World: r3wp
[!REBOL3 Source Control] How to manage build process
older newer | first last |
Carl 29-Oct-2010 [393x2] | So, there's a git patch command to emit patch file? |
Or does user do that manually? | |
Andreas 29-Oct-2010 [395x2] | git diff emits patches |
git format-patch emits patches that are ready to be emailed | |
Carl 29-Oct-2010 [397] | is the "fork" you mention for 4b1 the same as a clone? |
Andreas 29-Oct-2010 [398] | The specific "forking" I was referring to is a Github feature. |
Carl 29-Oct-2010 [399] | ok |
Andreas 29-Oct-2010 [400x4] | We can quickly try it out, it is really simple. |
But if you have a look at http://github.com/earl/r3-hostkit | |
You will see that at the top there is a link "forked from rebolsource/r3-hostkit". | |
When you look at http://github.com/rebolsource/r3-hostkit/network/members | |
Carl 29-Oct-2010 [404] | Whoops, I'm being called to dinner. Will be back in a while, and will check that out. |
Andreas 29-Oct-2010 [405x2] | You'll see that Github lists all "forks" there. |
Enjoy! | |
Carl 29-Oct-2010 [407] | bye for now |
Andreas 29-Oct-2010 [408] | Brian, the only trouble with letting git do the line ending normalisation is that it is a bit troublesome. It's generally easier to just have git not touch the line endings at all and use a properly set-up editor instead. |
BrianH 29-Oct-2010 [409] | Oh, I was used to Hg just doing that without the problems. Can we reject submissions that don't have the right line endings? |
Andreas 29-Oct-2010 [410] | Yes. |
BrianH 29-Oct-2010 [411] | And I assume every major C/C++ compiler on Windows can handle LF-endings with no complaint. |
Andreas 29-Oct-2010 [412] | We only have to support one that does. |
BrianH 29-Oct-2010 [413] | Is there a pending proposal to fix git's line ending munging so it works properly, like Hg's? |
Andreas 29-Oct-2010 [414] | (-> "Source control") |
Carl 29-Oct-2010 [415] | Useful git guide: www.sourcemage.org/Git_Guide Shows examples of many commands. In FAQ format. |
Andreas 29-Oct-2010 [416x3] | A few examples there are a bit out of date, though. |
For example, git-update-index is no longer needed to resolve merge conflics. You'd use git-add instead. | |
And in the "advanced usage" examples, a few commands have been simplified. | |
Carl 29-Oct-2010 [419x3] | A question: for new releases, should I push to my carls repo, the rebol sandbox, or r3-hostkit ? |
Asked another way: how does r3-hostkit get updated? | |
Do we always pull into it? | |
Andreas 29-Oct-2010 [422x5] | I would push into rebol/r3-hostkit for now. |
(Which does not yet exist.) | |
The rebol/sandbox is just if you want to play around a bit with Github. | |
We'll probably just delete that afterwards. | |
Of course you can also create a repo under your carls user for playing around. | |
Carl 29-Oct-2010 [427] | Another question: do you normally access github from git? Do you ever use the web interface? |
Andreas 29-Oct-2010 [428] | You hardly need to use the web interface. |
Carl 29-Oct-2010 [429x2] | Good to know. |
Is there a command for renaming files? | |
Andreas 29-Oct-2010 [431] | git-mv |
Carl 29-Oct-2010 [432] | If I remove a file from my repo, then I push . does it remove it from the target repo? |
Andreas 29-Oct-2010 [433x2] | If you remove with git-rm, then create a commit with git-commit, then git-push: yes. |
If you remove with something else, you'll still need to create a commit for that remove. | |
Carl 29-Oct-2010 [435x2] | What is the reason to use git-push vs git push ? |
(and other cmds) | |
Andreas 29-Oct-2010 [437x3] | That's just a convetion I use to refer to commands. |
When I say git-push, you actually writ e `git push`. | |
But if you want to know more: man git-push | |
Carl 29-Oct-2010 [440] | Well, I must say... I am impressed so far. There are a lot of "nice touches" |
Andreas 29-Oct-2010 [441x2] | I'm sure you'll be even more impressed when you dig deeper. |
It is so _extremely_ simple at it's core :) | |
older newer | first last |