r3wp [groups: 83 posts: 189283]
  • Home
  • Script library
  • AltME Archive
  • Mailing list
  • Articles Index
  • Site search
 

World: r3wp

[ReBorCon 2011] REBOL & Boron Conference

GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[299x3]
star burst
anyway it seems to be working again.
got to slide 14 .. do the X mean you've completed those tasks?
Dockimbel
27-Feb-2011
[302x2]
Yes, but it's 90% only for the second item.
The main missing feature is string! type read/write support.
jocko
27-Feb-2011
[304]
Doc, could you add the pdf ? I can't get the presentation.
Dockimbel
27-Feb-2011
[305]
Sure, I'm currently uploading it.
jocko
27-Feb-2011
[306]
thanks !
Dockimbel
27-Feb-2011
[307]
Ok done, just reload the page, you should see a PDF link below the 
slides.
jocko
27-Feb-2011
[308]
ok, I got it
Dockimbel
27-Feb-2011
[309]
I've fixed all the typos in the new version. Thank you, Graham.
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[310x3]
you're welcome
What developer channel will you use?
A web based BBS?
Dockimbel
27-Feb-2011
[313]
I'm thinking about using Google Groups...I'll do a review of possible 
options in the next days to decide.
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[314x3]
I remember you used altme before and of course all that discussion 
is now gone ...
spam can be a problem on google groups .. not sure if that is still 
the case
I'm surprised you don't mention Cheyenne in your credits :)
Oldes
27-Feb-2011
[317]
There is mentioned built-in webserver.
Dockimbel
27-Feb-2011
[318x2]
Good catch! I did the introductory slide for the Cheyenne presentation 
first, so it wasn't necessary. Then I forgot to add it when I copy/past-ed 
the slide in Red presentation. :-)
The built-in webserver will be simplified, lightweight version of 
Cheyenne written in Red.
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[320]
red_lang now has 6 followers and no tweets!
Pekr
27-Feb-2011
[321]
what will happen to poor r3 now? :-)
Dockimbel
27-Feb-2011
[322]
Twitter: I'll send a welcome message :-)
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[323x2]
Pekr, R3 has been in development for .. is it 5 years now?
Evolution will decide the place for each language
Oldes
27-Feb-2011
[325]
I wonder as well if this means that Carl will stop completely or 
want to finish R3 asap.
Pekr
27-Feb-2011
[326]
Graham - it was sad irony on my part :-) I remember how I translated 
Carl's interview somewhere in 1996, when he left Viscorp, and was 
asked by Gateway, to join in and to lead Amiga. He has choosed REBOL 
instead, stating, that he wants to avoid Amiga mistakes of the past. 
Now he is effectively killing REBOL by no-action just the same way 
....
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[327x2]
competition is good ... leads to better products
Carl has written a number of languages now .. .commercial ones, doc 
.. I don't know
Pekr
27-Feb-2011
[329]
Oldes - I fear that Carl closes the shop, instead of open-sourcing. 
Or - he might continue in R3 development, doing 2 releases per year, 
being still in alpha after another 5 years, and gaining some momentum 
on some vapor lists, where e.g. Amiga is being recently listed :-)
BrianH
27-Feb-2011
[330]
Red's MIT/BSD licensed (which? both?) so there 's no reason we can't 
work on both R3 and Red.
Dockimbel
27-Feb-2011
[331]
I don't think my announcement will change anything for R3 development. 
In fact, it might even attract more people to R3, while waiting for 
a working Red version. ;-)
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[332]
The last time i looked at Paul Graham's arc, that seemed to be stalled 
as well.  the point is that this is a huge undertaking for any single 
person
Dockimbel
27-Feb-2011
[333]
Brian: I haven't choosed yet.
Gregg
27-Feb-2011
[334]
Thanks for the PDF doc. I had trouble with RocketSlide as well.
BrianH
27-Feb-2011
[335]
They can be complementary. Red is really limited (according to the 
slides), so mixed language projects could be appropriate as long 
as Red's syntax is a strict subset.
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[336]
So, developers will have to choose where they want to go ... and 
there's a limited pool of rebol developers
BrianH
27-Feb-2011
[337]
It would even be possible to extend R3 with a Red dialect.
Pekr
27-Feb-2011
[338]
Graham - developers can't affect R3 Core development, not in public 
enough manner. So Red might be a testbed for R3 too ... and who knows, 
maybe Carl will be motivated to restart R3 development :-)
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[339]
I hope so ...
nve
27-Feb-2011
[340]
For me, R2 is the only REBOLed product. R3 is still alpha version 
since years.
For the transition to Red, R2 is good.
GrahamC
27-Feb-2011
[341]
the last time there was a language fork .. RT made some announcements 
to try and make rebol more attractive
Dockimbel
27-Feb-2011
[342]
BrianH: sure, why not.
Pekr
27-Feb-2011
[343x2]
yes, it was when Doc was working on R# - Carl then announced plug-ins, 
which never materialised for R2 though :-)
Doc - have you looked into Orca/Boron, if there is something usefull 
for Red? Or are those interepreter based too?
BrianH
27-Feb-2011
[345x3]
I almost never use R2, except for R2/Forward. Most of my work is 
in R3, and depends on it. For me, R3 works already, and "alpha" is 
irrelevant.
Orca/Boron aren't license compatible with Red, same as with R3.
The main block on sharing work with Orca/Boron and REBOL is their 
license.
nve
27-Feb-2011
[348]
Except that Rebol is sold. I can't imagine that Carl is not going 
to sell R3 !?