Jan-2013 [1140x2] | Maxim, thanks. |
The version is already appended to the executable names, that's the -g.... suffix. For these automated builds, the Rebol version is currently rather meaningless, it will always be 2.101.0. I'll think about appending a platform key to the binary names themselves. | |
Maxim 11-Jan-2013 [1142x2] | thanks for considering it. :-) |
at some point, the version will be incremented no? | |
AdrianS 11-Jan-2013 [1144] | Are you going to keep older versions? |
Maxim 11-Jan-2013 [1145] | when some dramatic changes will occur, it might be necessary... for example, some tools might require older binaries until they are updated. |
AdrianS 11-Jan-2013 [1146] | it would be good for doing triage on bugs |
Maxim 11-Jan-2013 [1147] | maybe, simply adding a folder with the date of any automated builds. this way we can easily backtrack any issues in time. |
AdrianS 11-Jan-2013 [1148] | sorry, meant doing something like bisect of version control, not triage |
Andreas 11-Jan-2013 [1149] | binaries are not deleted, so you can still download them, if you have the url. i'll probably add an archive page later on. |
AdrianS 11-Jan-2013 [1150] | What about the points I asked about in the community group? Not worth it, you think? |
Andreas 11-Jan-2013 [1151x3] | ah, sorry, forgot about those questions :) |
compiler switches: i'm currently building from the mainline sources without any custom modifications. | |
so typically a build is just three steps: - fetching an r3-make - make make - make clean prep | |
AdrianS 11-Jan-2013 [1154] | well, some build details might be nice - for example under Windows which toolchain was used - these details might be important if/when people start comparing performance among builds gotten here and elsewhere |
Andreas 11-Jan-2013 [1155x2] | toolchain is mentioned on the downloads page. |
win7, gcc 4.6.2, r3 2.100.111.3.1 for bootstrapping | |
AdrianS 11-Jan-2013 [1157] | I'm blind |
Andreas 11-Jan-2013 [1158x3] | if you need/want more detail, just ask away |
debug builds: maybe. i'd like to get this added to the mainline sources first. once that's done, i'm still not so sure if they really are that useful at the moment, as I think they won't help much without a build environment set up. | |
but then, why not :) | |
AdrianS 11-Jan-2013 [1161x3] | if you provided symbols, you could have useful output even with something like process explorer |
and maybe a link to how to use the symbols with process explorer - this would allow relatively non-technical people report readable stack traces on a hang, for example | |
maybe point to this, if you add symbols: http://superuser.com/questions/462969/how-can-i-view-the-active-threads-of-a-running-program | |
Andreas 11-Jan-2013 [1164] | well, with the basic build farm in place and the website launched, i'll maybe get to some more build process revisions (including debug builds) soon. |
GrahamC 11-Jan-2013 [1165x2] | Nice .. are you adopting fork's logo for the open source rebol now :) ? |
Some sites like to add md5 checksums to their downloads pages | |
Gregg 11-Jan-2013 [1167] | Thanks, to Andreas and the Saphirion team! |
Bo 11-Jan-2013 [1168] | I'm good with Fork's logo. If the community agrees on a different one in the future, it could be changed. Some projects, like Cobian Backup, have a different logo for each major release. :-O |
sqlab 12-Jan-2013 [1169] | speed?/no-io [956 560 23 0] on Samsung Note II |
Andreas 12-Jan-2013 [1170] | Graham, did you ever check the md5sums? |
older newer | first last |