World: r3wp
[ReBorCon 2011] REBOL & Boron Conference
older newer | first last |
Pekr 27-Feb-2011 [329] | Oldes - I fear that Carl closes the shop, instead of open-sourcing. Or - he might continue in R3 development, doing 2 releases per year, being still in alpha after another 5 years, and gaining some momentum on some vapor lists, where e.g. Amiga is being recently listed :-) |
BrianH 27-Feb-2011 [330] | Red's MIT/BSD licensed (which? both?) so there 's no reason we can't work on both R3 and Red. |
Dockimbel 27-Feb-2011 [331] | I don't think my announcement will change anything for R3 development. In fact, it might even attract more people to R3, while waiting for a working Red version. ;-) |
GrahamC 27-Feb-2011 [332] | The last time i looked at Paul Graham's arc, that seemed to be stalled as well. the point is that this is a huge undertaking for any single person |
Dockimbel 27-Feb-2011 [333] | Brian: I haven't choosed yet. |
Gregg 27-Feb-2011 [334] | Thanks for the PDF doc. I had trouble with RocketSlide as well. |
BrianH 27-Feb-2011 [335] | They can be complementary. Red is really limited (according to the slides), so mixed language projects could be appropriate as long as Red's syntax is a strict subset. |
GrahamC 27-Feb-2011 [336] | So, developers will have to choose where they want to go ... and there's a limited pool of rebol developers |
BrianH 27-Feb-2011 [337] | It would even be possible to extend R3 with a Red dialect. |
Pekr 27-Feb-2011 [338] | Graham - developers can't affect R3 Core development, not in public enough manner. So Red might be a testbed for R3 too ... and who knows, maybe Carl will be motivated to restart R3 development :-) |
GrahamC 27-Feb-2011 [339] | I hope so ... |
nve 27-Feb-2011 [340] | For me, R2 is the only REBOLed product. R3 is still alpha version since years. For the transition to Red, R2 is good. |
GrahamC 27-Feb-2011 [341] | the last time there was a language fork .. RT made some announcements to try and make rebol more attractive |
Dockimbel 27-Feb-2011 [342] | BrianH: sure, why not. |
Pekr 27-Feb-2011 [343x2] | yes, it was when Doc was working on R# - Carl then announced plug-ins, which never materialised for R2 though :-) |
Doc - have you looked into Orca/Boron, if there is something usefull for Red? Or are those interepreter based too? | |
BrianH 27-Feb-2011 [345x3] | I almost never use R2, except for R2/Forward. Most of my work is in R3, and depends on it. For me, R3 works already, and "alpha" is irrelevant. |
Orca/Boron aren't license compatible with Red, same as with R3. | |
The main block on sharing work with Orca/Boron and REBOL is their license. | |
nve 27-Feb-2011 [348] | Except that Rebol is sold. I can't imagine that Carl is not going to sell R3 !? |
Pekr 27-Feb-2011 [349] | BrianH - from end user's perspective, you might not be right - missing pop, smtp, ftp, sqlite, mysql, postgress in official distro, just to name the few, GUI's not useable yet too, hence ppl keep tied to R2 .... |
Gregg 27-Feb-2011 [350] | That's why I'm tied to R2 Petr, and CALL is important to me as well. |
Dockimbel 27-Feb-2011 [351] | Pekr: Interpreted as well and written in C, so no possible code re-use for Red. But I must admit that if I hadn't choosed the compilation path, I would have jumped into Boron to contribute. There's some good potential there for a serious R2 open source clone. |
Pekr 27-Feb-2011 [352] | someone should get the info to Carl, maybe he will stop breeding chicken and start coding R3 again :-) (just a joke - I have nothing about breeding animals :-) |
BrianH 27-Feb-2011 [353] | Agreed, Pekr, but my situation is different. I don't use most of that stuff, and when I do I have R2, or many other languages. Most of my apps have no UI. |
Pekr 27-Feb-2011 [354] | Gregg - right, I forgot that one - 'call, and very bad console, which did not serve initial purpose - being usable via ssh etc connection anyway ... |
Gregg 27-Feb-2011 [355] | Red's forward-thinking view on parallelism is very welcome too. |
GrahamC 27-Feb-2011 [356] | R3 also does not have a 64 bit path mapped for it |
Pekr 27-Feb-2011 [357] | Gregg - well, we have odbc for R3, as well as libCurl for networking (or Graham's networking protocols), call is here, it just does not wait nor does it read the output .... |
Gregg 27-Feb-2011 [358] | Yes, Graham, also important. |
nve 27-Feb-2011 [359] | Today, the best way is to open sourced R2 and merge with Boron effort. As R3 is different from R2. |
Gregg 27-Feb-2011 [360] | We're a bit OT here, don't want to hijack the group. |
GrahamC 27-Feb-2011 [361] | well, the group purpose is completed! |
BrianH 27-Feb-2011 [362] | Can't merge with Boron while it has a *GPL license. |
GrahamC 27-Feb-2011 [363] | the reborcon is over .. |
nve 27-Feb-2011 [364] | Winter edition, but Kaj talks about fall edition ! |
GrahamC 27-Feb-2011 [365] | ( wish people would stop using seasons ... ! it's summer here! ) |
Andreas 27-Feb-2011 [366] | Pekr, CALL in R3 is waiting (on Win32, at least). |
Gregg 27-Feb-2011 [367] | That's why you're always early for the confrerences Graham. |
GrahamC 27-Feb-2011 [368] | or late ! |
nve 27-Feb-2011 [369] | ( Summer ! Cool ! ) |
Kaj 27-Feb-2011 [370x4] | Yes, there will be an autumn conference, to finish this one |
The name is already outdated, though :-) | |
Doc will try to be there to report on Red progress | |
Graham, if you were here, you would have felt it was the winter edition ;-) | |
GrahamC 27-Feb-2011 [374] | Looks like Rebol is undergoing a renaissance via open source forks |
Kaj 27-Feb-2011 [375x4] | I hope so |
Added the Red link to the site | |
Karl has published the 3D Boron demo, including OpenGL Boron builds for Linux and OS X: | |
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/urlan/wiki/BoronFiles | |
older newer | first last |