r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[ReBorCon 2011] REBOL & Boron Conference

GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[328]
Carl has written a number of languages now .. .commercial ones, doc 
.. I don't know
Pekr
27-Feb-2011
[329]
Oldes - I fear that Carl closes the shop, instead of open-sourcing. 
Or - he might continue in R3 development, doing 2 releases per year, 
being still in alpha after another 5 years, and gaining some momentum 
on some vapor lists, where e.g. Amiga is being recently listed :-)
BrianH
27-Feb-2011
[330]
Red's MIT/BSD licensed (which? both?) so there 's no reason we can't 
work on both R3 and Red.
Dockimbel
27-Feb-2011
[331]
I don't think my announcement will change anything for R3 development. 
In fact, it might even attract more people to R3, while waiting for 
a working Red version. ;-)
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[332]
The last time i looked at Paul Graham's arc, that seemed to be stalled 
as well.  the point is that this is a huge undertaking for any single 
person
Dockimbel
27-Feb-2011
[333]
Brian: I haven't choosed yet.
Gregg
27-Feb-2011
[334]
Thanks for the PDF doc. I had trouble with RocketSlide as well.
BrianH
27-Feb-2011
[335]
They can be complementary. Red is really limited (according to the 
slides), so mixed language projects could be appropriate as long 
as Red's syntax is a strict subset.
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[336]
So, developers will have to choose where they want to go ... and 
there's a limited pool of rebol developers
BrianH
27-Feb-2011
[337]
It would even be possible to extend R3 with a Red dialect.
Pekr
27-Feb-2011
[338]
Graham - developers can't affect R3 Core development, not in public 
enough manner. So Red might be a testbed for R3 too ... and who knows, 
maybe Carl will be motivated to restart R3 development :-)
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[339]
I hope so ...
nve
27-Feb-2011
[340]
For me, R2 is the only REBOLed product. R3 is still alpha version 
since years.
For the transition to Red, R2 is good.
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[341]
the last time there was a language fork .. RT made some announcements 
to try and make rebol more attractive
Dockimbel
27-Feb-2011
[342]
BrianH: sure, why not.
Pekr
27-Feb-2011
[343x2]
yes, it was when Doc was working on R# - Carl then announced plug-ins, 
which never materialised for R2 though :-)
Doc - have you looked into Orca/Boron, if there is something usefull 
for Red? Or are those interepreter based too?
BrianH
27-Feb-2011
[345x3]
I almost never use R2, except for R2/Forward. Most of my work is 
in R3, and depends on it. For me, R3 works already, and "alpha" is 
irrelevant.
Orca/Boron aren't license compatible with Red, same as with R3.
The main block on sharing work with Orca/Boron and REBOL is their 
license.
nve
27-Feb-2011
[348]
Except that Rebol is sold. I can't imagine that Carl is not going 
to sell R3 !?
Pekr
27-Feb-2011
[349]
BrianH - from end user's perspective, you might not be right - missing 
pop, smtp, ftp, sqlite, mysql, postgress in official distro, just 
to name the few, GUI's not useable yet too, hence ppl keep tied to 
R2 ....
Gregg
27-Feb-2011
[350]
That's why I'm tied to R2 Petr, and CALL is important to me as well.
Dockimbel
27-Feb-2011
[351]
Pekr: Interpreted as well and written in C, so no possible code re-use 
for Red. But I must admit that if I hadn't choosed the compilation 
path, I would have jumped into Boron to contribute. There's some 
good potential there for a serious R2 open source clone.
Pekr
27-Feb-2011
[352]
someone should get the info to Carl, maybe he will stop breeding 
chicken and start coding R3 again :-) (just a joke - I have nothing 
about breeding animals :-)
BrianH
27-Feb-2011
[353]
Agreed, Pekr, but my situation is different. I don't use most of 
that stuff, and when I do I have R2, or many other languages. Most 
of my apps have no UI.
Pekr
27-Feb-2011
[354]
Gregg - right, I forgot that one - 'call, and very bad console, which 
did not serve initial purpose - being usable via ssh etc connection 
anyway ...
Gregg
27-Feb-2011
[355]
Red's forward-thinking view on parallelism is very welcome too.
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[356]
R3 also does not have a 64 bit path mapped for it
Pekr
27-Feb-2011
[357]
Gregg - well, we have odbc for R3, as well as libCurl for networking 
(or Graham's networking protocols), call is here, it just does not 
wait nor does it read the output ....
Gregg
27-Feb-2011
[358]
Yes, Graham, also important.
nve
27-Feb-2011
[359]
Today, the best way is to open sourced R2 and merge with Boron effort.
As R3 is different from R2.
Gregg
27-Feb-2011
[360]
We're a bit OT here, don't want to hijack the group.
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[361]
well, the group purpose is completed!
BrianH
27-Feb-2011
[362]
Can't merge with Boron while it has a *GPL license.
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[363]
the reborcon is over ..
nve
27-Feb-2011
[364]
Winter edition, but Kaj talks about fall edition !
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[365]
( wish people would stop using seasons ... !  it's summer here! )
Andreas
27-Feb-2011
[366]
Pekr, CALL in R3 is waiting (on Win32, at least).
Gregg
27-Feb-2011
[367]
That's why you're always early for the confrerences Graham.
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[368]
or late !
nve
27-Feb-2011
[369]
( Summer ! Cool ! )
Kaj
27-Feb-2011
[370x4]
Yes, there will be an autumn conference, to finish this one
The name is already outdated, though :-)
Doc will try to be there to report on Red progress
Graham, if you were here, you would have felt it was the winter edition 
;-)
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[374]
Looks like Rebol is undergoing a renaissance via open source forks
Kaj
27-Feb-2011
[375x3]
I hope so
Added the Red link to the site
Karl has published the 3D Boron demo, including OpenGL Boron builds 
for Linux and OS X: